The Student Room Group

GCSE English Literature Study Group 2024-25

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60

english is the only subject i cant do. I do eduqas for english, poems im fine bcus i use anki for quotations, it’s just macbeth, Inspector Calls and A christmas carol. I was thinking about just learning grade 9 answers for all themes and characters for all three instead of learning quotations bcus idk how to write them in answer form. Idk what to do but ive got 3 weeks. Pls anyone thats grade 9 help. I’m Predicted 7 7 but im at a 5 6, aiming for 9s.

Reply 61

Original post
by Blinkr

Welcome to the GCSE English Literature Study Group!
:beard::clip::deal::work:

This thread is a place you can connect with fellow students who are also studying English Literature at GCSE. Here we offer a space to support each other support as you prepare for your exams/coursework.
Feel free to share any helpful tips, resources, or advice you find along the way, and share any questions you have about the subject.
Help encourage others, celebrate your achievements, or simply vent when things get a bit overwhelming!
Lil serious note - just a reminder please be aware that sharing or requesting copyrighted materials is against our community guidelines, and moving conversations off-site for this purpose is not allowed. Posts violating these rules will be taken down.
To get started, here are a few questions to break the ice:

Which exam board are you following?

What do you enjoy the most about this subject or course?

What topics within GCSE English Literature do you find most challenging/interesting?


exam board: AQA
what i most enjoy: definitely Macbeth, the context behind each literary piece, and coming up with conecpts for each :smile:
what i find most challenging: probably Power and Conflict Poetry :frown: cant remember most of the quotes/ struggle to engage w the topics in some poems

Reply 62

Original post
by Quinn47
english is the only subject i cant do. I do eduqas for english, poems im fine bcus i use anki for quotations, it’s just macbeth, Inspector Calls and A christmas carol. I was thinking about just learning grade 9 answers for all themes and characters for all three instead of learning quotations bcus idk how to write them in answer form. Idk what to do but ive got 3 weeks. Pls anyone thats grade 9 help. I’m Predicted 7 7 but im at a 5 6, aiming for 9s.

what ive found helpful w Macbeth is learning the context! helps the info and quotes stick bcs it draws the quotes to knowledge you already know... if you have the Oxford School Shakespeare copy of Macbeth, it should have an 'Introduction' at the start, talking about key themes/motifs, major characters, and also a scene-by-scene summary! ive found going through the scene-by-scene summaries and adding major quotes (if there is any) and highlighting key info in said summaries + annotating them with your own knowledge to be very helpful! hope this helps <3

Reply 63

How many quotes should a memorise for poems for a guaranteed 9, bcus im memorising 9-12 quotes for each poem (around 18 poems i think) and then i see people saying they memorise “4 quotes + structure” for each poem.

Reply 64

Original post
by Blinkr

Welcome to the GCSE English Literature Study Group!
:beard::clip::deal::work:

This thread is a place you can connect with fellow students who are also studying English Literature at GCSE. Here we offer a space to support each other support as you prepare for your exams/coursework.
Feel free to share any helpful tips, resources, or advice you find along the way, and share any questions you have about the subject.
Help encourage others, celebrate your achievements, or simply vent when things get a bit overwhelming!
Lil serious note - just a reminder please be aware that sharing or requesting copyrighted materials is against our community guidelines, and moving conversations off-site for this purpose is not allowed. Posts violating these rules will be taken down.
To get started, here are a few questions to break the ice:

Which exam board are you following?

What do you enjoy the most about this subject or course?

What topics within GCSE English Literature do you find most challenging/interesting?


I follow AQA, enjoy paper 1 question 5 as can just memorize 40/40 question, find inspector calls hard.
What are predictions for power and conflict poem? I'm hearing nature poem like storm on the island
Any predictions for Macbeth, Inspector calls, A Christmas Carol?

Reply 65

Original post
by Quinn47
How many quotes should a memorise for poems for a guaranteed 9, bcus im memorising 9-12 quotes for each poem (around 18 poems i think) and then i see people saying they memorise “4 quotes + structure” for each poem.

4 quotes + structure is better as you can memorise detailed analysis more than doing 9 per poem
Remember you still got the other three texts and unseen to revise
If you do power and conflict most likely nature poem like storm on the island or prelude

Reply 66

Original post
by Drip22
4 quotes + structure is better as you can memorise detailed analysis more than doing 9 per poem
Remember you still got the other three texts and unseen to revise
If you do power and conflict most likely nature poem like storm on the island or prelude

when talking about structure, you mean like rhyming couplets ect?

Reply 67

Original post
by Quinn47
when talking about structure, you mean like rhyming couplets ect?

Yeah, plus enjambment ( the continuation of a sentence at the end of a line, couplet or a stanza) and also the narrative voice (perspective of story - who is talking), anaphora (repetition), juxtaposition, free verse (no rhyme), alliteration, assonance.

Make sure for each you know how this links to the poem, key themes, the quotes ect.

Reply 68

Original post
by Drip22
Yeah, plus enjambment ( the continuation of a sentence at the end of a line, couplet or a stanza) and also the narrative voice (perspective of story - who is talking), anaphora (repetition), juxtaposition, free verse (no rhyme), alliteration, assonance.
Make sure for each you know how this links to the poem, key themes, the quotes ect.

@Quinn47 what are you doing for you English literature (what texts, what poem - power and conflict or love and relationship)

Reply 69

Original post
by laaibah7
does anyone do edexcel english and do they know the section A questions from the 2024 paper
I do edexcel and do you mean the unseen because I did it for my march or jan mocks it was about the life cycle of a flower for 24 gcse lit
Hey everyone! Hope you're feeling ok about next week's exam :hugs:

I just wanted to send over the exam chats for Monday's exams if you're not already in them - hopefully they will be handy to chat about specifics in!

