I really want/need to do an EPQ in physics, so I have two main ideas, that I am trying to decide between.
The first is to do with a Theory of Everything, uniting quantum mechanics and general relativity. I would title it something like "The Great Hunt: On The Search For A Theory Of Everything. Analyse The Past, Present And Future Of Attempts To Unite General Relativity And Quantum Field Theory." The trouble is, I don't know if there is enough to evaluate or decide for myself.
The second is around the idea of a black hole power station. The concept is pretty well attested (Stephen Hawking himself has discussed it), yet there is not much research on it, which in my mind makes it ideal. The problem is, I don't know actually what I would ask. I think it would be about nailing down some logistics, so I may go with something along the lines of "Using calculations and simple diagrams in order to map out the logistic feasibility, evaluate whether it is likely that we will ever achieve a black hole power station, while discussing the benefits and technological challenges of such an endeavour."
What I want to know is, are either of these good ideas? Which is better? Regarding the second, is this phrased well enough?