PLEASE READ: Theoretical Perspectives on Reflection in Professional Development

Hello everyone,

As part of my CACHE Level 3 Diploma for the Early Years Workforce Course, I was asked to summarise theoretical perspectives on reflection in relation to professional development, joining in an online forum.

I am excited to join this discussion on the importance of reflection in professional development. As professionals, we often face challenging situations that require us to reflect on our actions and decisions. This reflective practice is crucial for our growth and improvement in our respective fields. In this post, I will summarise some key theoretical perspectives on reflection and share insights from my research.

The Importance of Reflection in Professional Development

Reflection is an essential part of professional development because it allows individuals to learn from their experiences, make better decisions, and improve their practice. By reflecting on what went well and what didn't, professionals can develop a deeper understanding of their work and identify areas for improvement.

Kolb’s Learning Cycle

One of the most influential theories on reflection is Kolb’s Learning Cycle. David Kolb proposed a cyclical model of learning that emphasises the importance of experience in the learning process.

According to Kolb, effective learning involves four stages:

1. Concrete Experience: Engaging in an actual experience.

2. Reflective Observation: Reviewing and reflecting on the experience.

3. Abstract Conceptualization: Drawing conclusions and learning from the experience.

4. Active Experimentation: Applying what has been learned to new situations.

This cycle highlights that reflection is not a linear process but a continuous loop where each stage informs the next. By moving through these stages, professionals can gain valuable insights and apply them to enhance their practice.

Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle

Another significant model is Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle, which provides a structured framework for reflection. Graham Gibbs developed this model to help individuals systematically think about the phases of an experience. The cycle consists of six stages:

1. Description: What happened?

2. Feelings: What were you thinking and feeling?

3. Evaluation: What was good and bad about the experience?

4. Analysis: What sense can you make of the situation?

5. Conclusion: What else could you have done?

6. Action Plan: If it arose again, what would you do?

Gibbs’ model is particularly useful because it encourages a thorough examination of an experience, considering both emotions and actions. This comprehensive approach can lead to more profound learning and professional growth.

Reflecting on these theories, reflection is not a passive activity but an active and dynamic process. It requires us to critically examine our experiences, consider different perspectives, and apply new knowledge to improve our practice.

In my own experience, using these models has helped me navigate challenging situations more effectively. For instance, by applying Kolb’s Learning Cycle, I have been able to turn challenging experiences into valuable learning opportunities, enhancing my skills and knowledge over time.

Understanding and applying these theoretical perspectives on reflection can significantly impact our professional development. I encourage everyone to share their experiences and insights on how reflection has influenced their practice. Let’s learn from each other and continue to grow as reflective practitioners.

Looking forward to a productive discussion! What are your thoughts or other theoretical perspectives you found interesting?

Best regards,

Sofia

(edited 10 months ago)

Reply 1

Auksezaja

Hi Sofia,

Welcome to CACHE Level 3 Diploma for the Early Years Workforce Course journey. I was asked too to join online forum.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and findings of theoretical perspectives on reflection in relation to professional development.
There's my research and thoughts.

I have found that Gibbs and Kolb are actually focus same things. However, I observed that it is easer for people to implement Gibbs steps becouse it is more detailed. You can examine the situation objectively and reach the conclusion step by step. Kolbs learning cycle is less detail and before you explore everything detailed it jumps to the conclusion which might create a sense of superficial learning and understanding. Gibbs cycle allows us to learn and plan from. It seems to me that they both focus on the same thing and indeed Kolb's steps are also easily applicable . I think Gibb's steps sometimes require more time in practice and focus feelings which may not always be easy in practice.

Reply 2

farida.d

Original post by Auksezaja

Hi Sofia,
Welcome to CACHE Level 3 Diploma for the Early Years Workforce Course journey. I was asked too to join online forum.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and findings of theoretical perspectives on reflection in relation to professional development.
There's my research and thoughts.
I have found that Gibbs and Kolb are actually focus same things. However, I observed that it is easer for people to implement Gibbs steps becouse it is more detailed. You can examine the situation objectively and reach the conclusion step by step. Kolbs learning cycle is less detail and before you explore everything detailed it jumps to the conclusion which might create a sense of superficial learning and understanding. Gibbs cycle allows us to learn and plan from. It seems to me that they both focus on the same thing and indeed Kolb's steps are also easily applicable . I think Gibb's steps sometimes require more time in practice and focus feelings which may not always be easy in practice.