AQA GCSE English Literature Paper 1
OCR GCSE English Literature Paper 1
Edexcel GCSE English Literature Paper 1
WJEC GCSE English Literature Unit 1 (Foundation)
WJEC GCSE English Literature Unit 1 (Higher)

Good luck and we're here if you need us :biggrin:

Tagging in everyone who posted in this thread

Spoiler

Reply 71

This is my paper 1 english literature practice paper. I do Jekyll and hyde and romeo and Juliet and this is the 2018 paper. This paper got a 60/64


1.

Romeo and Juliet 31/34 (4/4 for SPaG and 27/30 for the content)

Shakespeare presents relationships between adults and young people in Romeo and Juliet as initially supportive but ultimately unreliable, as, towards the start of the play, adults seem more understanding and supportive of the lovers, but by the end, the adults had betrayed their trust or failed them, ultimately leading to their tragic deaths.
In the extract, the relationship between Juliet and her father appears to be strained because Juliet refuses to marry Paris. Unknowing to Lord Capulet, Juliet had married Romeo Montague, who was from their rival family. Lord Capulet saw this as complete disobedience, which was almost unheard of in Elizabethan England because children were taught to obey their parents. His disobedience worsened his grief (as he had just lost his nephew, Tybalt) and sparked his anger. This is shown when Lord Capulet insults Juliet, calling her ‘you green-sickness carrion! Out, you baggage! You tallow-face’. The use of tricolon emphasises Lord Capulet’s anger at Juliet for not complying as she was supposed to, while the repetition of ‘you’ emphasises that he is talking to Juliet. His calling her ‘tallow-face’ and a ‘green-sickness carrion’ talks about how pale her complexion is and likens her to rotten flesh, foreshadowing her death later on. It is as if in his anger, he cursed his daughter, which led to the tragedy of her death. However, this is also the only way that Lord Capulet can see to it that Juliet is taken care of when he dies. Especially because Tybalt had just died. If Juliet were left alone to fend for herself, she would die as well because the patriarchal society held women in low regard, ending the Capulet bloodline, which was the nightmare of every high-ranking nobleman. He thought that if he married her off to another man, she would live a comfortable life.

This completely juxtaposes Lord Capulet’s relationship with her in Act 1, Scene 2, where he is reluctant to make Juliet marry Paris at such a young age. This was shown when he said, ‘let two more summers wither in their pride ere we may think her ripe to be a bride’. Here he tells Paris to wait 2 more years so that she is not ‘marred’ because she married ‘too soon’. This shows how caring and concerned Lord Capulet was about his daughter, and while fathers of that time cared about the quality of their daughters as a commodity (or bride), they never cared enough to halt or slow down the sales of their daughters. This distinguishes Lord Capulet from the typical Elizabethan father, painting him in a positive light, which Shakespeare uses to set the stage for his betrayal. The use of the adjective ‘ripe’ compares Juliet to a sweet fruit; however, it also objectifies her, showing that while he cares for her, he still sees her as a commodity that will later be sold off to increase his social status. This shows that the relationship between Juliet and Lord Capulet is mainly contractual.

In the play as a whole, Shakespeare presents the relationship between old and young people as one of genuine love through the relationship between the nurse and Juliet. The nurse is presented as Juliet’s maternal figure who has been taking care of Juliet since she was a ‘babe’. This completely juxtaposes the relationship between Juliet and her mother which is presented as cold and almost non-existent as it wasnt common at the time for mothers to have a close bond with their children because they had only one job which was to produce more children. This contrast is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘I think it best you married with the county…Romeo’s a dishclout to him’ when the nurse was telling Juliet to marry Paris instead of mourning Romeo’s banishment and disobeying her father even though she supported Romeo and Juliet’s relationship. This shows that she is willing to change her alliance if it makes Juliet’s life easier. The nurse’s tone is gentle when she says ‘I think it best you married with the county’ and humorful when she says ‘Romeo’s a dishclout to him’ which suggests that she is trying to let Juliet down nicely. The use of the verb ‘think’ connotes a suggestion which shows that the nurse isn’t forcing her beliefs on Juliet while the use of the superlative adjective ‘best’ suggests that she has Juliet's best interest at heart when she gives her advice. However the nurse’s gentle tone is juxtaposed with Lady Capulet’ curt tone which is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘talk not to me for I’ll not speak’ after Lady Capulet had delivered the message that Juleit was to marry Paris. The use of the phrase ‘I’ll not speak’ suggests that she will not defend Juliet from her father but will leave her to fend for herself out of fear for what Lord Capulet would do to her if she did, painting her as a very selfish mother. This was because women at that time didn’t go against the word of men as it was a very patriarchal society. The use of the phrase ‘talk not’ suggests that Lady Capulet expects juliet to keep quiet and listen to her father Just as she listened to him which was common at the time because daughters were expected to always listen to their fathers.

In the play as a whole, Shakespeare presents the relationship between old and young people, one of guidance through the relationship between Romeo and Juliet and Friar Lawrence. The Friar offers support and gets Romeo and Juliet married in hopes that this will bring peace between the families but he is also part of the reason why they died because he failed to inform Romeo that Juliet want truly dead after she took the poison. The friar’s support for the ‘alliance’ is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘Thy assistant I’ll be ,for this alliance’. The use of the noun ‘assistant’ shows that he is willing to help them while the use of the noun ‘alliance’ suggests that he believes that the families would change from foes to allies and that it will turn the ‘household’s rancour to pure love’. The Elizabethan audience would have been appalled because the Friar who was a holy man was the cause of the death of the lovers because he helped them disobey their parents which was a sin and go against societal norms of the time such as unwavering familial loyalty. However, after Romeo was banished, he was unable to send the letter to Romeo saying that Juliet was not really dead and that it was just a ‘remedy’ to help her prevent her marriage to Paris because of an ‘infectious pestilence’ in ‘Mantua’. The use of the noun ‘remedy’ connotes a cure for an illness which is an irony because instead of providing a cure, he provided a poison. His inability to send the letter to Romeo is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘neglecting it may do much danger’. The use of the noun ‘danger’ foreshadows the death of the ‘star-cross’d lovers’ and shows that he is aware of the consequences of his actions. This shows how Friar's incompetence led to the death of the lovers and how the adults were unreliable to the young people, specifically the lovers.

