The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40

Original post
by Anonymous
I'm happy with my university and I'm happy with the course I'm doing.
It really doesn't concern you unless you are on the course and from the questions you are asking I can assume you are not. You can wait until the leng review is published and read it yourself to see what the future of PAs will hold instead of coming out with arbitrary statements based on speculation of what the outcome of the review will be. You have no direct input into the future of the role or the leng review itself.

Good so you are happy. You can't say that you haven't been warned.

Reply 41

The course I am on is a 4 year integrated Masters course, I, like anyone else going to university in this day and age did my research before applying.

Yes THEY DO TEACH TO THE MEDICAL MODEL. I do the first 2 years of medical school (so we have the SAME pre clinical years as medical students) and then join with the 2 year Msc PA students for my 3rd and 4th year, whilst the medical students go on to do their clinical years 3-5)

In the FIRST 2 YEARS (preclinical years for med students):

I sit NEXT to medical students in the SAME lecture hall

we have the same lecturers

We have the same content to study for exams

We sit the SAME exams in the same exam hall

We sit the same OSCEs and learn the same clinical skills

I and no other student on the course or thinking of doing the course don't need to explain to you why I chose to do it when you're so against it and haven't even done it yourself. You haven't worked with PAs yourself and can't say what the scope of practice will be, yes it is up to the supervisor but people also forget that a PA is a person and has a voice and can say no to doing something that is not within their competency. THE GMC IS REGULATING PAs that has already passed they are the regulating body for PAs, AAs amd Drs that is a fact you can't say they aren't.


I spoke on a panel myself as a student when the GMC came to visit the university when they were preparing for regulation and the outcome just shows that they are happy with the course and the PA profession as they decided to regulate them. Like I said everything doesn't get fixed overnight, yes PAs have been used in the past to cover jobs that aren't within their competencies and this is why regulation came into place. To help standardise this.

Courses that don't meet the requirements will obviously be given guidance on what they should change to meet these. Just like any medical school has to produce a 5 year cohort to become GMC accredited. If a medical school didn't meet these criteria you think they would just stop their medicine course? Of course not. You seem to just make assumptions instead of educating yourself on the actual process of how things work in these institutions. Those universities have stopped intake for the current academic year, they haven't stopped the course altogether and some of these universities are new to providing the course. My university has no intention of stopping the course. if they knew something that would imply that the future of PAs would be negative then they would've stopped it. But they haven't. Those universities that have put a pause on their intake are waiting for the review to be published as ,of course, you can't know anything else about the future of PAs without the outcome of the review. There are still plenty of courses that are well established and have produced many cohorts of practicing PAs that are still running the course. Also anyone who graduates the course can't just get a job they have to pass the PA national exam - the PARA just like medical students have to pass the MLA.

Warned me about what?😂 I currently work part time whilst doing the degree as a Band 3. PAs won't be Band 3/4 they'd be too overqualified. They don't even accept those with a BSc for my job as they are overqualified so why would you think that someone holding a Master's qualification would be a band 3. A band 3 is entry level. In the NHS the starting salary for those with a BSc is band 5. Like in any profession it is up to the newly graduate to have built up a portfolio which will make them stand out and to make connections when applying to competitive jobs. Those who have newly graduated from my course made connections on placement and were offered jobs there and then so obviously there are opportunities there that aren't publicly advertised on NHS job websites. No one would want to be a PA or a Dr for the money that is a ridiculous thing to say, especially in the UK 😂 healthcare professionals are going abroad to get paid more. And no it's not just a vocational course, like with a medicine degree not everyone who has one becomes a doctor. You're not doing the course and you're not a PA so you need to stop spreading false information.

