The Student Room Group

Should I attend bath

I just had the worst time of my life. I had predicted three As but somehow managed to get ABB. I was supposed to go to Manchester for accounting and finance but got rejected. However I got an offer from Bath for Accounting and Finance. Should I attend Bath or take a gap year? Is it a better choice than Manchester for Accounting and finance?
Reply 1
Original post by afraz ahmed
I just had the worst time of my life. I had predicted three As but somehow managed to get ABB. I was supposed to go to Manchester for accounting and finance but got rejected. However I got an offer from Bath for Accounting and Finance. Should I attend Bath or take a gap year? Is it a better choice than Manchester for Accounting and finance?

are you talking about uni of bath? if so, uob is great! top ten uk uni you cannot go wrong. higher ranked than manchester, however manchester is not far behind so both very solid choices. can I ask if you got the bath offer through clearing?
Reply 2
Original post by nabihaaa
are you talking about uni of bath? if so, uob is great! top ten uk uni you cannot go wrong. higher ranked than manchester, however manchester is not far behind so both very solid choices. can I ask if you got the bath offer through clearing?
Yes the UNI of BATH and no some how miraculously I got in on my grades not clearing. However I think they have spaces in clearing. Better look it up. and TYSM for the reply. Means a lot
(edited 1 month ago)
Hey! I'm going to bath for econ this year (was meant to go last year but ended up taking a gap year and doing an internship), and figured I might as well quote some stats/info to help put your mind at ease, as I'm assuming that you've not had the time to do extensive research on bath. I'm assuming you want to go into accounting/corporate finance/professional &financial services in general post graduation btw:

I'm just going to talk from the academic / career aspect rather than the social side as well, as that can be talked about after your feelings of security in your desirability from employers are taken care of:

Rankings (I know general rankings aren't the holy grail ofc, and their criteria places preference to unis in large cities that focus on research, especially in international rankings, rather than course quality, but they do have some use to an extent):

CUG: 8th
Guardian: 6th
Sunday Times: 8th
Guardian for career prospects: 5th
QS World: 148th (top 10%)
CUG for A&F specifically: 2nd (only behind LSE, and let's be real, LSE is never going to move from that spot)

Was Sunday Times University of the Year 2012 & 2023 (Bath and Oxford are the only two unis to receive this award twice btw)

Daily Mail University of the Year for Graduate Jobs 2024

One of only 8 universities to have never left the top 15 ranking across CUG, Guardian and Sunday Times (other than oxbridge, lse, ucl, imperial, st andrews, warwick) for 10 years

Bath's academic USP is its placement program (2/3 students go on a placement year), and it has the best placement program in the country (as they know how important it is to build tangible experience as early as possible)


To relieve any qualms about graduate prospects:

I've worked as a finance/consulting intern at an established mid-tier firm, and whenever I told a colleague/director/MD/partner that I was going to bath in sept, I was always met with "congratulations that's a top uni, produces a lot of strong grads that go into finance" or comments to that effect

Go onto linkedin and look for analysts/associates that work in finance/consulting, and you'll see a plethora that work in bulge bracket banks and top financial firms (GS,JPM,MS,UBS, HSBC, Barclays, Big 4, MBB etc)

Do any related searches on bath grad employability / finance reputation / bath for finance careers etc, and you'll see dozens of articles with bath are some of the most sought after for grads (after the G5 and warwick ofc)


Then the hard to avoid (and misguided) statement of "[insert RG uni]/manchester is RG and bath isn't, so manchester is better than bath".

RG is self selecting, so no 3rd party is deciding unis to decide which one is "good enough" for it
RG is essentially a group of unis that place extreme emphasis on pumping out research (that does not benefit the learning of undergrads - it is to push out into the relevant academic sectors to say "our uni found this ground-breaking research" more than anything

critieria for joining is pushing out lots of research in a wide area of subjects. Bath is essentially a STEM/specialist school (you'll notice how it doesn't offer english/history/law/music/the arts etc), so it doesn't have the scope for wide research anyway, but you'll see, like with st andrews, the subjects it does offer, they place within the top 10 almost all of the time

RG also benefit from being placed higher in rankings as they tend to be bigger, so more research can be pushed out, and one of the criteria that heavily influence rankings is amount of research pushed out

uni that does lots of research =/= great course with great employer connections with ample support


Just remember, warwick is now getting replaced by coventry as a RG, and does this now mean warwick is automatically worse, and no one should go there anymore because it isn't RG anymore? obviously not

statement 2 - "[insert high%*] of grads recruited by top employers are RG" *logically extending the point* therefore to have the best chance at these jobs, i have to go to an RG uni/ I'm doomed if I don't go to one:

Articles say this all the time, but what they always fail to mention is A. of the top 20 unis in the country, the majority of them are RG so of course they are going to be disproportionately represented in grad roles where the firms in question typically intake from the top 10-20 schools, and B. that the distribution of RG intake is not evenly distributed across the 24 schools. for point A, it's the equivalent logic to being surprised that private school students are 7% of the population of age 7-18 students, but take up a disproportionately large cohort at top unis - parents pay for these schools that produce better results on average compared to the average state school, and so will occupy more places at top unis, which tend to have higher entry requirements by default. The statement is completely expected, and it doesn't make sense why this is being published like it should be a surprise when it really shouldn't be.

For point B, these articles make it seem like all 24 RG unis are created equal when it comes to these stats, but of the RG intake for these roles, it is heavily skewed towards the G5 and Warwick (and then Bristol, Durham, Notts, and maybe KCL and Exeter after) e.g. of 100 RG grads into these roles, 50-60 are going to be from G5+Warwick first, then the others quoted, and the rest of them afterwards. By this logic, you are better off going to Queen uni befalst/Newcastle/Cardiff/QMUL/Southampton/Sheffield over bath for a finance related job, which is completely false - going off course quality and brand/name reputation in finance industry, bath clears all of them by a country mile.

