•
Explain the design argument, often associated with the teleological argument.
•
Clearly state your position on the argument. Are you critiquing it, supporting it, ...
•
Paragraph 1: Present the basics of the design argument. Historically, figures like William Paley, who likened the universe to a watch, might be mentioned here.
•
Paragraph 2: Discuss major supports for the design argument. For instance, you could explore how perceived patterns and complexities in nature (like the human eye) are used to support the idea of a designer.
•
Paragraph 3: Critique the argument. This could involve discussing critiques such as David Hume’s, who argues that complexity does not necessarily imply design, or bringing up problems like the argument from poor design.
•
Paragraph 4: Consider modern perspectives or scientific viewpoints, such as those from evolutionary biology, that challenge or reinterpret the design argument.
•
Paragraph 5: Discuss the implications of accepting or rejecting the design argument, both philosophically and practically.
•
recap the main arguments discussed and reiterate your thesis.
•
End with a thought-provoking statement or question
•
Explain the design argument, often associated with the teleological argument.
•
Clearly state your position on the argument. Are you critiquing it, supporting it, ...
•
Paragraph 1: Present the basics of the design argument. Historically, figures like William Paley, who likened the universe to a watch, might be mentioned here.
•
Paragraph 2: Discuss major supports for the design argument. For instance, you could explore how perceived patterns and complexities in nature (like the human eye) are used to support the idea of a designer.
•
Paragraph 3: Critique the argument. This could involve discussing critiques such as David Hume’s, who argues that complexity does not necessarily imply design, or bringing up problems like the argument from poor design.
•
Paragraph 4: Consider modern perspectives or scientific viewpoints, such as those from evolutionary biology, that challenge or reinterpret the design argument.
•
Paragraph 5: Discuss the implications of accepting or rejecting the design argument, both philosophically and practically.
•
recap the main arguments discussed and reiterate your thesis.
•
End with a thought-provoking statement or question
Last reply 3 days ago
OCR A Level Religious Studies 2024 predictions!!!Last reply 5 days ago
OCR Religious studies AS levelLast reply 1 week ago
AQA A Level Religious Studies (7062/1) - 10th June 2024 [Exam Chat]Posted 2 weeks ago
Can anyone take a look at my ethics mock essayLast reply 4 weeks ago
Eduqas A Level Religious studies 2024Last reply 1 month ago
A-level Philosophy preparationLast reply 3 months ago
AQA GCSE Religious Studies A Paper 1 (8062/ 11-17) - 9th May 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 3 months ago
OCR A-level Religious Studies Paper 2 (H573/02) - 17th June 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 3 months ago
OCR A-level Religious Studies Paper 3 (Buddhism) - 20th June 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 3 months ago
Religious studies eduqas A-level A02 30 marker structure helpLast reply 3 months ago
OCR A-level Religious Studies Paper 1 (H573/01) - 10th June 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 3 months ago
Eduqas religious studies 2024Last reply 4 months ago
AQA A-level Philosophy Paper 2 (7582/2) - 22nd May 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 4 months ago
AQA A-level Philosophy Paper 1 (7582/1) - 16th May 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 4 months ago
AQA GCSE Religious Studies A Paper 2 (8062/2A-2B) - 16th May 2024 [Exam Chat]Last reply 4 months ago
AQA GCSE Religious Studies Short course (05/01/8061) - 16th May 2024 [Exam Chat]