Reply 42

Original post
by Anonymous
The course I am on is a 4 year integrated Masters course, I, like anyone else going to university in this day and age did my research before applying.
Yes THEY DO TEACH TO THE MEDICAL MODEL. I do the first 2 years of medical school (so we have the SAME pre clinical years as medical students) and then join with the 2 year Msc PA students for my 3rd and 4th year, whilst the medical students go on to do their clinical years 3-5)
In the FIRST 2 YEARS (preclinical years for med students):

I sit NEXT to medical students in the SAME lecture hall

we have the same lecturers

We have the same content to study for exams

We sit the SAME exams in the same exam hall

We sit the same OSCEs and learn the same clinical skills
I and no other student on the course or thinking of doing the course don't need to explain to you why I chose to do it when you're so against it and haven't even done it yourself. You haven't worked with PAs yourself and can't say what the scope of practice will be, yes it is up to the supervisor but people also forget that a PA is a person and has a voice and can say no to doing something that is not within their competency. THE GMC IS REGULATING PAs that has already passed they are the regulating body for PAs, AAs amd Drs that is a fact you can't say they aren't.


I spoke on a panel myself as a student when the GMC came to visit the university when they were preparing for regulation and the outcome just shows that they are happy with the course and the PA profession as they decided to regulate them. Like I said everything doesn't get fixed overnight, yes PAs have been used in the past to cover jobs that aren't within their competencies and this is why regulation came into place. To help standardise this.
Courses that don't meet the requirements will obviously be given guidance on what they should change to meet these. Just like any medical school has to produce a 5 year cohort to become GMC accredited. If a medical school didn't meet these criteria you think they would just stop their medicine course? Of course not. You seem to just make assumptions instead of educating yourself on the actual process of how things work in these institutions. Those universities have stopped intake for the current academic year, they haven't stopped the course altogether and some of these universities are new to providing the course. My university has no intention of stopping the course. if they knew something that would imply that the future of PAs would be negative then they would've stopped it. But they haven't. Those universities that have put a pause on their intake are waiting for the review to be published as ,of course, you can't know anything else about the future of PAs without the outcome of the review. There are still plenty of courses that are well established and have produced many cohorts of practicing PAs that are still running the course. Also anyone who graduates the course can't just get a job they have to pass the PA national exam - the PARA just like medical students have to pass the MLA.
Warned me about what?😂 I currently work part time whilst doing the degree as a Band 3. PAs won't be Band 3/4 they'd be too overqualified. They don't even accept those with a BSc for my job as they are overqualified so why would you think that someone holding a Master's qualification would be a band 3. A band 3 is entry level. In the NHS the starting salary for those with a BSc is band 5. Like in any profession it is up to the newly graduate to have built up a portfolio which will make them stand out and to make connections when applying to competitive jobs. Those who have newly graduated from my course made connections on placement and were offered jobs there and then so obviously there are opportunities there that aren't publicly advertised on NHS job websites. No one would want to be a PA or a Dr for the money that is a ridiculous thing to say, especially in the UK 😂 healthcare professionals are going abroad to get paid more. And no it's not just a vocational course, like with a medicine degree not everyone who has one becomes a doctor. You're not doing the course and you're not a PA so you need to stop spreading false information.

You don't know what the medical model means in terms of PAs so you can't have done much research. It isn't anything to do with medicine or teaching medicine. Find out what the US PAs used it to describe. I has been adopted from them.

When you did your research into a vocational course that only leads to one job did you also do any research into how many jobs were being advertised. Can I suggest that you do that research now while you still have time to transfer to a course that will improve your employment prospects?

There are currently a lot of unemployed PAs. They are unemployed because the numbers of jobs has reduced and because the universities have been running courses with more people studying on them than there are jobs for them. That wouldn't matter if the course was not a vocational course leading to only one job but PA studies is a vocational course leading to only one job so if you can't get that job the qualifications are worthless. However you already know this because you researched this course before you started it?

Reply 43

Original post
by Flamingo10
You don't know what the medical model means in terms of PAs so you can't have done much research. It isn't anything to do with medicine or teaching medicine. Find out what the US PAs used it to describe. I has been adopted from them.
When you did your research into a vocational course that only leads to one job did you also do any research into how many jobs were being advertised. Can I suggest that you do that research now while you still have time to transfer to a course that will improve your employment prospects?
There are currently a lot of unemployed PAs. They are unemployed because the numbers of jobs has reduced and because the universities have been running courses with more people studying on them than there are jobs for them. That wouldn't matter if the course was not a vocational course leading to only one job but PA studies is a vocational course leading to only one job so if you can't get that job the qualifications are worthless. However you already know this because you researched this course before you started it?