In conclusion, Shakespeare uses the relationships between Romeo and the Friar and Juliet and the nurse, her mother and her father as initially supportive but ultimately unreliable leading to their tragic demise.




1.

Jekyll and Hyde 29/30

In the novella The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, Stevenson creates tension and mystery through the description and the exploration of the character of Hyde and his questionable relationship with Jekyll.

In the extract, Stevenson creates mystery and tension through the pathetic fallacy of the fog, which represents Hyde. This is evident as the fog directs Mr Utterson to ‘the home of Henry Jekyll’s favourite’, Hyde. This is shown when Stevenson writes, ‘the fog lifted a little and showed him a dingy street’. The ‘fog’ represents secrecy, as it blocks views and creates mystery and tension, as the reader cannot see past what Stevenson wants them to see. He uses the Gothic conventions of mystery and setting to terrify the Victorian reader. The personification of this fog that ‘lifted’ and ‘showed’ Utterson the street makes it appear as if the fog, which represents Mr Hyde, wanted to show him the street where there were ‘ragged children’ and ‘many women…passing out’. This would terrify the Victorian readers who were afraid of the lower class corrupting people with their perceived immorality, such as drinking ‘a morning glass’ or having too much at a ‘gin-palace’, causing you to ‘pass(ing) out’. This emphasises the theme of continuous selective secrecy in the play and mirrors how Dr Jekyll wanted his evil indulgences to be kept secret for the sake of his reputation, while Hyde did them out in the open.

In the introduction of the novel, Stevenson creates a picture of the character Hyde as a foreboding character creating tension and mystery though his description. He describes him as ‘something down-right detestable’ after Hyde had ‘trampled’ in the little girl and Enfield was asked to describe him, which suggests that Hyde has the aura of something sinister. In particular, the use of the adjective ‘detestable’ connotes something evil and immoral, which was opposite of the expectations for a Victorian gentleman. He also uses the noun ‘something’ which suggests that there is no specific thing about Hyde that is immoral but that he just gives off a bad vibe. He also says that Hyde is ‘not easy to describe’, which links to his physical characteristics, suggesting that he looks abnormal, which is why he is evil, which links to Lombroso’s theory of criminality because people were suspicious of others who had certain facial features and often linked those features to criminal activities. Stevenson does this to create both fear and an enigma of the character Hyde, making him seem like someone with questionable morals, setting the stage for him before the narrator, Mr Utterson, has even met him.

In the beginning of the novel Stevenson uses Mr Utterson, who is the embodiment of all the values and characteristics of a Victorian gentleman, to describe Hyde. Mr Utterson, our narrator, meets Mr Hyde and more or less confirms Enfield’s description of him. Stevenson describes him as ‘hardly human’, which suggests that he might be a supernatural being, foreshadowing that he was born from Jekyll’s transcendental science. The use of the alliteration emphasises this and links to Enfield’s description of him as ‘not easy to describe’. Stevenson used the Gothic convention of the supernatural to terrify the Victorian reader. Additionally, he describes him as ‘Satan’s signature upon a face’, which once again links to Enfield’s description of Hyde as ‘down-right detestable’ and suggests that just the sight of him assures you that he is immoral. The use of the alliteration in ‘Satan’s signature’ emphasises that the mark of evil is on him, and like an artist, Satan has signed him, emphasising that he belongs to Satan and that he is like an embodiment of Satan on the earth. This would leave the Victorian reader appalled because strong morality was the ideal for any Victorian gentleman. Stevenson does this to solidify the description of Hyde as a sinister character capable of doing evil things such as murdering Sir Danvers Carew later on in the novella. He also preys on the fears of Victorian readers about corruption to create tension around the character Hyde as well as enigma, leaving the reader both afraid and curious about where he came from and what he is exactly.

Towards the end of the novel, Stevenson creates tension and mystery through the incident at the window where Utterson and Enfield saw what they shouldn’t have seen. This is shown when he writes, ‘they saw it but for a glimpse’. The use of the pronoun ‘it’ is very ambiguous and creates mystery about the thing that they saw at that point in the play while the use of the noun ‘glimpse’ suggests that they didn’t see the whole thing but only a small fraction of it which also creates mystery as at that point in the novel they aren’t completely sure about what they saw. Stevenson uses the Gothic conventions of mystery and suspense to prey of the fears of the Victorian reader and to create suspense. Additionally, Stevenson writes that they had ‘horror in their eyes’ which suggest the severity of the ‘glimpse’ that they say and terrifies the victorian reader by making them anxious about the the full picture of what happened. The use of the adjective ‘horror’ describes the level of fear that the ‘two gentlemen’ felt when they saw what happened, while the use of the noun ‘eyes’ suggests that the fear show is pure as the ‘eyes’ can be seen as the window to one’s soul and true emotions. The severity of their fear is further reinforced by their exclaimations ‘God forgive us!’ which suggests that what they have seen was so evil that they need to repent despite only being a spectator to the event. It could also illustrate how they could only find refuge in ‘God’ because what they was was just so terrifying. It also foreshadows that what they saw was not human but the supernatural outcome of Jekyll’s Transcendental science. Stevenson uses the Gothic conventions of the supernatural and storing emotions to create mystery, fear and tension around the incident at the window.

In conclusion, Stevenson uses settings, events and the character Hyde to create mystery and tension throughout the play.

Should I post my paper 2 as well?

