The Student Room Group

Should there be world prime minister who will run world government???

Scroll to see replies

Original post by mqb2766
I missed the bit where you flipped from trump running the world to addressing climate change in the uk. You seem obsessed with promoting trump but not his attitude to the #1 global emergency according to the un. Sunak rolled back the uks commitments, starmer is hoping to be more ambitious. The objective evidence is that the latter is necessary.

Please read my posts #9 and #11. I have said on multiple threads with you, my priority remains the UK. I can engage in discourse about other nations but i intrinsically do not care about them or what they choose to do with their lives.

I told a member many years ago that I actually do not like the UK acting like the 51st State of the US. We need to focus on our own interests and priorities.

Yes, my point was about Sunak’s rolling back of the climate commitments and pushing the deadline forward.
Original post by nonchalant-
It's social media, it's getting bizzare. I heard a British person use the word " finna". Everyone think America culture is their culture. I think the world would love that American government was theirs. It won't work.

It is silly, i agree
Reply 22
Original post by Wired_1800
Please read my posts #9 and #11. I have said on multiple threads with you, my priority remains the UK. I can engage in discourse about other nations but i intrinsically do not care about them or what they choose to do with their lives.
I told a member many years ago that I actually do not like the UK acting like the 51st State of the US. We need to focus on our own interests and priorities.
Yes, my point was about Sunak’s rolling back of the climate commitments and pushing the deadline forward.

You probably need to read your own posts #9,#11 as you dont mention that youve flipped from trump running the world/his climate change (lack of) attitudes to talking about the uk/sunak. But as sunak was kicked out after he reduced the uks commitments, hopefully a more enlightened approach should be in keeping with this global emergency both in the uk and hopefully in other countries.

But as youre changing the story as you go along, not posting evidence, its kinda pointless debating with you, and I use the term very loosely.
(edited 2 months ago)
Original post by mqb2766
You probably need to read your own posts #9,#11 as you dont mention that youve flipped from trump running the world/his climate change (lack of) attitudes to talking about the uk/sunak. But as sunak was kicked out after he reduced the uks commitments, hopefully a more enlightened approach should be in keeping with this global emergency both in the uk and hopefully in other countries.
But as youre changing the story as you go along, not posting evidence, its kinda pointless debating with you, and I use the term very loosely.

Ok. No problem. I’ve had a long day to continue this nonsense. Please read the entire thread again before engaging. Thank you,
Reply 24
Original post by Wired_1800
Ok. No problem. I’ve had a long day to continue this nonsense. Please read the entire thread again before engaging. Thank you,

You really should stop making remarks about others contributions and back up your views with information. In the wiki epstein there are many references to trumps relationship with epstein over more than 10 years, his "wingman". There is nothing about deception. The guy in charge of making a plea deal with epstein in ~2007 was appointed to trumps administration until he had to resign over this stuff in 2018. Similarly trump (and sunak) rolling back climate change agreements is poor and both were kicked out at the following election. None of this would make him (trump) suitable to be a world leader which is what the thread was about and what you posted at the start.

I guess you have your own views about what the nonsense you refer to is, but youve mentioned it a couple of times as well as making other remarks, so time to stop.
(edited 2 months ago)
Original post by mqb2766
You really should stop making remarks about others contributions and back up your views with information. In the wiki epstein there are many references to trumps relationship with epstein over more than 10 years, his "wingman". There is nothing about deception. The guy in charge of making a plea deal with epstein in ~2007 was appointed to trumps administration until he had to resign over this stuff in 2018. Similarly trump (and sunak) rolling back climate change agreements is poor and both were kicked out at the following election. None of this would make him (trump) suitable to be a world leader which is what the thread was about and what you posted at the start.
I guess you have your own views about what the nonsense you refer to is, but youve mentioned it a couple of times as well as making other remarks, so time to stop.

Ok. Thanks for the challenge. You are right.
Reply 26
Original post by Wired_1800
Ok. Thanks for the challenge. You are right.

ok.
Could this world prime minister be Jeremy Corbyn? He’s always been much more popular than Trump.
Reply 28
Original post by Wired_1800
President Trump being a world President would care about the planet ad that would be his country, he would be “Earth First”.
I disagree that he is a rapist. Most powerful people were deceived by Epstein.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
I think he needed no help from Epstein!
You claim to want women to feel safe in their own country but Trump is hardly leading by example on that one is he.Not to mention his pledge to ban abortion completely.Men dictating to women what they can and cannot do with their own bodies is not making women feel safe.
Climate emergency is real and imminent. Do real change has to happen fast.Britain imports most of its stuff from India and China so we can stop the holier than thou crap.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2021/02/06/why-we-re-all-to-blame-for-china-and-india-s-filthy-co2-emissions
Original post by Scotney
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
I think he needed no help from Epstein!
You claim to want women to feel safe in their own country but Trump is hardly leading by example on that one is he.Not to mention his pledge to ban abortion completely.Men dictating to women what they can and cannot do with their own bodies is not making women feel safe.
Climate emergency is real and imminent. Do real change has to happen fast.Britain imports most of its stuff from India and China so we can stop the holier than thou crap.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2021/02/06/why-we-re-all-to-blame-for-china-and-india-s-filthy-co2-emissions

The Carroll case was a civil one that Trump is appealing. I understand that you dislike for him would see you latch on to anything that puts him in a bad light.