Yes it is to do with the training the university provides - which is the teaching of the medicine content 🤦🏽*♀️

Physician associates train using the medical model, similar to doctors but with a shorter and more focused curriculum, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the DISEASE that the patient has. So that they are able to diagnose, treat, and manage patients under the supervision of a physician.

Nurses train on the nursing model, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the PATIENT with the disease.

Why would anyone who decided to do the course want to transfer? It may surprise you but we actually want to become physician associates 😯 who would've thought?

So would you say the same thing to those studying medicine or nursing, to drop out or transfer, because many of them are struggling to get jobs too?

Yes I'm happy with the research I have done and I know there are job opportunities in my local area 👍🏻😊 sounds like you're the one who's unhappy.

Reply 44

Original post
by Anonymous
Yes it is to do with the training the university provides - which is the teaching of the medicine content 🤦🏽*♀️
Physician associates train using the medical model, similar to doctors but with a shorter and more focused curriculum, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the DISEASE that the patient has. So that they are able to diagnose, treat, and manage patients under the supervision of a physician.
Nurses train on the nursing model, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the PATIENT with the disease.
Why would anyone who decided to do the course want to transfer? It may surprise you but we actually want to become physician associates 😯 who would've thought?
So would you say the same thing to those studying medicine or nursing, to drop out or transfer, because many of them are struggling to get jobs too?
Yes I'm happy with the research I have done and I know there are job opportunities in my local area 👍🏻😊 sounds like you're the one who's unhappy.


I’ve seen that person on EVERY PA post, don’t bother with them. You’ve got this!

Reply 45

Original post
by Anonymous
Yes it is to do with the training the university provides - which is the teaching of the medicine content 🤦🏽*♀️
Physician associates train using the medical model, similar to doctors but with a shorter and more focused curriculum, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the DISEASE that the patient has. So that they are able to diagnose, treat, and manage patients under the supervision of a physician.
Nurses train on the nursing model, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the PATIENT with the disease.
Why would anyone who decided to do the course want to transfer? It may surprise you but we actually want to become physician associates 😯 who would've thought?
So would you say the same thing to those studying medicine or nursing, to drop out or transfer, because many of them are struggling to get jobs too?
Yes I'm happy with the research I have done and I know there are job opportunities in my local area 👍🏻😊 sounds like you're the one who's unhappy.

Medical Model is nothing to do with medicine that is why I suggested that you researched it. It isn't to do with the teaching of medicine either. It was first used by PAs in the US so you need to look at what they used it to describe. You really should know this as it is fundamental to understanding the contents of your course.

PA studies is not a shortened more intense medical course. Whoever told you that probably did because they haven't studied medicine and so don't know what is on the medicine course.

You cannot learn in 2 years what it takes a doctor 5 years to learn. Again this information has come from someone who hasn't studied medicine.

One of the reasons why the PA role is so dangerous to patients is that many people working in it think that they are as good as doctors when in actual fact the PA qualification is not just much easier than medicine it is also too short for anyone to work safely in the role as it currently is. They could work safely if they were employed much like doctors assistants.

Anyway as people have said before your supervisors will decide on the scope of practice that they are prepared to supervise.
(edited 6 months ago)

Reply 46

Doctors don't train in the medical model. Apart from the fact that this has nothing to do with medicine, doctors study medicine. PAs do not. PAs are not medically trained.

Why would anyone employ a PA to diagnose a patient under supervision when a doctor can do it without supervision? If you employ a PA to do it under supervision you are employing two people to do one job. It is safer and more economical just to employ the doctor. Just employing the doctor also improves patient flow because they don't have to see the patient again after the PA for the sake of patient safety.

Anyone studying the PA course should already have understood what supervision means. PA is a dependent role. The job entirely depends on doctors. Those doctors will decide what they are happy to supervise. I hope that your course includes information on being supervised by a doctor.