Reply 72

Original post
by Quinn47
How many quotes should a memorise for poems for a guaranteed 9, bcus im memorising 9-12 quotes for each poem (around 18 poems i think) and then i see people saying they memorise “4 quotes + structure” for each poem.

yeah 9-12 quotes is defo alot minimum 3 quotes- one from the top, middle and end

Reply 73

Original post
by StrawberryDreams
Hey everyone! Hope you're feeling ok about next week's exam :hugs:
I just wanted to send over the exam chats for Monday's exams if you're not already in them - hopefully they will be handy to chat about specifics in!
AQA GCSE English Literature Paper 1
OCR GCSE English Literature Paper 1
Edexcel GCSE English Literature Paper 1
WJEC GCSE English Literature Unit 1 (Foundation)
WJEC GCSE English Literature Unit 1 (Higher)
Good luck and we're here if you need us :biggrin:
Tagging in everyone who posted in this thread

Spoiler


Hi! I just joined the website, and wanted to find some info and help leading up to the exams next week. I'm taking AQA English Lang and Lit, and wanted to join the exam chat you just posted, except it's not letting me view the page. Can you tell me what I need to do to join the thread? Thank you!
Original post
by thuo1
Hi! I just joined the website, and wanted to find some info and help leading up to the exams next week. I'm taking AQA English Lang and Lit, and wanted to join the exam chat you just posted, except it's not letting me view the page. Can you tell me what I need to do to join the thread? Thank you!

So sorry about that - it should be working now! Let me know if it's not :smile:

Reply 75

Original post
by whatever4+4isyes
This is my paper 1 english literature practice paper. I do Jekyll and hyde and romeo and Juliet and this is the 2018 paper. This paper got a 60/64

1.

Romeo and Juliet 31/34 (4/4 for SPaG and 27/30 for the content)

Shakespeare presents relationships between adults and young people in Romeo and Juliet as initially supportive but ultimately unreliable, as, towards the start of the play, adults seem more understanding and supportive of the lovers, but by the end, the adults had betrayed their trust or failed them, ultimately leading to their tragic deaths.
In the extract, the relationship between Juliet and her father appears to be strained because Juliet refuses to marry Paris. Unknowing to Lord Capulet, Juliet had married Romeo Montague, who was from their rival family. Lord Capulet saw this as complete disobedience, which was almost unheard of in Elizabethan England because children were taught to obey their parents. His disobedience worsened his grief (as he had just lost his nephew, Tybalt) and sparked his anger. This is shown when Lord Capulet insults Juliet, calling her ‘you green-sickness carrion! Out, you baggage! You tallow-face’. The use of tricolon emphasises Lord Capulet’s anger at Juliet for not complying as she was supposed to, while the repetition of ‘you’ emphasises that he is talking to Juliet. His calling her ‘tallow-face’ and a ‘green-sickness carrion’ talks about how pale her complexion is and likens her to rotten flesh, foreshadowing her death later on. It is as if in his anger, he cursed his daughter, which led to the tragedy of her death. However, this is also the only way that Lord Capulet can see to it that Juliet is taken care of when he dies. Especially because Tybalt had just died. If Juliet were left alone to fend for herself, she would die as well because the patriarchal society held women in low regard, ending the Capulet bloodline, which was the nightmare of every high-ranking nobleman. He thought that if he married her off to another man, she would live a comfortable life.
This completely juxtaposes Lord Capulet’s relationship with her in Act 1, Scene 2, where he is reluctant to make Juliet marry Paris at such a young age. This was shown when he said, ‘let two more summers wither in their pride ere we may think her ripe to be a bride’. Here he tells Paris to wait 2 more years so that she is not ‘marred’ because she married ‘too soon’. This shows how caring and concerned Lord Capulet was about his daughter, and while fathers of that time cared about the quality of their daughters as a commodity (or bride), they never cared enough to halt or slow down the sales of their daughters. This distinguishes Lord Capulet from the typical Elizabethan father, painting him in a positive light, which Shakespeare uses to set the stage for his betrayal. The use of the adjective ‘ripe’ compares Juliet to a sweet fruit; however, it also objectifies her, showing that while he cares for her, he still sees her as a commodity that will later be sold off to increase his social status. This shows that the relationship between Juliet and Lord Capulet is mainly contractual.
In the play as a whole, Shakespeare presents the relationship between old and young people as one of genuine love through the relationship between the nurse and Juliet. The nurse is presented as Juliet’s maternal figure who has been taking care of Juliet since she was a ‘babe’. This completely juxtaposes the relationship between Juliet and her mother which is presented as cold and almost non-existent as it wasnt common at the time for mothers to have a close bond with their children because they had only one job which was to produce more children. This contrast is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘I think it best you married with the county…Romeo’s a dishclout to him’ when the nurse was telling Juliet to marry Paris instead of mourning Romeo’s banishment and disobeying her father even though she supported Romeo and Juliet’s relationship. This shows that she is willing to change her alliance if it makes Juliet’s life easier. The nurse’s tone is gentle when she says ‘I think it best you married with the county’ and humorful when she says ‘Romeo’s a dishclout to him’ which suggests that she is trying to let Juliet down nicely. The use of the verb ‘think’ connotes a suggestion which shows that the nurse isn’t forcing her beliefs on Juliet while the use of the superlative adjective ‘best’ suggests that she has Juliet's best interest at heart when she gives her advice. However the nurse’s gentle tone is juxtaposed with Lady Capulet’ curt tone which is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘talk not to me for I’ll not speak’ after Lady Capulet had delivered the message that Juleit was to marry Paris. The use of the phrase ‘I’ll not speak’ suggests that she will not defend Juliet from her father but will leave her to fend for herself out of fear for what Lord Capulet would do to her if she did, painting her as a very selfish mother. This was because women at that time didn’t go against the word of men as it was a very patriarchal society. The use of the phrase ‘talk not’ suggests that Lady Capulet expects juliet to keep quiet and listen to her father Just as she listened to him which was common at the time because daughters were expected to always listen to their fathers.
In the play as a whole, Shakespeare presents the relationship between old and young people, one of guidance through the relationship between Romeo and Juliet and Friar Lawrence. The Friar offers support and gets Romeo and Juliet married in hopes that this will bring peace between the families but he is also part of the reason why they died because he failed to inform Romeo that Juliet want truly dead after she took the poison. The friar’s support for the ‘alliance’ is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘Thy assistant I’ll be ,for this alliance’. The use of the noun ‘assistant’ shows that he is willing to help them while the use of the noun ‘alliance’ suggests that he believes that the families would change from foes to allies and that it will turn the ‘household’s rancour to pure love’. The Elizabethan audience would have been appalled because the Friar who was a holy man was the cause of the death of the lovers because he helped them disobey their parents which was a sin and go against societal norms of the time such as unwavering familial loyalty. However, after Romeo was banished, he was unable to send the letter to Romeo saying that Juliet was not really dead and that it was just a ‘remedy’ to help her prevent her marriage to Paris because of an ‘infectious pestilence’ in ‘Mantua’. The use of the noun ‘remedy’ connotes a cure for an illness which is an irony because instead of providing a cure, he provided a poison. His inability to send the letter to Romeo is shown when Shakespeare writes ‘neglecting it may do much danger’. The use of the noun ‘danger’ foreshadows the death of the ‘star-cross’d lovers’ and shows that he is aware of the consequences of his actions. This shows how Friar's incompetence led to the death of the lovers and how the adults were unreliable to the young people, specifically the lovers.
In conclusion, Shakespeare uses the relationships between Romeo and the Friar and Juliet and the nurse, her mother and her father as initially supportive but ultimately unreliable leading to their tragic demise.

