Edexcel A Level Global Politics Paper 3 (9PL0 3B)

Feel like regionalism is going to come up but also maybe ICJ due to the Israel situation currently

Feel like regionalism is going to come up but also maybe ICJ due to the Israel situation currently

talked to my politics teacher yesterday and he said regionalisms not likely to come up, he said a question like managing conflict and security is more of a concern than economic and global environment

can you elaborate on what you mean

i’ll put it in a question form. to what extent are non state actors (such as nato and the UN) more concerned with tackling conflict and security issues (wars and conflicts) rather than addressing economic issues (such as poverty) and environmental issues (such as climate change) hope that helps

ah i see. i never know how to structure these questions? what would you do your three sections on if the question was: Evaluate the view that global governance has succeeded in preventing conflict between states but failed to prevent human rights abuses

So my advice this is what my teacher said, the split the essay in half. first address conflict so i would talk about
1. humanitarian intervention to resolve armed conflict
2. peace keeping missions than UN and Nato involved inn
3. Courts and tribunals prosecuting war criminals in tribunals
then address Human Rights
1. States remaining sovereign and do not have to cooperate with laws and legislation which protect human rights e.g many arab nations still use execution as punishment for homosexuality which is a protected characteristic
2. humanitarian intervention is selective and fails to address human rights abuses such as rwandan genocide 1994 and UNSC security council contains powerful nations like the USA who use veto to stop humanitarian aid from entering Gaza
3. limited jurisdiction of court such as ICC ICJ
e.g russia doesn’t follow pretty much any court rulings

so if your LOA is that yes they are better at conflict.
then your for paragraph would be your first point but then how do you counter that and say human rights abuses are prevented….
I don’t get how you do a for and against structure for these types of questions when they’re linking two contemporary problems together.