Oxford University applicants fall out rate

Can I please ask what you mean by “fall out rate” as, to me, this implies the candidates/applicants are themselves withdrawing from the application process rather than being ‘deselected’ or their application ‘going no further’.

Is there some issue with this sub-forum? People seem to use quite an abrasive tone. The issue arises due to the fact that candidates are refrained from applying to both Cambridge and Oxford at the same time. And I am trying to understand a few bits here, starting from the high fall out rate to the delta between the finals. If you are absolutely clear about the rationale, good for you. I may still probe until I get a satisfactory view.

Why don't you just come clean and explain your beef? Your question has been answered more than once. You appear not to like the answers, but they won't change to make you happy.
Finance bro terminology doesn't apply to the selection of undergraduates.

The university’s processes aim to filter down the applicants to around 3 applicants per place for interview. If it is a subject where there are only about 4 applicants per place, therefore most of them will get an interview. If it is a subject where there are around 10 applicants per place, most of them won’t.
After this, logically, only around 1 in 3 applicants who are interviewed will be successful. So you are right that about 2/3 of the interviewed don’t get a place - this is how the system is designed.
The colleges can’t just create more places because there are good applicants. Every year there are more good applicants than there are places available - the entire purpose of the exercise is to work out who the very strongest are.