Reply 47

Hi. I am a current MPAS Year 3 student on the PA course at Uclan. I joined the 4-year program with the hope that I would become a PA at the end of graduation. Uclan has deceived students, and the people on here defending them, are why they are getting away with it. The students at the UCLan pa course seem to like getting treated as second class. Whilst many other universities have paused their course as the future is unpredictable and they do not want to waste time and money from students, UCLAN has one of the biggest cohorts in the UK, with over 50-60 students per year group. They are not stopping the course because they are not legally obliged to... it pays the PA staff wages... so why would they pause it if they don't need to? Without our fees, they won't have an active income as there are no PA jobs rn, especially considering only one PA works as a PA, while the rest just teach and we have one who just joined the program around 2 months ago despite being a PA in a hospital for 7+ years and 'leaving' that role to teach only...?

I think the students on this thread need to wake up to reality and stop bootlicking uclan and the PA staff team considering they do the minimum which is what other PA courses do... teaching content. Yes, they have taught us medical knowledge and skills, nobody has denied that... but at the same time, they have thrown us in the deep end SIGNIFICANTLY, lying to us about the PA course for so long, giving us false hope, until recently where they suggested many of us to join the Aldo graduate scheme. They have shoved us onto placements, so far away for many of us students (almost near Scotland), lying to us and telling us that we get preferences, which never happened. Whenever there is an issue on the course and you need support, it is not given to you as you would expect and this is for both university and especially placement! While the UCLan medical course invests a lot in its students and pays for bedside teaching, the PA course chooses to keep the money instead and when we go on placement, there is little to do. We are like shadows... we can't do what nursing students do or many of the things medical students can do. PAs themselves, can't do anything such as examinations etc, and on the few occasions they do, it's pointless because the doctors always go and second check and review everything effectively.. so I don't see where we stand.

With no jobs and no scope for PAs, there is no future at the moment. Whilst on placement, I spoke to WORKING, QUALIFIED PAs and doctors within hospitals and a GP surgery where I have done my placements so far, have all advised me to leave the course and join another healthcare degree such as medicine, nursing, or paramedic. They all expressed their concerns about how many PAs they know personally have been made redundant in hospitals and GPs and that it is very unlikely that newly graduating PAs will be getting jobs for the foreseeable future. PAs have little to no role in the hospital, and whilst the doctor does all the work, the only thing a PA might do apart from the odd blood taking, cannulas, or catheters, is just type up for the doctor on ward rounds...

Yes, it's correct, many health professions are lacking jobs, but with PAs, it is much deeper. It isn't because there just are not enough roles... its because the role is very controversial and I agree. By the end of this year, I will be taking my clinical science degree we get and joining another healthcare course, which is more respected and with more job stability once i graduate from there.

Reply 48

Original post
by Anonymous
The course I am on is a 4 year integrated Masters course, I, like anyone else going to university in this day and age did my research before applying.
Yes THEY DO TEACH TO THE MEDICAL MODEL. I do the first 2 years of medical school (so we have the SAME pre clinical years as medical students) and then join with the 2 year Msc PA students for my 3rd and 4th year, whilst the medical students go on to do their clinical years 3-5)
In the FIRST 2 YEARS (preclinical years for med students):

I sit NEXT to medical students in the SAME lecture hall

we have the same lecturers

We have the same content to study for exams

We sit the SAME exams in the same exam hall

We sit the same OSCEs and learn the same clinical skills
I and no other student on the course or thinking of doing the course don't need to explain to you why I chose to do it when you're so against it and haven't even done it yourself. You haven't worked with PAs yourself and can't say what the scope of practice will be, yes it is up to the supervisor but people also forget that a PA is a person and has a voice and can say no to doing something that is not within their competency. THE GMC IS REGULATING PAs that has already passed they are the regulating body for PAs, AAs amd Drs that is a fact you can't say they aren't.