1.

Jekyll and Hyde 29/30

In the novella The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, Stevenson creates tension and mystery through the description and the exploration of the character of Hyde and his questionable relationship with Jekyll.
In the extract, Stevenson creates mystery and tension through the pathetic fallacy of the fog, which represents Hyde. This is evident as the fog directs Mr Utterson to ‘the home of Henry Jekyll’s favourite’, Hyde. This is shown when Stevenson writes, ‘the fog lifted a little and showed him a dingy street’. The ‘fog’ represents secrecy, as it blocks views and creates mystery and tension, as the reader cannot see past what Stevenson wants them to see. He uses the Gothic conventions of mystery and setting to terrify the Victorian reader. The personification of this fog that ‘lifted’ and ‘showed’ Utterson the street makes it appear as if the fog, which represents Mr Hyde, wanted to show him the street where there were ‘ragged children’ and ‘many women…passing out’. This would terrify the Victorian readers who were afraid of the lower class corrupting people with their perceived immorality, such as drinking ‘a morning glass’ or having too much at a ‘gin-palace’, causing you to ‘pass(ing) out’. This emphasises the theme of continuous selective secrecy in the play and mirrors how Dr Jekyll wanted his evil indulgences to be kept secret for the sake of his reputation, while Hyde did them out in the open.
In the introduction of the novel, Stevenson creates a picture of the character Hyde as a foreboding character creating tension and mystery though his description. He describes him as ‘something down-right detestable’ after Hyde had ‘trampled’ in the little girl and Enfield was asked to describe him, which suggests that Hyde has the aura of something sinister. In particular, the use of the adjective ‘detestable’ connotes something evil and immoral, which was opposite of the expectations for a Victorian gentleman. He also uses the noun ‘something’ which suggests that there is no specific thing about Hyde that is immoral but that he just gives off a bad vibe. He also says that Hyde is ‘not easy to describe’, which links to his physical characteristics, suggesting that he looks abnormal, which is why he is evil, which links to Lombroso’s theory of criminality because people were suspicious of others who had certain facial features and often linked those features to criminal activities. Stevenson does this to create both fear and an enigma of the character Hyde, making him seem like someone with questionable morals, setting the stage for him before the narrator, Mr Utterson, has even met him.
In the beginning of the novel Stevenson uses Mr Utterson, who is the embodiment of all the values and characteristics of a Victorian gentleman, to describe Hyde. Mr Utterson, our narrator, meets Mr Hyde and more or less confirms Enfield’s description of him. Stevenson describes him as ‘hardly human’, which suggests that he might be a supernatural being, foreshadowing that he was born from Jekyll’s transcendental science. The use of the alliteration emphasises this and links to Enfield’s description of him as ‘not easy to describe’. Stevenson used the Gothic convention of the supernatural to terrify the Victorian reader. Additionally, he describes him as ‘Satan’s signature upon a face’, which once again links to Enfield’s description of Hyde as ‘down-right detestable’ and suggests that just the sight of him assures you that he is immoral. The use of the alliteration in ‘Satan’s signature’ emphasises that the mark of evil is on him, and like an artist, Satan has signed him, emphasising that he belongs to Satan and that he is like an embodiment of Satan on the earth. This would leave the Victorian reader appalled because strong morality was the ideal for any Victorian gentleman. Stevenson does this to solidify the description of Hyde as a sinister character capable of doing evil things such as murdering Sir Danvers Carew later on in the novella. He also preys on the fears of Victorian readers about corruption to create tension around the character Hyde as well as enigma, leaving the reader both afraid and curious about where he came from and what he is exactly.
Towards the end of the novel, Stevenson creates tension and mystery through the incident at the window where Utterson and Enfield saw what they shouldn’t have seen. This is shown when he writes, ‘they saw it but for a glimpse’. The use of the pronoun ‘it’ is very ambiguous and creates mystery about the thing that they saw at that point in the play while the use of the noun ‘glimpse’ suggests that they didn’t see the whole thing but only a small fraction of it which also creates mystery as at that point in the novel they aren’t completely sure about what they saw. Stevenson uses the Gothic conventions of mystery and suspense to prey of the fears of the Victorian reader and to create suspense. Additionally, Stevenson writes that they had ‘horror in their eyes’ which suggest the severity of the ‘glimpse’ that they say and terrifies the victorian reader by making them anxious about the the full picture of what happened. The use of the adjective ‘horror’ describes the level of fear that the ‘two gentlemen’ felt when they saw what happened, while the use of the noun ‘eyes’ suggests that the fear show is pure as the ‘eyes’ can be seen as the window to one’s soul and true emotions. The severity of their fear is further reinforced by their exclaimations ‘God forgive us!’ which suggests that what they have seen was so evil that they need to repent despite only being a spectator to the event. It could also illustrate how they could only find refuge in ‘God’ because what they was was just so terrifying. It also foreshadows that what they saw was not human but the supernatural outcome of Jekyll’s Transcendental science. Stevenson uses the Gothic conventions of the supernatural and storing emotions to create mystery, fear and tension around the incident at the window.
In conclusion, Stevenson uses settings, events and the character Hyde to create mystery and tension throughout the play.
Should I post my paper 2 as well?

