The Student Room Group

WJEC A-Level Biology Unit 4 (1400U40-1) - 14 June 2024 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60

Ohh I didn't know the gene replaces the ampicillin. I said that because they appeared in the tetracycline plate they are the non-recombinant plasmids.

Reply 61

Original post
by el456
Ohh I didn't know the gene replaces the ampicillin. I said that because they appeared in the tetracycline plate they are the non-recombinant plasmids.
Yh it wasn't really told in the question and it was quite unclear in the diagram. Basically in the diagram it showed a circle with the plasmid and then the tetracycline and ampicillin resistant gene. It then had a label saying site of insertion of HCG gene on the site where the ampicillin resistant gene was located. They appeared on the tetracycline plate because they want to show all the bacteria were resistant to tetracycline so that the missing colonies on the ampicillin could be identified. That question literally sums up the whole paper. It was literally just application of knowledge

Reply 62

Original post
by Jroy
If this was the 3 marker I said that these bacteria were the recombinant ones that had the plasmid containing the HCG gene ( which replaced the ampicillin resistance gene) so these colonies were missing.


Ok I said this too and I wasn’t a fan of that question so that’s good

Reply 63

Original post
by Jroy
Yh it wasn't really told in the question and it was quite unclear in the diagram. Basically in the diagram it showed a circle with the plasmid and then the tetracycline and ampicillin resistant gene. It then had a label saying site of insertion of HCG gene on the site where the ampicillin resistant gene was located. They appeared on the tetracycline plate because they want to show all the bacteria were resistant to tetracycline so that the missing colonies on the ampicillin could be identified. That question literally sums up the whole paper. It was literally just application of knowledge

Oh so they basically switched it to catch people out? because what I revised was the gene is inserted between the tetracycline which disrupts it, so the colonies would only be resistant to tetracycline if they had taken up non recombinant plasmids

Reply 64

Original post
by el456
Oh so they basically switched it to catch people out? because what I revised was the gene is inserted between the tetracycline which disrupts it, so the colonies would only be resistant to tetracycline if they had taken up non recombinant plasmids

Well not really , this topic was explained in the Wjec as bio knowledge organisers. It's called genetic engineering and what they do is use enzymes to cut the plasmid open and replace one portion of the plasmid with the required gene . Also it was actually the recombinant bacteria(which took up the HCG gene) that were only resistant to tetracycline.

Reply 65

Original post
by Bobabbg
Do you think for the next part of the question they would’ve accepted selection pressures and migration as reasons why not in equilibrium?

I wrote about how the one horse had the darker coat, and the other had the more sandy coat, thus one had camouflage and other didn't so that is selection. Cant remember what i put for the point.

Reply 66

Who did immunology?

Reply 67

Original post
by User_F1
Who did immunology?


I did and made many mistakes

Reply 68

Original post
by shd14235
I did and made many mistakes
I found it hard idk why

Reply 69

Original post
by User_F1
I found it hard idk why


The primary and secondary immune was alright, the first part on TB would’ve been alright if I revised more and didn’t really answer the others

Reply 70

Original post
by shd14235
The primary and secondary immune was alright, the first part on TB would’ve been alright if I revised more and didn’t really answer the others
Literally they never really ask about those 5 diseases but they did this time

Reply 71

What do we predict and A will be out of 90 marks for unit 4

Reply 72

Original post
by xx.arclark
What do we predict and A will be out of 90 marks for unit 4


2019 was 47/90 I think according to revise.wales so worst case I would go a couple marks higher but hopefully it is actually lower

Reply 73

Have any of you guys got the 2023 Unit 2 Paper?

Reply 74

Original post
by Bobabbg
2019 was 47/90 I think according to revise.wales so worst case I would go a couple marks higher but hopefully it is actually lower


Yeah I think it will be around 47, I doubt it would be lower

Reply 75

Original post
by User_F1
Who did immunology?

i did, it felt just okay but i feel like i should have revised it more (like i probably won't get 4/4 on the primary immune response part and i forgot the definition of a vaccine🤡)

Reply 76

Have any of you guys got this paper?😭😭 please

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.