Long division? No, that is a route to madness as it's never needed even at A level
Polynomial long division is in the OCR A, OCR B MEI, Edexcel and AQA Mathematics Advanced Level specifications - please get your facts checked before you provide information on here.
You misquote me - where did I say it wasn/t on the spec and we are discussing GCSE factorising wherer it certiainly isn't. I said it wasn't needed - every question can be done without using it! Post a question requiring it please?
'It's never needed even at A Level'
I have got questions last year that were from MEI past papers as extensions that required the use of polynomial long division to factorise cubics, so using factor theorem as working wouldn't work.
An example: Use long division to find the quotient and the remainder when x3+3x2+5x-3 is divided by x + 1. Pretty simple either way. Answer in case you need it: x2 + 2x + 3 and remainder of -6
'It's never needed even at A Level' I have got questions last year that were from MEI past papers as extensions that required the use of polynomial long division to factorise cubics, so using factor theorem as working wouldn't work. An example: Use long division to find the quotient and the remainder when x3+3x2+5x-3 is divided by x + 1. Pretty simple either way. Answer in case you need it: x2 + 2x + 3 and remainder of -6
I'm just confused at this point, I have no idea what anyone is talking about i know I say I'll leave but it makes me really sad people are still arguing.
'It's never needed even at A Level' I have got questions last year that were from MEI past papers as extensions that required the use of polynomial long division to factorise cubics, so using factor theorem as working wouldn't work. An example: Use long division to find the quotient and the remainder when x3+3x2+5x-3 is divided by x + 1. Pretty simple either way. Answer in case you need it: x2 + 2x + 3 and remainder of -6
Show me the paper that question is on - they cannot specifiy a method like that since the new spec.
I'm just confused at this point, I have no idea what anyone is talking about i know I say I'll leave but it makes me really sad people are still arguing.
I'm just confused at this point, I have no idea what anyone is talking about i know I say I'll leave but it makes me really sad people are still arguing.
Your comment is the one that renders me addled... all I see is but discussion, not a hint of arguement.
LOL I just read through this thread wondering why there are 74 posts about quadratics. So amusing to see 😂 Some people can't give it up. I'm very sorry @Mr_Pizza@EeveeSAMA@sdfj
LOL I just read through this thread wondering why there are 74 posts about quadratics. So amusing to see 😂 Some people can't give it up. I'm very sorry @Mr_Pizza@EeveeSAMA@sdfj @EeveeSAMA, there's better parts to this site than Muttley and toxic arguments so I encourage you not to leave the site entirely. Report, don't engage, move in.
Please don't read if you think you'll get offended
Interesting... one of my posts here got declined? I didn't do anything wrong!
I reported them saying they are angering people to making them leave (for urgency) so they actually do something.
I advise against this. Just move on, they're a frank & thorough teacher, someone who is supposed to be there to support you. It's best not to take action in the digital world against those who are lightly being hollow to you, in your times of desperate need. I re-read the whole post, and I find almost nothing wrong with it. He was simply trying to state things, which I can see might not please you, but the perspective was a completely different angle. (Note: This message is to all and is to invoke not to create any conflict in any form, it only devolves.)
Have a look at the OCR MEI specification before harassing me about it. Get you're facts straight - you're a teacher.
Again, where did I say it wasn't on the spec but you NEVER need to use the method. You can use grid method instead to get the answer - this has been run past the exam board btw.
Find an exam question that insists on long division set since 2017
Again, where did I say it wasn't on the spec but you NEVER need to use the method. You can use grid method instead to get the answer - this has been run past the exam board btw. Find an exam question that insists on long division set since 2017
The question specifically asks for long division to be used - seen in the mark scheme too.
I never said it wasn't on the spec - point to the post where I said that? I said it wasn't needed which it isn't - of course I teach it but show the better approaches e.g. grid method.