woah thanks for sharing this- it's really helpful and welldone on the marks! 😯 if you wouldn't mind sharing paper 2 that would be amazing..

Reply 76

hello! I asked this question before and idk if it's a silly question - but for romeo and juliet (aqa) - could I just not revise specifically benvolio and mercutio (and for other characters such as friar and nurse revise in slightly less depth?) - I hope this isn't too confusing but I'm wondering if anyone else is revising them and in how much depth?
(edited 10 months ago)

Reply 77

Guys ik thi sounds stupid but just prelearn essay plans and specific quotes that will fit the question nomatter what . when iv prewrriten my essays its the sane quotes and eplanation just differnt reasons as to why dickens or shakespear has done it i can send a plan if anyone is interested

Reply 78

Original post
by km.h
woah thanks for sharing this- it's really helpful and welldone on the marks! 😯 if you wouldn't mind sharing paper 2 that would be amazing..

TYSM!!!

Here's paper 2 (Inspector calls + Power and conflict + Unseen Poetry)
Overall, I got 84/96

Inspector Calls - This was a question that my teacher predicted, and it was 'How does Priestley present ideas about morality in the play as a whole?'. I got 34/34 (30 marks for content and 4 marks for SPaG)

In the play An Inspector Calls, Priestley presents ideas about morality through the different responses, both contrasting and similar, from each character involved to the death of Eva Smith. He brings in uses the themes of old versus young and capitalism versus socialism, as well as the themes of social class/hierarchy and social responsibility, to explore ideas about morality.

Priestley uses the character of Mr Birling to explore ideas about the morality of older upper-middle-class people. He uses these characters to shed light on the fact that these people often lacked sympathy and were usually self-centred and arrogant, therefore lacking morality. This is shown throughout the play, from the start of the play, when Mr Birling mentioned that he wanted to work towards lower costs and higher prices’. This shows the materialism of the upper class and the greed of capitalism. The use of the noun ‘costs’ refers to the overall cost of running a business, including the cost of paying labourers. This suggests that Mr Birling doesn’t see his labourers as people but as an expense and reduces their value and existence to financial liability even though the factory would be nothing without all its labourers, exposing the materialism and greed of the upper class. Priestley does this to represent how the lower class are the ones being exploited the most; however, they are the most necessary part of society (almost like the backbone) and how the prosperity of the rich is built on the sweat of the poor. The fact that even though the labourers went on strike to show their dissatisfaction, he fired the leaders of the strike rather than just paying them a more humane wage, which caused a domino effect leading to the death of Eva Smith. The juxtaposition of the comparatives ‘lower’ and ‘higher’ emphasises how the suppression of the lower class is necessary for the prosperity of the upper class. After Eva Smith’s suicide was revealed to Mr Birling during the inspector’s interrogation with him, Mr Birling says that he ‘can’t accept any responsibility’, showing his lack of empathy and his arrogance because he believes that his actions couldn’t possibly have affected her since it happened two years before her death. The use of the noun ‘responsibility’ represents Mr Brling’s social duty, which he adamantly insists that he cannot do. This continues to the end of the play when we find out that the inspector isn’t real. Mr Biling says, ‘But the whole thing’s different now,’ showing that he never really cared about Eva Smith but only about the ‘public scandal that would break out if the news comes out. The use of the phrase the whole thing’ to describe a suicide illustrates Mr Birling’s flippant and dismissive attitude about the whole ordeal now that it has been revealed that the inspector was a ‘hoax’. The use of the noun ‘different’ shows Mr Birling’s shift in attitude from wanting to pay ‘thousands’ to one of nonchalance. This shows how the upper-class people of the time were unwilling to change their ways because it worked perfectly for them. Priestley uses his character to show how the greed of the upper class inhibited their morality.

Priestley uses the character of Sheila Birling to explore ideas about the morality of the majority of the younger generation of upper-middle-class people. He uses these characters to shed light on the fact that the younger generation was the only hope that society had and that they would advocate for a change from a mutually exclusive society to a society with more peaceful coexistence (in terms of the different social classes interacting). This is shown when Sheila readily accepts responsibility and shows genuine remorse when she says, ‘I will never, never do this again to anybody’. The use of repetition on the adverb ‘never’ shows her adamance in the belief that she has done something wrong and that she will work towards never doing anything like that ever again. The use of the pronoun ‘anybody’ shows that her guilt and repentance extend further than remorse for what she did to Eva Smith. The gruesome act has changed her perspective of things and left an ‘impression on her’, so she will try to implement her new attitude into her everyday life. Priestley does this to show that the younger generation are able to change (for example, the suffragette movement for women) and lead the society to change as well, making everyone and not just the upper class prosper. The fact that Sheila, a woman, was the first to accept blame was deliberate of Priestley’s part and shows how even though women at the time were depicted as emotional, their ‘hysterical’ nature was often the driving force for this change. Sheila continues to accept responsibility throughout the play. This is shown when she says, ‘I had her turned out of another’. The verb phrase ‘turned out’ shows that she acknowledges that she used her status for something wrong, and her tone shows regret and remorse for her actions. The use of the noun ‘another’ suggests that Sheila accepts her part in Eva Smith’s demise which links to the theme of social responsibility, as she evenly distributes the guilt amongst the five of them when she recounts what led to the death of Eva Smith. Priestley does this to show that the younger generation are more emotionally intelligent, which allows them to relate better with the lower-class people. He lets us know that this can lead to a change in society from a conservative and traditional capitalist and selfish society to a more socialist and morally sound society.