I spoke on a panel myself as a student when the GMC came to visit the university when they were preparing for regulation and the outcome just shows that they are happy with the course and the PA profession as they decided to regulate them. Like I said everything doesn't get fixed overnight, yes PAs have been used in the past to cover jobs that aren't within their competencies and this is why regulation came into place. To help standardise this.
Courses that don't meet the requirements will obviously be given guidance on what they should change to meet these. Just like any medical school has to produce a 5 year cohort to become GMC accredited. If a medical school didn't meet these criteria you think they would just stop their medicine course? Of course not. You seem to just make assumptions instead of educating yourself on the actual process of how things work in these institutions. Those universities have stopped intake for the current academic year, they haven't stopped the course altogether and some of these universities are new to providing the course. My university has no intention of stopping the course. if they knew something that would imply that the future of PAs would be negative then they would've stopped it. But they haven't. Those universities that have put a pause on their intake are waiting for the review to be published as ,of course, you can't know anything else about the future of PAs without the outcome of the review. There are still plenty of courses that are well established and have produced many cohorts of practicing PAs that are still running the course. Also anyone who graduates the course can't just get a job they have to pass the PA national exam - the PARA just like medical students have to pass the MLA.
Warned me about what?😂 I currently work part time whilst doing the degree as a Band 3. PAs won't be Band 3/4 they'd be too overqualified. They don't even accept those with a BSc for my job as they are overqualified so why would you think that someone holding a Master's qualification would be a band 3. A band 3 is entry level. In the NHS the starting salary for those with a BSc is band 5. Like in any profession it is up to the newly graduate to have built up a portfolio which will make them stand out and to make connections when applying to competitive jobs. Those who have newly graduated from my course made connections on placement and were offered jobs there and then so obviously there are opportunities there that aren't publicly advertised on NHS job websites. No one would want to be a PA or a Dr for the money that is a ridiculous thing to say, especially in the UK 😂 healthcare professionals are going abroad to get paid more. And no it's not just a vocational course, like with a medicine degree not everyone who has one becomes a doctor. You're not doing the course and you're not a PA so you need to stop spreading false information.

You did your research 4+ years ago 🤣. Grow up. I did mine last year and was happy. Now, within a year of being on the course, everything has changed about the prospect of the role lmao. Its not looking good

Reply 49

Original post
by Anonymous
You did your research 4+ years ago 🤣. Grow up. I did mine last year and was happy. Now, within a year of being on the course, everything has changed about the prospect of the role lmao. Its not looking good

The university accepted you onto one of its masters courses so it should be possible for you to transfer to a different masters at the same university with much better prospects for a job.

Reply 50

Original post
by Anonymous
Yes it is to do with the training the university provides - which is the teaching of the medicine content 🤦🏽*♀️
Physician associates train using the medical model, similar to doctors but with a shorter and more focused curriculum, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the DISEASE that the patient has. So that they are able to diagnose, treat, and manage patients under the supervision of a physician.
Nurses train on the nursing model, which means they focus on the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of the PATIENT with the disease.
Why would anyone who decided to do the course want to transfer? It may surprise you but we actually want to become physician associates 😯 who would've thought?
So would you say the same thing to those studying medicine or nursing, to drop out or transfer, because many of them are struggling to get jobs too?
Yes I'm happy with the research I have done and I know there are job opportunities in my local area 👍🏻😊 sounds like you're the one who's unhappy.

Do you know that doctors do not have a clue what the "Medical Model" is? After a lot of research someone found out that it had been taken from a method of teaching in the US by PAs in the US to describe their non medical PA course. It was then imported to describe the non medical teaching of the PA course in the UK. "Medical Model" is nothing to do with medicine or learning medicine. The nearest definition of it is as a method of teaching a course that is nothing to do with medicine.

The problem with repeating something like the "medical model" without fully understanding the origins of it or what it means is why so many PAs think that they are learning medicine. If they understood the origins of the Medical Model they would understand that it means that they are NOT being taught medicine.

The only people who are being taught medicine are the medical students who will become doctors.

If someone wants to study medicine then they need to do a medicine course to become a doctor.

Reply 51

Original post
by an0nstud3nt321
Honestly, there’s no point engaging with these people. I tried defending the profession, but the same few accounts just kept repeating the same arguments over and over. We’re not going to get through to them and we don’t even need to. All they do is sit behind a screen attacking PAs instead of letting people make their own informed decisions.

