The Student Room Group

Scientist Training Programme (STP) Applicants 2025

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1180

Is it definitely 2 interviews per post or 3 interviews per post. For example is it likely that it could be a bit in between and they add a few more on? Like cardiac science, somewhere between 2 per post (80) and (120)? Trying to work out where the cut off is and how likely I am to get an interview?

Reply 1181

Original post
by Stefano1981
Well, let's esaminate the worst scenario:
At the first available interview they are going to call the first three candidates in line (1st, 2nd, 3rd). If the place is offered and accepted straight away (to anyone of those candidates), at the second interview only three of the first four candidates will be available. Let's say the 2nd has been offered a place (and that they also accepted), then at the second interview there will be the 1st, the 3rd and the 4th candidate... And so on for every next available interview.
In this case, that doesn't take in consideration the candidates preferred areas, if there are N places available and they interview M people each, only the first N+M-1 candidates would be interviewed.
This is the lower bound in the worst scenario. Keep this in mind and don't boil your brain anymore.

This isn't how it works. They interview as many numbers of people as they want, rerank them and THEN assign people their first available location choice moving down the ranks

Reply 1182

Hey, anyone else shortlist reserve for clinical micro? I’m ranked 29th so initially was quite disheartened but then if it was three interviewees per post for this specialism which had 9 places then I wasn’t far off! Not sure if I should presume that I won’t get invited to interview or to keep some hope lol

Reply 1183

Original post
by Lilyo
What's going on with Genomics posts?? They were 18 then 17 literally just earlier today and now 16!! It looks like Salisbury post is now gone which was going to be my first choice. 😕

They might have filled posts with in-service candidates

Reply 1184

Original post
by CharleaM
They might have filled posts with in-service candidates

In-service applicants apply through a different route. What's most likely happened is they had to reduce the number of posts for funding or training availability reasons

Reply 1185

Ranked 88 for cardiac science. Does anyone know if I should be hopeful?

Reply 1186

Original post
by Lily_bishop
Is it definitely 2 interviews per post or 3 interviews per post. For example is it likely that it could be a bit in between and they add a few more on? Like cardiac science, somewhere between 2 per post (80) and (120)? Trying to work out where the cut off is and how likely I am to get an interview?

There's no word but my guess is there isn't a set number per post and they've possibly set a score from shortlisting to qualify for interview? That's a complete guess though

Reply 1187

I got ranked 66th for Cancer Genomics, think it's safe to say I won't be reaching interview! How has everyone else done?

Reply 1188

Original post
by jellybaby2017
In-service applicants apply through a different route. What's most likely happened is they had to reduce the number of posts for funding or training availability reasons

Yes but their funding for it comes from the same place, i.e. NSHCS, so if they've asked for funding for 1 post and then given it to someone internal it could then be taken off the direct entry list no?

For instance, NSHCS always include in-service post numbers on the Competition ratios for Scientist Training Programme direct entry posts even though they are different

My department usually does its in-service recruitment in like January time so those posts wouldn't have made it onto the list but I know people who were recruited in-service at other trusts as late as April
(edited 8 months ago)

Reply 1189

Original post
by Aksdkf
Ranked 88 for cardiac science. Does anyone know if I should be hopeful?

Cardiac science has 40 posts, right? If you are shortlisted (reserved), I would say you could be getting a chance for an interview

Reply 1190

Apply some critical thinking to the numbers being shortlisted and shortlist reserve guys. There can’t be a universal cut off for every specialism because what if they have 3 candidates who aren’t separable at this stage? Say they have the same scores across SJT and from longlisting, then what would they do? I also think that the proportion they choose to keep in reserve will vary based on the number of posts available and potentially on how much they think they’ll struggle to fill the places. It’s a complex process with a lot of variables, it is not one size fits all.

I can only imaging it mirrors things like grade boundary allocations for exams like GCSEs and A-Levels. It needs fine tuning every year because the distributions are never quite the same and can’t be exactly predicted. It sucks that we don’t know how it works, but getting obsessive about exactly what your number means won’t help at this stage.

If you have an interview or are on the reserve list just prep as much as you reasonably can. Rankings will be new after interviews, good luck everyone.

Reply 1191

Original post
by ssss1993
Cardiac science has 40 posts, right? If you are shortlisted (reserved), I would say you could be getting a chance for an interview

Oh right that’s given me a slight bit of hope! Fingers crossed

Reply 1192

Original post
by Patsy17
Shortlist reserve rank 16 for 9 posts ?? Make that make sense

what speciality is that for? i wonder if it’s different for different ones

Reply 1193

Original post
by amfst
what speciality is that for? i wonder if it’s different for different ones


It's for neruo, perhaps only interviewing 1 candidate per post ?

Reply 1194

Original post
by CatNapper17
Apply some critical thinking to the numbers being shortlisted and shortlist reserve guys. There can’t be a universal cut off for every specialism because what if they have 3 candidates who aren’t separable at this stage? Say they have the same scores across SJT and from longlisting, then what would they do? I also think that the proportion they choose to keep in reserve will vary based on the number of posts available and potentially on how much they think they’ll struggle to fill the places. It’s a complex process with a lot of variables, it is not one size fits all.
I can only imaging it mirrors things like grade boundary allocations for exams like GCSEs and A-Levels. It needs fine tuning every year because the distributions are never quite the same and can’t be exactly predicted. It sucks that we don’t know how it works, but getting obsessive about exactly what your number means won’t help at this stage.
If you have an interview or are on the reserve list just prep as much as you reasonably can. Rankings will be new after interviews, good luck everyone.

Exactly!

Reply 1195

So the ranking number changes after the interview ?

Reply 1196

Original post
by Alanna112233
So the ranking number changes after the interview ?

yes

Reply 1197

Original post
by camw711
anyone applying for genomic counselling ranked lower than 57? 😂 really not making sense this application process

I’m ranked 36

Reply 1198

Original post
by ssss1993
its 13 now 😕


Which post was removed?

Reply 1199

I ranked 41 for genomics and on reserve list… should I assume that’s me out of the running? I think they’ve shortlisted about 33 people as one of my colleagues was shortlist reserve and ranked 34 but doesn’t want the role anymore due to a better job offer

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.