These kind of functions are new to me or at least I’ve not recalled doing these previously.

I need some clarification..

Example question: x³+3x²-2

So I differentiate it and equate to zero and find that the stationary points are 0 and -2…

I understand that convex has the shape of a valley, if I imagine the line of two points above as a water level. So this is above the function line of the valley is my function.

So, I apply the second derivative and find that x=0 tells me that’s a local minimum and x=-2 is a local max….

The material that I am using tells me that a convex interval for all x is when the second derivative >0…..

So, the interval should be x>=0?

I am a little confused because the worked material on here tells me it’s x>=-1 but when I tested that, the answer was 0..

Edit: x=0.5 is positive, ahhh, wait I see my error x>-1 not >=1 🙂

Okay, so x>-1 is correct. It's that simple then?

Their working:

My working:

I drew part of the graph to get a better grasp

I need some clarification..

Example question: x³+3x²-2

So I differentiate it and equate to zero and find that the stationary points are 0 and -2…

I understand that convex has the shape of a valley, if I imagine the line of two points above as a water level. So this is above the function line of the valley is my function.

So, I apply the second derivative and find that x=0 tells me that’s a local minimum and x=-2 is a local max….

The material that I am using tells me that a convex interval for all x is when the second derivative >0…..

So, the interval should be x>=0?

I am a little confused because the worked material on here tells me it’s x>=-1 but when I tested that, the answer was 0..

Edit: x=0.5 is positive, ahhh, wait I see my error x>-1 not >=1 🙂

Okay, so x>-1 is correct. It's that simple then?

Their working:

My working:

I drew part of the graph to get a better grasp

(edited 1 month ago)

Original post by KingRich

These kind of functions are new to me or at least I’ve not recalled doing these previously.

I need some clarification..

Example question: x³+3x²-2

So I differentiate it and equate to zero and find that the stationary points are 0 and -2…

I understand that convex has the shape of a valley, if I imagine the line of two points above as a water level. So this is above the function line of the valley is my function.

So, I apply the second derivative and find that x=0 tells me that’s a local minimum and x=-2 is a local max….

The material that I am using tells me that a convex interval for all x is when the second derivative >0…..

So, the interval should be x>0?

I am a little confused because the worked material on here tells me it’s x>=-1 but when I tested that, the answer was 0..

I need some clarification..

Example question: x³+3x²-2

So I differentiate it and equate to zero and find that the stationary points are 0 and -2…

I understand that convex has the shape of a valley, if I imagine the line of two points above as a water level. So this is above the function line of the valley is my function.

So, I apply the second derivative and find that x=0 tells me that’s a local minimum and x=-2 is a local max….

The material that I am using tells me that a convex interval for all x is when the second derivative >0…..

So, the interval should be x>0?

I am a little confused because the worked material on here tells me it’s x>=-1 but when I tested that, the answer was 0..

If 2nd deriv > 0 then 6x + 6 > 0 so ....

Original post by Muttley79

If 2nd deriv > 0 then 6x + 6 > 0 so ....

I just edited as I was misreading it

Original post by Muttley79

If 2nd deriv > 0 then 6x + 6 > 0 so ....

Hold a second. I don’t need to find the x routes, do I? As I’ve found the second derivative to be 6x+6, This is this the information required to clarify the interval? As you pointed out 6x+6>0, x>-1,

So if it asked me to find concave it would be x<-1 ?

Original post by KingRich

Hold a second. I don’t need to find the x routes, do I? As I’ve found the second derivative to be 6x+6, This is this the information required to clarify the interval? As you pointed out 6x+6>0, x>-1,

So if it asked me to find concave it would be x<-1 ?

So if it asked me to find concave it would be x<-1 ?

You know a lot from the equation of the curve as the x^3 term is positive, you know the y axis intercept and the stationary points so can sketch from that.

Yes to the question.

Original post by Muttley79

You know a lot from the equation of the curve as the x^3 term is positive, you know the y axis intercept and the stationary points so can sketch from that.

Yes to the question.

Yes to the question.

For this question attached. As you pointed out, an equation to a graph can give a lot of information.

So, based on that.

Would this be correct?

Original post by KingRich

For this question attached. As you pointed out, an equation to a graph can give a lot of information.

So, based on that.

Would this be correct?

So, based on that.

Would this be correct?

I'd probably write a bit more to show where I got the inequlity values from but looks OK otherwise.

Original post by Muttley79

I'd probably write a bit more to show where I got the inequlity values from but looks OK otherwise.

Nice. I was writing it at the bottom and then I figured huh, I think the equation is self explanatory lol.

I would have applied the factor theorem to find the x

Values for the first derivative.

And then plugged them into the second derivative as I did previously. Is this the best way to approach this question?

I considered using second derivative like the previous question but I wasn’t sure how I’d approach it?

If I solved the x’s and said x=-1 and x=1/3

Could I then just write when x=-1, dy²/dx²<0… etc

Original post by KingRich

Nice. I was writing it at the bottom and then I figured huh, I think the equation is self explanatory lol.

I would have applied the factor theorem to find the x

Values for the first derivative.

And then plugged them into the second derivative as I did previously. Is this the best way to approach this question?

I considered using second derivative like the previous question but I wasn’t sure how I’d approach it?

If I solved the x’s and said x=-1 and x=1/3

Could I then just write when x=-1, dy²/dx²<0… etc

I would have applied the factor theorem to find the x

Values for the first derivative.

And then plugged them into the second derivative as I did previously. Is this the best way to approach this question?

I considered using second derivative like the previous question but I wasn’t sure how I’d approach it?

If I solved the x’s and said x=-1 and x=1/3

Could I then just write when x=-1, dy²/dx²<0… etc

I did it the same wsy as before - you get a quadratic for the second derivative so solve it and get values - then I sketched the quadratic and found when > 0 and when < 0

Original post by Muttley79

I did it the same wsy as before - you get a quadratic for the second derivative so solve it and get values - then I sketched the quadratic and found when > 0 and when < 0

Nice 🙂 thank you for clarification.

Original post by KingRich

Nice 🙂 thank you for clarification.

No problem

- Need help with this calculus question
- Differentiation help - points of inflection
- Lse Economics and Economic history…help please
- Intersection
- WJEC A-level Mathematics Unit 3 (1300U30-1) - 4th June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Can someone help ms in this limit problem
- Politics and Economics at LSE vs pure Economics at Edinburgh
- Economics bSc without A level maths?!
- Acces to he for optom
- Hölders inequality proof
- Convex question
- OCR GCSE Physics A Paper 4 Higher - 14 June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Mathematics - Functions
- AQA A-level Further Maths Required Trig Functions?
- Discrete maths questions
- Stuck on Idea Silver badge Maker Activation
- Homologous series in general
- IDEA Silver Badge 'The Digital Adventurer'
- Composite Functions
- A level maths help

Latest

Trending

Last reply 1 month ago

STEP 2 in 2024: Sharing Your Story! [PLUS WITH SOME SOLUTIONS AND PREDICTION]Maths

20

81