1.
I see what you mean, is the reason there are 2 C=C bonds because of the different bonds forming as I mentioned earlier such as c=c and c=ch2 so there can be a break in either one of the C=C double bonds?
2.
I understand this, but just to clarify, is the greater positive charge indicating that there are less electrons than before and the same number of protons so there is a stronger force of attraction?
1.
I see what you mean, is the reason there are 2 C=C bonds because of the different bonds forming as I mentioned earlier such as c=c and c=ch2 so there can be a break in either one of the C=C double bonds?
2.
I understand this, but just to clarify, is the greater positive charge indicating that there are less electrons than before and the same number of protons so there is a stronger force of attraction?
1.
Indeed, in theory either carbon-carbon π-bond can break to form new carbon-carbon σ-bonds, joining the monomers.
2.
Essentially yes. More protons per electron means more things in the nucleus pulling the electrons in. Charges just are a very quick way to rationalise this.
1.
Indeed, in theory either carbon-carbon π-bond can break to form new carbon-carbon σ-bonds, joining the monomers.
2.
Essentially yes. More protons per electron means more things in the nucleus pulling the electrons in. Charges just are a very quick way to rationalise this.