The Student Room Group

University of London Worldwide LLB Law OR University of Law Online LLB Law full-time

Hold two offers from:

A) University of London Worldwide: LLB Law 3 year (distance learning on a self-study basis; link: see below*).
Fees: £2,802 per year if taking maximum of 120 credits as full time student.

B) University of Law: Online LLB Law (full-time) 3 year (link: see below^), fees: £9,250 per year

Future plan: practice in the bar (Barrister in England or plan to go into legal academia with future subsequent postgraduate research degrees).

My query:
Would be great to know if anyone can share their views which one is worth going for. I am very confident self-learner (have plenty of experience doing my professional licensing exams for current work) and am aware of the pitfalls of self-study without tuition guidance as in the case of studying with University of London Worldwide, which I believe I can manage it but my query is more about the quality of the degree, materials and more so, reputation/recognition etc.

What others have said for far:
Uni of Law: reviews offline and online: lack of admin coordination, admin is not too prompt in attending to students’ needs; Uni of Law students in London frequently said law tutors / professors are hardly around, don’t have designated desk or line and are just too busy as most aren’t employed full time by UofLaw, majority of them are ad hocs/adjunct professors with full time professions elsewhere or share their teaching commitments with other unis.

Uni of London Worldwide: many said (via online interaction - FB friends connections) that UoL Worldwide admin isn’t great either; isolation/solitary confinement as described by one student; students can expect to study the entire degree programme with the expectation of having minimum queries as they will not get answer in timely manner but on the positive side: great self-study plans and self-study guides; end of year/end of module exams are well-streamlined with minimum fuss, that is all you have to do is put down effort of self-study, prepare and give exams, end of.

Look forward to views.

——
*https://www.london.ac.uk/study/courses/undergraduate/llb-bachelor-laws

^https://www.law.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/law/llb-hons-law/online/
(edited 3 weeks ago)
Can you please indicate your predicted or achieved sixth form grades and your GCSE results, as advice about choice of university depends on your academic profile.

The University of Law used to be the College of Law, which provided the old style exams for those wishing to be solicitors. It is now owned by a Russian businessman and is a for-profit business, whereas many of the more traditional universities are educational charities. UoL is not research-led. It serves a purpose by providing PGDLs, and professional qualification courses. I would not recommend it as a place to obtain a law degree.

The University of London is nowadays a somewhat curious mixed bag, because its biggest colleges have more or less gone their own ways (UCL, LSE, KCL, QMUH etc*), but LLB (Lond) is a qualification worth having.

Would you not wish to have the university experience of learning with others, socialising with others, and pursuing sports and hobbies? Studying alone could, as you note, be a bit lonely.

If you plan to have a job while at university, have you looked at Birkbeck?

Looking ahead, it is SUPER HARD to obtain a place in barristers' chambers and it is also very hard to obtain a career as a legal academic at a good university. You should try to obtain your first degree from the most academically competitive and rigorous university you can obtain an offer from, and then consider an LLM or BCL and, if taking the academic path, a Doctorate.

If you are intent on study in or near London, and you are academically competitive, I would suggest UCL, KCL, and QMUH. I should disclose an interest and say that I teach part time at UCL, but at present I only teach LLM candidates. I hear somewhat gloomy news from a legal academic friend at LSE about the student experience. RHUL is less competitive, but a friend who teaches law there says it is a pleasant place to study. I also do some occasional teaching at Reading, and think it's an underrated university with a pleasant vibe.



*Imperial College has left the University of London, but doesn't offer law.
(edited 3 weeks ago)
Original post by Stiffy Byng
Can you please indicate your predicted or achieved sixth form grades and your GCSE results, as advice about choice of university depends on your academic profile.
The University of Law used to be the College of Law, which provided the old style exams for those wishing to be solicitors. It is now owned by a Russian businessman and is a for-profit business, whereas many of the more traditional universities are educational charities. UoL is not research-led. It serves a purpose by providing PGDLs, and professional qualification courses. I would not recommend it as a place to obtain a law degree.
The University of London is nowadays a somewhat curious mixed bag, because its biggest colleges have more or less gone their own ways (UCL, LSE, KCL, QMUH etc*), but LLB (Lond) is a qualification worth having.
Would you not wish to have the university experience of learning with others, socialising with others, and pursuing sports and hobbies? Studying alone could, as you note, be a bit lonely.
If you plan to have a job while at university, have you looked at Birkbeck?
Looking ahead, it is SUPER HARD to obtain a place in barristers' chambers and it is also very hard to obtain a career as a legal academic at a good university. You should try to obtain your first degree from the most academically competitive and rigorous university you can obtain an offer from, and then consider an LLM or BCL and, if taking the academic path, a Doctorate.
If you are intent on study in or near London, and you are academically competitive, I would suggest UCL, KCL, and QMUH. I should disclose an interest and say that I teach part time at UCL, but at present I only teach LLM candidates. I hear somewhat gloomy news from a legal academic friend at LSE about the student experience. RHUL is less competitive, but a friend who teaches law there says it is a pleasant place to study. I also do some occasional teaching at Reading, and think it's an underrated university with a pleasant vibe.
*Imperial College has left the University of London, but doesn't offer law.