TLDR: bath is one of the best unis all around in the country, and is especially strong for business school related courses, you'll be fine mate

feel free to ask any questions / dm me 🙂
Reply 4
Original post by tbest3769
Hey! I'm going to bath for econ this year (was meant to go last year but ended up taking a gap year and doing an internship), and figured I might as well quote some stats/info to help put your mind at ease, as I'm assuming that you've not had the time to do extensive research on bath. I'm assuming you want to go into accounting/corporate finance/professional &financial services in general post graduation btw:
I'm just going to talk from the academic / career aspect rather than the social side as well, as that can be talked about after your feelings of security in your desirability from employers are taken care of:
Rankings (I know general rankings aren't the holy grail ofc, and their criteria places preference to unis in large cities that focus on research, especially in international rankings, rather than course quality, but they do have some use to an extent):
CUG: 8th
Guardian: 6th
Sunday Times: 8th
Guardian for career prospects: 5th
QS World: 148th (top 10%)
CUG for A&F specifically: 2nd (only behind LSE, and let's be real, LSE is never going to move from that spot)

Was Sunday Times University of the Year 2012 & 2023 (Bath and Oxford are the only two unis to receive this award twice btw)

Daily Mail University of the Year for Graduate Jobs 2024

One of only 8 universities to have never left the top 15 ranking across CUG, Guardian and Sunday Times (other than oxbridge, lse, ucl, imperial, st andrews, warwick) for 10 years

Bath's academic USP is its placement program (2/3 students go on a placement year), and it has the best placement program in the country (as they know how important it is to build tangible experience as early as possible)


To relieve any qualms about graduate prospects:

I've worked as a finance/consulting intern at an established mid-tier firm, and whenever I told a colleague/director/MD/partner that I was going to bath in sept, I was always met with "congratulations that's a top uni, produces a lot of strong grads that go into finance" or comments to that effect

Go onto linkedin and look for analysts/associates that work in finance/consulting, and you'll see a plethora that work in bulge bracket banks and top financial firms (GS,JPM,MS,UBS, HSBC, Barclays, Big 4, MBB etc)

Do any related searches on bath grad employability / finance reputation / bath for finance careers etc, and you'll see dozens of articles with bath are some of the most sought after for grads (after the G5 and warwick ofc)


Then the hard to avoid (and misguided) statement of "[insert RG uni]/manchester is RG and bath isn't, so manchester is better than bath".

RG is self selecting, so no 3rd party is deciding unis to decide which one is "good enough" for it
RG is essentially a group of unis that place extreme emphasis on pumping out research (that does not benefit the learning of undergrads - it is to push out into the relevant academic sectors to say "our uni found this ground-breaking research" more than anything

critieria for joining is pushing out lots of research in a wide area of subjects. Bath is essentially a STEM/specialist school (you'll notice how it doesn't offer english/history/law/music/the arts etc), so it doesn't have the scope for wide research anyway, but you'll see, like with st andrews, the subjects it does offer, they place within the top 10 almost all of the time

RG also benefit from being placed higher in rankings as they tend to be bigger, so more research can be pushed out, and one of the criteria that heavily influence rankings is amount of research pushed out

uni that does lots of research =/= great course with great employer connections with ample support


Just remember, warwick is now getting replaced by coventry as a RG, and does this now mean warwick is automatically worse, and no one should go there anymore because it isn't RG anymore? obviously not
statement 2 - "[insert high%*] of grads recruited by top employers are RG" *logically extending the point* therefore to have the best chance at these jobs, i have to go to an RG uni/ I'm doomed if I don't go to one:
Articles say this all the time, but what they always fail to mention is A. of the top 20 unis in the country, the majority of them are RG so of course they are going to be disproportionately represented in grad roles where the firms in question typically intake from the top 10-20 schools, and B. that the distribution of RG intake is not evenly distributed across the 24 schools. for point A, it's the equivalent logic to being surprised that private school students are 7% of the population of age 7-18 students, but take up a disproportionately large cohort at top unis - parents pay for these schools that produce better results on average compared to the average state school, and so will occupy more places at top unis, which tend to have higher entry requirements by default. The statement is completely expected, and it doesn't make sense why this is being published like it should be a surprise when it really shouldn't be.
For point B, these articles make it seem like all 24 RG unis are created equal when it comes to these stats, but of the RG intake for these roles, it is heavily skewed towards the G5 and Warwick (and then Bristol, Durham, Notts, and maybe KCL and Exeter after) e.g. of 100 RG grads into these roles, 50-60 are going to be from G5+Warwick first, then the others quoted, and the rest of them afterwards. By this logic, you are better off going to Queen uni befalst/Newcastle/Cardiff/QMUL/Southampton/Sheffield over bath for a finance related job, which is completely false - going off course quality and brand/name reputation in finance industry, bath clears all of them by a country mile.
TLDR: bath is one of the best unis all around in the country, and is especially strong for business school related courses, you'll be fine mate
feel free to ask any questions / dm me 🙂

Thank you so much mate for taking out so much if your precious time and writing the entire thing which, btw, I read till the end. Helps and means a lot.
Reply 5
You got an offer for A+F from Bath in clearing? That’s pretty amazing! Well known as being a very good course.
Reply 6
Original post by ajj2000
You got an offer for A+F from Bath in clearing? That’s pretty amazing! Well known as being a very good course.

ok thank you 😃
Original post by afraz ahmed
Thank you so much mate for taking out so much if your precious time and writing the entire thing which, btw, I read till the end. Helps and means a lot.


No worries mate, glad I could help :smile:

Quick Reply