A woman feeling safe in her country does not mean giving her the right to end the life of another individual through abortion. This is one of the wicked ideas that has been perpetuated for decades. It is insane that some women seem to demand the ability to decide over life or death for another individual.

It is not holier than thou. There is clear evidence that Britain has cleaned up its act with her progress on climate change. Where should we import our goods if not from China or India. If we stop doing business with them, you would probably be one of those who would start attacking the Tories for ruining the economy through poor trade.
Reply 30
Original post by Wired_1800
The Carroll case was a civil one that Trump is appealing. I understand that you dislike for him would see you latch on to anything that puts him in a bad light.
A woman feeling safe in her country does not mean giving her the right to end the life of another individual through abortion. This is one of the wicked ideas that has been perpetuated for decades. It is insane that some women seem to demand the ability to decide over life or death for another individual.
It is not holier than thou. There is clear evidence that Britain has cleaned up its act with her progress on climate change. Where should we import our goods if not from China or India. If we stop doing business with them, you would probably be one of those who would start attacking the Tories for ruining the economy through poor trade.

No I wouldn't.People need to realise we need so much less stuff for starters.
Trump has no respect for women personally or politically so why would I find him an attractive prospect as a leader.
It is the woman's body and she has the right to choose whether to have the child or not.It is just men trying to control women who think otherwise.
Reply 31
Original post by nonchalant-
The world is obsessed with trump and America. Highly influential. But no, I think people should be more focused on their own country. People seem to know more about America than their own.
I also think American media platforms should be just for America, shared with Canada. And limited to the rest of the world.

The funny thing is they think they do and really don't. There is so much false and out of touch stuff in the other US election related threads on this site.

To answer the OP, no, I don't think it would be a helpful thing to have one person or group rule over thousands of different cultures and religions.. separation is necessary for government and institutions to reflect their people.
Reply 32
Original post by Scotney
No I wouldn't.People need to realise we need so much less stuff for starters.
Trump has no respect for women personally or politically so why would I find him an attractive prospect as a leader.
It is the woman's body and she has the right to choose whether to have the child or not.It is just men trying to control women who think otherwise.

Id not attack the tories as theyve been kicked out.

The "you would probably be one of those" is playing the person. Again. Tiresome.
(edited 2 months ago)
Original post by Scotney
No I wouldn't.People need to realise we need so much less stuff for starters.
Trump has no respect for women personally or politically so why would I find him an attractive prospect as a leader.
It is the woman's body and she has the right to choose whether to have the child or not.It is just men trying to control women who think otherwise.

Yes, we do need fewer things, but whose going to be the person to start the movement? Would you and your family kickstart the trend and get rid of your stuff? I have had this discussion with people IRL and many don't seem to want to be the ones to take the hit.

President Trump has respect for women. It is the lying media that has created a wicked narrative that he hates women which is not true.

I disagree with your last point but the abortion debate is a never-ending one. So i will leave it there
Perhaps Wired will explain how the comment "grab them by the pussy" is respectful to women as part of their next circular back and forth. Thrilling stuff!

Anyway, Corbyn is the right-leaning, capitalist World PM we need during these times. Nothing but respect for my PM!
Original post by Admit-One
Perhaps Wired will explain how the comment "grab them by the pussy" is respectful to women as part of their next circular back and forth. Thrilling stuff!
Anyway, Corbyn is the right-leaning, capitalist World PM we need during these times. Nothing but respect for my PM!

I listened to the full audio and what the President said was not as crazed as the media tried to portray it. In the shortened format, I agree that it sounded wild. Please watch the full recording.

I did not choose Comrade Corbyn because he sadly was never PM.
(edited 2 months ago)
Reply 36
Original post by Admit-One
Perhaps Wired will explain how the comment "grab them by the pussy" is respectful to women as part of their next circular back and forth. Thrilling stuff!
Anyway, Corbyn is the right-leaning, capitalist World PM we need during these times. Nothing but respect for my PM!

Looks like the transcript of the video is as creepy as the soundbite
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37595321

If the choice is between trump, putin and corbyn, Id go for blofeld as he likes cats.
(edited 2 months ago)
Original post by mqb2766
Looks like the transcript of the video is as creepy as the soundbite
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37595321

Strange, Wired said it was out of context but the entire transcript portrays him in an even worse light. Still, Wired is a big Andrew Tate fan so I'm sure they'll explain how this is a perfectly normal way to talk about women.

Wired, could you explain under what context you enjoy the phrase "I moved on her like a b*tch"?
Original post by mqb2766
If the choice is between trump, putin and corbyn, Id go for blofeld as he likes cats.


As a multiple cat owner myself, I agree!
Reply 38
Original post by Admit-One
Strange, Wired said it was out of context but the entire transcript portrays him in an even worse light. Still, Wired is a big Andrew Tate fan so I'm sure they'll explain how this is a perfectly normal way to talk about women.
Wired, could you explain under what context you enjoy the phrase "I moved on her like a b*tch"?
As a multiple cat owner myself, I agree!

He did take her out furniture shopping. He must have been after a (one) nightstand.
Original post by mqb2766
He did take her out furniture shopping. He must have been after a (one) nightstand.


:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:

Quick Reply