GP's are worried about hiring PAs due to concerns about insurance and indemnity, especially regarding supervision and delegation. GPs are ultimately responsible for the actions of PAs they supervise, including delegation of tasks.While NHS Resolution provides indemnity for clinical negligence, it may not cover all aspects of PA supervision, such as non-clinical advice or regulatory matters. Some GPs may need to seek additional insurance or medical defence organization (MDO) cover to fully protect themselves against potential legal risks. There's a potential risk of legal action against GPs if a PA makes a mistake or causes harm to a patient.Some insurance companies may not offer comprehensive coverage for supervising PAs, or may increase premiums to reflect the added risk. The lack of clarity regarding the role of PAs and the extent of GP supervision may lead to uncertainty about insurance coverage, causing some GPs to be reluctant to hire them

Reply 52

Original post
by jobojobojoboxxx
GP's are worried about hiring PAs due to concerns about insurance and indemnity, especially regarding supervision and delegation. GPs are ultimately responsible for the actions of PAs they supervise, including delegation of tasks.While NHS Resolution provides indemnity for clinical negligence, it may not cover all aspects of PA supervision, such as non-clinical advice or regulatory matters. Some GPs may need to seek additional insurance or medical defence organization (MDO) cover to fully protect themselves against potential legal risks. There's a potential risk of legal action against GPs if a PA makes a mistake or causes harm to a patient.Some insurance companies may not offer comprehensive coverage for supervising PAs, or may increase premiums to reflect the added risk. The lack of clarity regarding the role of PAs and the extent of GP supervision may lead to uncertainty about insurance coverage, causing some GPs to be reluctant to hire them

Doctors in hospitals have the same problem. The supervising doctor takes the blame if a PA makes a mistake and when you look at the attitude or some of the replies on this thread you can see that there are people who think that the PA course is helpful. In reality the only way that the supervisor can keep their patients safe is to repeat the work that the PA has done because they cannot rely on any PA asking for advice.

Reply 53

Original post
by Flamingo10
The university accepted you onto one of its masters courses so it should be possible for you to transfer to a different masters at the same university with much better prospects for a job.

You would think that... but the only options we were given is to : leave with no compensation, defer , or to go onto non medical related courses such as Law or join the Aldi graduate scheme !

Reply 54

Original post
by Anonymous
You would think that... but the only options we were given is to : leave with no compensation, defer , or to go onto non medical related courses such as Law or join the Aldi graduate scheme !

Are you not able to do a masters in the subject of your first degree?

Reply 56

Does the current UCLAN information about the PA course also contain information about how to join the ALDI graduate scheme after finishing the PA course as this is what their PA course appears to lead to now.

Reply 57

Reply 58

Original post
by Anonymous
I am an MPAS student at uclan, the uni is actually saying they are getting positive vibes from the leng review and less than 12 months ago their employability rate from graduates was 100%. They are submitting evidence towards the leng review to show how robust and rigourous the course is and so is every other PA school. Last year I also attended a meeting when with members of the GMC before regulation when they came to visit uclan and they were very impressed about the structure of the course. Yes you might get placed far on your placements but this is a possibility at any university and on any course.
The university was giving us options on what we could do IF WE wanted to leave the course such as getting a clinical science Bsc or diploma however. They emphasised that they believe it is best if we stay on the course (and finish this current academic year) and wait for the outcome of the leng review before we decide what we'd like to do & again they said from discussions they've has with other universities and this conducting the leng review the future of PAs is looking positive for the next few years. Yes, at the minute job prospects arent the best but this is expected during a time of limbo like this, once this has all blown over there will be an increase in jobs because the GMC wouldn't have regulated PAs if they weren't needed. At the end of the end it's YOUR own decision if you want to do the course, if your bright enough to secure a place then you're more than capable of making a decision based on everything you've seen or heard.
Hi I hav an interview with uclan for Pa in a week any tips ?it’s online panel. Also are u still feeling positive about the PA role? Feel bombarded with the controversies and criticism.

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.