In conclusion, Priestley effectively uses the characters of Sheila and Mr Birling to show the different perspectives and contrasting attitudes and views of morality between old and young people in the upper class by showing their different reactions, concerns and takeaways from the suicide of Eva Smith.


1.

Power and conflict. I'm not sure what the question was. I think it was about the effects of conflict on individuals or something. The poem given was Remains and I compared it to The Emigree. I got 27/30, which is amazing because I'm horrible at poetry. I only got like 21 in my mocks.

In the poem Remains, the poet presents a personal experience of conflict from the perspective of soldiers by accurately depicting what soldiers have to go through both during the time of conflict and what continues to haunt their minds after the conflict. He exposes the PTSD that most, if not all, soldiers have as an adverse effect of conflict. On the other hand, the poem The Emigree explores the personal experience of conflict from the perspective of citizens by shedding light on the experiences of people who were forced out of their country as a result of conflict, whether internal or external, and as a result became refugees in other countries. She talks about how even though people only see the bad side of their countries, they can only see the good side.

Both poets use analepsis to show the power of memory both before and after conflict and the different effects that this power has on the different classes or types of people who face conflict. In Remains, the personal experience of conflict comes from the soldier’s personal experience of the negative side effects of war on mental health. Armitage shows this when he writes, ‘he’s here in my head’. The use of the noun ‘head’ really emphasises the psychological impact that war can have on soldiers. It shows that the memory of ‘see(ing) every round as it rips through his life’ is haunting him, and not because the soldier was ‘possibly armed’ but because he was ‘probably not’. This was possibly why the phrase ‘probably armed, possibly not’ is repeated in the poem, because the possibility of the soldier killing an innocent man was what really triggered his trauma and guilt. The use of the analepsis in ‘blink… sleep…dream’ really emphasises the timeless loop of PTSD and how this event follows the soldier subconsciously to the point where he cannot complete normal bodily functions without thinking of what happened. These verbs also link to resting, particularly ‘sleep’ and ‘dream’, suggesting that the soldier is unable to have a break from these events as they keep looping in his brain. This eventually caused him to use ‘drink’ and ‘drugs’ as a coping mechanism, which unfortunately didn’t ‘flush it out’. Armitage does this to show the sad reality of soldiers who have come back from war who may seem healthy physically but are struggling seriously mentally. He uses it to raise awareness about mental health conditions such as PTSD that soldiers struggle with heavily after witnessing the gruesome happenings at war.

In the poem The Emigree, the personal experience of conflict comes from an immigrant’s memories about her home country which was experiencing conflict. Rumens shows this when she writes, ‘I am branded by an impression of sunlight’. The use of the verb ‘branded’ links to the idea that this country is part of her identity and that it will always be obvious that she is not from the country that she currently resides in. Though the verb is very violent and harsh, the writer uses it to show how deep her love and patriotism for her country go. Rumens also writes that the country is ‘sick with tyrants’ but that the ‘worst news I (she) receive of it cannot break my (her) original view’, suggesting that even though the country may be experiencing self-inflicted internal conflict, she can only remember her good childhood memories. The use of the verb ‘sick’ suggests that the ‘tyrants’ are a plague that will eventually pass and that her country will become good again. The use of the comparative ‘worst’ really emphasises the extent of denial that she is experiencing whenever she tries to think about the good times in her country. Additionally, she constantly refers to ‘sunlight’ when speaking about her country, which could suggest that she is being blinded by her past memories and that thinking of her memories is her coping mechanism to deal with the fact that her home country is run by ‘tyrants’. This really represents the hope that immigrants feel for their country to return to its former glory. Rumens does this to show the thoughts of people who are refugees in different countries as a result of countries. She shows that even though the citizens of the new country don’t think highly of their countries, the citizens of the warring countries do, and their patriotism is very deep-rooted even though other people from other countries don’t understand why.

The poem Remains is written as a monologue because it was used to spread awareness about PTSD after Armitage interviewed soldiers from the Iraq war. It was very deliberate, as he used it to convey a sense of analepsis to help the audience try to understand how PTSD for soldiers was and how it attacked them, showing that the conflict was not the only thing that many of them battled. Armitage also uses. He also uses free verse and enjambment to imitate natural speech in his storytelling. The enjambment specifically is used to quicken the pace particularly when talking about how ‘i (he) swear(s) / I (he) see(s) every round as he rips through his life’ and when ‘one of (my) his mates goes by/ and tosses his guts back into his body’, showing how quickly it all happened for the soldier. However, the poem The Emigree is written in first person to convey how personal and sensitive the topic is, especially for immigrants, both illegal and legal. Similar to Remains, The Emigree uses enjambment and free verse to imitate the freedom that the immigrant feels through the memory of her country and represents how she uses her freedom of speech to say good things about her country in a place where they only believe bad things about her country, which juxtaposes the fact that she was censored in the new country, as her country’s ‘vocabulary’ is now ‘a lie, banned by the state’.

