Should there be world prime minister who will run world government???

Strange, Wired said it was out of context but the entire transcript portrays him in an even worse light. Still, Wired is a big Andrew Tate fan so I'm sure they'll explain how this is a perfectly normal way to talk about women.
Wired, could you explain under what context you enjoy the phrase "I moved on her like a b*tch"?
As a multiple cat owner myself, I agree!

They were poor choice of words but that was in 2005 and we need to appreciate that society has evolved since then. I have watched the full clip several times and I could not find any malice towards women. The President likes attractive women like most men, nothing new there.

@Admit-One I didn't listen to the transcript. Can you please quote in full any phrases or sentences in that transcript where Trump was mysogynistic ?

It's a transcript. You don't listen to it by virtue of the fact it's a transcript.
And no, I can't.

It's a transcript. You don't listen to it by virtue of the fact it's a transcript.
And no, I can't.

Yes, we do need fewer things, but whose going to be the person to start the movement? Would you and your family kickstart the trend and get rid of your stuff? I have had this discussion with people IRL and many don't seem to want to be the ones to take the hit.
President Trump has respect for women. It is the lying media that has created a wicked narrative that he hates women which is not true.
I disagree with your last point but the abortion debate is a never-ending one. So i will leave it there

For some reason, quite a few places have created lists of his "comments" about/to women
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-worst-offensive-comments-quotes/

Okay I should have said read.

Either way, you have claimed that Trump made malicious comments regarding women in the transcript, but refute to quote any examples of this from the transcript.

Considering this was almost 20 years ago, I'm not sure why you care so much either way.

Apology accepted.
I presume you mean refuse rather than refute.
It's a very short transcript and littered with examples. Not sure a summary is necessary, as it would literally be the whole transcript verbatim.
It's a joke thread about a world PM. Given that roughly half the world's population is female, it seems that Trump's documented attitudes to women might be relevant when considering a candidate. Please note that I did not link to the transcript in order to support my case.

I'd argue that the policies stated by both candidates and their projected abilities to deliver these are more important than comments made decades ago.

Already doing it.Buying less clothes or buying second hand.Not having a car.I admit it helps to live in London I still have a front garden instead of paving it over for a drive I have grass and pollinator friendly plants.Grow some of my own fruit and veg.Do not replace things until to they break or worn out .

Not sure how this conversation has segmented to Trump. Not everyone is perfect. Haven't read them all, but the article is full of BS.
1980s was 40 years ago.
1990 what's the big deal?
1991 so what?
2004 what's wrong with that?
2006 poor joke.
October 2020 what's wrong with calling someone a monster?
When you are one of the most influential men in American history, all your words will be analysed and anything will be framed to make you look bad.
@Wired_1800

This might be slightly off topic, but I'd be interested in hearing how some of the Trump supporters on here feel about Kamala Harris going against Trump. Considering how defensive some people have been over Trump's very obviously disrespectful comments towards women, I'm wondering how they would feel if Harris were to potentially win the election. Personally, while I think some of her opinions and attitudes towards tackling crime are questionable, I think she's a far better candidate than Biden and has a better chance at beating Trump in the election than Biden did, due to an increase in youth support and likely an increase in youth turnout this year.
In regard to the original question OP, no, there should not be a world prime minister or a world government. It's one thing to have different political parties with different ideological beliefs operating in a singular country, but it's another to apply this to the world. I doubt a world government would even be able to pass any legislation or make any policies. You have to acknowledge how many countries in the world are in conflict with each other. Having a world prime minister could very well lead to anarchy in certain regions.

Didn't the Romans already try this with their Roman Empire across the globe? Such a move wouldn't even last a few years before continents and countries break away and declare independence.

A strong President like Trump or Putin wont tolerate such treason.

They might try to rein in countries with military action, like the Soviet Union did in the 1960s, but they can't have a civil war with half of the World. Humanity would become like a Mad Max desert and wasteland, with nomads travelling on half broken cars and bikes.

Okay I should have said read.
Either way, you have claimed that Trump made malicious comments regarding women in the transcript, but refute to quote any examples of this from the transcript. Considering this was almost 20 years ago, I'm not sure why you care so much either way.