Hi, i've just started learning the epsilon delta limit, and i've done a question, i know that i got the right answer, but i just want to check if my presentation/solution is correct

I've put the link to the quesion and solution here: https://ibb.co/yPY3mZ5

I've put the link to the quesion and solution here: https://ibb.co/yPY3mZ5

(edited 1 month ago)

Original post by muhammad0112

Hi, i've just started learning the epsilon delta limit, and i've done a question, i know that i got the right answer, but i just want to check if my presentation/solution is correct

I've put the link to the quesion and solution here: https://ibb.co/yPY3mZ5

I've put the link to the quesion and solution here: https://ibb.co/yPY3mZ5

Looks like a few typos, so

•

last line delta = min ...., not epsilon = min.

•

You have an unnecessary/repetition line after |x+3|<6

•

you mix <= and < unnecessarily

Original post by muhammad0112

Hi, i've just started learning the epsilon delta limit, and i've done a question, i know that i got the right answer, but i just want to check if my presentation/solution is correct

I've put the link to the quesion and solution here: https://ibb.co/yPY3mZ5

I've put the link to the quesion and solution here: https://ibb.co/yPY3mZ5

Take these comments in conjunction with mqb2766's.

The overall form of what you've written is fine. This is more important than the small mistakes you've made.

The typo (epsilon for delta) and unnecessary line really don't matter.

But when you go from |x-2|<=1 to 1<x<3, I'd consider that a "true" mistake (even though it's inconsequential here). You do need to be careful about dealing correctly with <= v.s. <; occasionally you'll have arguments where confusing them gives you an incorrect result.

Thank you for your responses, i've fixed the <= sign ( going from |x-2|<=1 to 1<x<3) and i've fixed the typo making sure it's delta = min ... not epsilon = min...

As for the unnecessary/repetition after the |x+3|<6, I'd like to keep it as long as it's mathematically correct, only because it's what my lecturer wrote.

I've fixed my answers, could someone take a look at this and see if it's okay now?

Link to question and solution: https://ibb.co/bBmSMKv

As for the unnecessary/repetition after the |x+3|<6, I'd like to keep it as long as it's mathematically correct, only because it's what my lecturer wrote.

I've fixed my answers, could someone take a look at this and see if it's okay now?

Link to question and solution: https://ibb.co/bBmSMKv

Original post by muhammad0112

Thank you for your responses, i've fixed the <= sign ( going from |x-2|<=1 to 1<x<3) and i've fixed the typo making sure it's delta = min ... not epsilon = min...

As for the unnecessary/repetition after the |x+3|<6, I'd like to keep it as long as it's mathematically correct, only because it's what my lecturer wrote.

I've fixed my answers, could someone take a look at this and see if it's okay now?

Link to question and solution: https://ibb.co/bBmSMKv

As for the unnecessary/repetition after the |x+3|<6, I'd like to keep it as long as it's mathematically correct, only because it's what my lecturer wrote.

I've fixed my answers, could someone take a look at this and see if it's okay now?

Link to question and solution: https://ibb.co/bBmSMKv

Well, if you want a proper critique:

$|x-2| < 1$

$1 < x < 3$

$4<x+3<6$

is not a mathematical argument, it's just a dump of equations. You should connect them together - it doesn't need much - I would just use "so" [1], so something like "|x-2| < 1, so 1 < x < 3, so 4 < x + 3 < 6" is better.

If you want to make the "final result" stand out (e.g. |x+3| < 6), you can just say "so finally". [2]

The line "your lecturer uses": $|x+3| \leq |x| + 3 < 6$ only adds confusion. Again, think about how you'd connect it to the rest of your argument - you can't, which is a good indication it's superfluous. [3]

$|x^2+x-6| < 6 |x-2| < 6\delta$. I would write $|x^2+x-6| = |x+3||x-2| < 6 |x-2| < 6\delta$ here. In principle, you can write it here and avoid where you did the factorization higher up, but even if you don't, I'd prefer the repetition at the point where you actually use it. It's only 5 seconds of writing.

Your final value $\delta = \min(\frac{\varepsilon}{6}, 1)$ allows $\delta = 1$, but you've assumed earlier that $\delta < 1$.

[1] I recommend "so" over a symbol like $\implies$; the latter can get you tangled in knots because you will have sometimes have expressions like $x > \alpha \implies y > \beta$ and then if you want to argue from that that $y^2 < \beta^2$ and you write $x > \alpha \implies y > \beta \implies y^2 < \beta^2$ it's not clear what implies what. (OK, in this case it's still fairly clear, but there will be times when it isn't).

[2] I'm not saying you have to use these exact words - my main point is that using a few actual words is often more helpful than using symbols.

[3] I'm not clear what you're actually doing here, are you adapting an argument your lecturer used for another question? Because this line is basically "wrong" (it's not literally mathematically incorrect, but it isn't helpful. It's like someone is solving x^2 -5x+6 = 0 and in the middle is a line "$\frac{d}{dx} x^2-5x+6 = 2x - 5$" - it's *true*, but it still shouldn't be there).

(edited 1 month ago)

If |x-2| < d then |x+3| < 5 + d (here d = delta) hence

|x^2 + x - 6| = |x-2||x+3| < d (5+d)

So you can avoid this delta<1 business entirely just by setting d(5+d) = epsilon and solving for d>0.

|x^2 + x - 6| = |x-2||x+3| < d (5+d)

So you can avoid this delta<1 business entirely just by setting d(5+d) = epsilon and solving for d>0.

- A Level maths sequences question
- is differentiating x in terms of y the same as implicit differentiation?
- Comparing elastic and inelastic collision unknown mass
- Monster Truck Front Flip
- Hess cycle question
- A Level Biology Question
- Regular Perturbation Problem
- STEP 2006 Solutions Thread
- Chemistry enthalphy change question
- Proving a fraction involving infinity tends to 0
- Enthalpy change question help !!
- enthalpy change
- Chemistry a level transition metals question (please help me)
- STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 Solutions
- STEP Maths I,II,III 1987 Solutions
- Amazon Software Development Engineer Apprenticeship
- Bond Enthalpies Question
- Work Done by a Wheel
- Bond enthalpies question-help pls
- The most unusual way you made friends at uni

Latest

Trending

Last reply 11 hours ago

STEP 2 in 2024: Sharing Your Story! [PLUS WITH SOME SOLUTIONS AND PREDICTION]Maths

20

81

Last reply 1 week ago

AS further maths - is it possible to do if your school doesn't offer it?Maths

4

12