Scroll to see replies
Reply 1
Reply 2
Reply 3
Reply 4
Reply 5
Reply 6
Reply 7
Reply 8
Reply 9
Reply 10
Reply 11
Reply 12
Reply 13
Reply 14
Reply 15
Reply 16
Reply 17
Reply 18
1.
I am someone who does a contrast subject and so I would be eligible for both more STEM based courses as well as humanity/essay based courses such as Law or Politics so I'm not entirely sure that just because someone got into an English access programme means they have a low chance of doing a STEM combination. The clearest example of this is law where most unis don't require any a levels except maybe an essay subject which is also very subjective. Maths Physics Econ is a very popular combination and I know a few people who do politics with physics as well.
2.
I never said they abused the system. I know for a fact that people can apply to do an outreach programme for one thing and then apply for a contextual offer in something totally different. The issue does not arise from someone applying to do something like physics or maths and then switching to aerospace, it will be from definitively less popular, not related courses that is the issue. The person I know who got a contextual offer did not "abuse" it. They managed to get into an outreach programme for something, then utilised their contextual offer for the EXACT same course. I am aware people like this exist. That being said, you're not doing the wrong thing exactly by deploying your offer for a different course. It isn't morally or ethically wrong.
3.
Of course they're inspiring, I think you've taken my words too harshly. Bristol has a reputation (in aerospace) similar to that of Imperial and Oxbridge both of whom are (increasingly) moving to accommodate more state school candidates and contextual candidates with extenuating circumstances. The issue comes from this exactly which is that if it goes too far and they admit too many contextual candidates, it hurts the reputation of the university. The fact is Imperial looks like it is never going to do this as an Imperial offer holder is relatively difficult to come by and mostly their aerospace offers have all been A*A*A* and Oxford (I'm not sure about Cambridge sorry) makes it fair by considering cGCSE when considering who to interview and the interview process is more thought process based rather than knowledge based. But the Oxford offer will be the same A*A*A regardless of how much context one has. The issue with Bristol is that gaining a place on an outreach programme is very doable for those who need it and had Bristol checked all contextual data (I know someone who lied who now has a contextual offer for no reason) and made sure that the course applied for at the outreach programme is the SAME course that the applicant is made an offer for, I'd have far less issues. I have no problem allowing candidates with a real passion for aerospace into institutions like Bristol but not at the cost of candidates who actually want to go there AND have near perfect grades.
Reply 19
Last reply 2 months ago
What spec laptop would I need for aerospace engineering?Last reply 7 months ago
Oxford or Cambridge Engineering - worth applying without further maths?4
22
To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.