In conclusion, both Rumens and Armitage present ideas about personal experiences of conflict through the use of the power of memory. Artimage conveys it from the perspective of a soldier whose personal experience of conflict gave him PTSD and led him to substance abuse, while Rumen conveys it from the perspective of an immigrant whose personal experience of conflict pushed them away from their country to the point where the only part of their country that they can carry around legally is their memory of their country.


1.

Unseen poetry 24 marker. This was a past paper question but I'm not sure which one. I got 18/24

Barber criticises the modern lifestyle because no line is drawn between living life and working a job. She sees that this is the life of most, if not all, working adults. She notices the negative effects of individuality that this has on us and encourages us to take time to enjoy the beauty of nature and distract ourselves from the ever-demanding lifestyle that we all seem to live.

She presents the idea that the way we live in the modern world is a global experience that affects our individuality because everyone is living the same life. This is evident throughout the poem because she constantly uses plural nouns like ‘e-mails’, ‘deadlines’, ‘faxes’, and ‘phones’. It mirrors the repetitive and constant demands that we have to fulfil in our modern lifestyle. This creates a sense of accumulation of work and the overwhelming effect that it can have on everyone in society. It also makes the suffering seem more universal, like it applies to everyone in the world, like the poet isn’t talking to someone specifically but to an audience. It captures the shared societal pressure. Additionally, the title of the poem ‘How to Leave a World That Worships Should’ suggests that everyone idolises this modern lifestyle. The title is structured in the format of a manual that is trying to encourage individuality. The hyperbolic verb ‘worships’ emphasises the intensity of the modern lifestyle and the blind devotion-turned-culture that people have for it. While the use of the modal verb ‘should’ represents the expectations that society places on us, such as the ‘deadlines’, the ‘e-mails’ and the ‘faxes’. The use of the metaphoric noun ‘world’ provides a sense of collectiveness and represents everyone in the society ’that worships should’. The poet does this to highlight that the majority of society loves the same life and to try to deter society from continuing to live a collective lifestyle and bring back individuality.

Additionally, she criticises that the modern lifestyle has no distinction between work and enjoying life by slowing down the business that is adulthood and enjoying life. She does this through the juxtaposition of the semantic fields of the feeling of serenity, simplicity and freedom that nature brings and the suffocating nature of sedentary jobs. The semantic field of sedentary jobs is shown when she writes ‘faxes’, ‘deadlines’, ‘emails’, ‘phones’ and ‘junkmail’. The use of plural illustrates the never-ending nature of this lifestyle. These nouns create a sense of clutter, noise and pressure that distracts and prevents the adults of society from actually enjoying life. It shows how we as a society are trapped under our overwhelming lifestyle, and Barber tries to tell us as a society to break free from the shackles that keep us from enjoying ourselves. This is shown when she writes, ‘Let phones, unanswered, ring themselves to sleep’. The use of the imperative ‘let’ suggests that we should allow the phones to do what they usually do (‘ring’) without interrupting them. It gives the reader permission to stop chasing responsibilities. The phrase ‘ring themselves to sleep’ personifies the phones, suggesting that phones are like restless children and they will stop disturbing us without us intervening. This tells us that phones, like our jobs, aren’t supposed to dictate our lives. The semantic field of nature is shown when she writes ‘breathe’, 'air’, ‘waves’, ‘beach’ and ‘sky’. These nouns evoke peace and bring a sense of freedom, which completely juxtaposes the restraining modern lifestyle. The use of singular nouns emphasises the simplicity of nature, which completely juxtaposes the complexity of everyday jobs. Nature represents the escape from societal expectations that the poet thinks we all need. She does this to embolden the line between work and living life.

Finally, the poem is written in the sonnet form so that it looks visually controlled; however, it lacks a set rhyme scheme. This subversion emphasises the writer’s intention of the poem, which was to reject the rigidity of societal expectations and embrace nature while recognising its influence. The writer uses caesura to reflect the mental breakdown that overworking can lead to, while the use of enjambment represents the freedom that nature can give. The enjambment could also reflect the emotional overflow from the stress of having to meet deadlines, while the caesura breaks up the overwhelming pace caused by the modern-day lifestyle, mirroring the writer’s suggestion of us stopping from time to time to admire the simplicity of nature.

In conclusion, the poet presents the idea that the modern-day lifestyle is very detrimental to us as a society, as it is overwhelming, and because everyone is going through it, it affects our individuality, as nobody has a unique experience. She suggests that to remedy the detriment caused by it that we stop and admire nature from time to time.

1.

Unseen poetry 8 marker. I got 5/8, which was probably because I only wrote 1 paragraph, so if you want more marks, you should probably write more, but I'm honestly horrendous at timing.

In both poems, the poets use semantic fields to describe the world around us. In the poem How to Leave the World That Worships Should’ the poet uses the semantic field of work, including nouns such as ‘deadlines’ and ‘e-mails’, to describe how humans let the world around us be controlled by our work and the rigid structure that humans have to follow due to the societal norm of meeting and exceding expectations rather than lacking. He does this to criticise how we let our lives be dictated by what we created. He shows us how hectic and overwhelming the world around us is. On the other hand, in the poem ‘The Rich Eat Three Full Meals’, the poet uses the semantic field of serenity, including nouns like ‘peace’ and ‘rest’, to illustrate how calm and refreshing the world around us is when you appreciate nature. He does this to show the importance of nature in the world around us. He shows us how calm and enjoyable the world around us is.

Reply 79

Original post
by Custards Creme
Guys ik thi sounds stupid but just prelearn essay plans and specific quotes that will fit the question nomatter what . when iv prewrriten my essays its the sane quotes and eplanation just differnt reasons as to why dickens or shakespear has done it i can send a plan if anyone is interested

im interesteddd - i started prelearning essays but then gave up cuz i forgot it the next day - i do acc and macbeth

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.