Thanks for great take up.
I have mediocre A levels equivalent/IB more than 17 years back. Not due to low academic skills but due to other reasons. Am a compliance professional (MCSI) with a major multinational bank, worked as VP level (worked my way up from trainee compliance assistant) and hold Diploma in Investment Compliance with distinction (was made to do/sponsored by the employer), and naturally compliance laws eg FCA, BoE, HMRC and security laws incl landmark case rulings became our niche area of expertises, advising banks‘ CEOs CFOs, governments and institutions.

Reading at a full time university is not possible because of the nature of work (yes, Birkbeck has evening classes but classes start there at 6-7pm and we finish work around 8pm - 10pm due to clients in US time zones). I plan to cut down work by going down the contract route ie working 2-3 days a week but still on those days mean working for long hours hence Birkbeck is not possible.

Only Option:
Self-paced/self-study distance learning or online taught degrees.

University of Law I know because of many of the our legal counsels and in house lawyers I’ve seen are trained in their initial days at U of Law or BPP hence some reputation. University of Law does have full online law degree hence attracted me.

University of London Worldwide (formerly Uni of London External), I came to know accidentally as I never heard of but got to know through social media ads. They offer self-study distance learning LLB Law but no tuition offered.

The other option is Open University’s LLB Law degree. I am also considering this. Open uni offers full online and remote teaching/tuition support.

That’s all I have got to say.
(edited 3 weeks ago)
Original post by UKStudent2016
Hold two offers from:
A) University of London Worldwide: LLB Law 3 year (distance learning on a self-study basis; link: see below*).
Fees: £2,802 per year if taking maximum of 120 credits as full time student.
B) University of Law: Online LLB Law (full-time) 3 year (link: see below^), fees: £9,250 per year
Future plan: practice in the bar (Barrister in England or plan to go into legal academia with future subsequent postgraduate research degrees).
My query:
Would be great to know if anyone can share their views which one is worth going for. I am very confident self-learner (have plenty of experience doing my professional licensing exams for current work) and am aware of the pitfalls of self-study without tuition guidance as in the case of studying with University of London Worldwide, which I believe I can manage it but my query is more about the quality of the degree, materials and more so, reputation/recognition etc.
What others have said for far:
Uni of Law: reviews offline and online: lack of admin coordination, admin is not too prompt in attending to students’ needs; Uni of Law students in London frequently said law tutors / professors are hardly around, don’t have designated desk or line and are just too busy as most aren’t employed full time by UofLaw, majority of them are ad hocs/adjunct professors with full time professions elsewhere or share their teaching commitments with other unis.
Uni of London Worldwide: many said (via online interaction - FB friends connections) that UoL Worldwide admin isn’t great either; isolation/solitary confinement as described by one student; students can expect to study the entire degree programme with the expectation of having minimum queries as they will not get answer in timely manner but on the positive side: great self-study plans and self-study guides; end of year/end of module exams are well-streamlined with minimum fuss, that is all you have to do is put down effort of self-study, prepare and give exams, end of.
Look forward to views.
——
*https://www.london.ac.uk/study/courses/undergraduate/llb-bachelor-laws
^https://www.law.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/law/llb-hons-law/online/

Hello,

When deciding between the University of Law Online LLB and the University of London Worldwide LLB, it’s essential to consider how each program aligns with your career goals, preferred learning style, and priorities in employability support. Both programs have strengths, but they cater to different types of learners and career paths, so it helps to think about what structure and support will best help you achieve your goals.

If you’re considering the University of Law Online LLB, it’s worth noting that this program is crafted to deliver the same quality and structure as the on-campus LLB, but with the flexibility of being fully online. One big advantage here is the practical, career-focused approach of the curriculum. The program is designed not just to teach law but to equip students with the skills they need to succeed in the professional world. Through interactive modules, real-world case studies, and opportunities for pro bono work via ULaw’s clinics, you’ll gain invaluable hands-on experience.

In the ULaw Online LLB, you’ll engage in practical activities, interactive sessions, and even have access to pro bono opportunities through ULaw’s clinics. The online structure is designed to keep you connected with your lecturers, majority of whom are qualified solicitors and barristers. This is particularly helpful if you’re aiming for a career in the legal profession, like becoming a barrister, as you’ll get insights from practicing professionals who can help guide you in developing core skills like analysis, research, problem-solving, and communication—all critical for a future barrister. You’ll also have access to one-on-one feedback, which can be invaluable for keeping up with your studies and ensuring you’re on track.

On the University of London Worldwide side, the course’s reputation is well-regarded globally, especially in academic circles. The self-study model gives you complete flexibility, which can be fantastic if you’re comfortable working independently and can manage the potential isolation that can come with less structured guidance. The resources are very comprehensive, and the end-of-year exams are streamlined for those who prefer to study in bulk and test their knowledge in a more exam-focused way.

If reputation and independence in learning are your priorities, University of London’s program could suit your style well. However, if you value interaction, direct feedback, and a program structured around employability, ULaw’s Online LLB offers a more immersive experience.

Ultimately, your choice might come down to how much you value structured support and employability-oriented training. Both programs offer pathways into respected careers, so you can be confident you’ll gain a solid foundation with either choice.

Best of luck!!
Original post by UKStudent2016
Thanks for great take up.
I have mediocre A levels equivalent/IB more than 17 years back. Not due to low academic skills but due to other reasons. Am a compliance professional (MCSI) with a major multinational bank, worked as VP level (worked my way up from trainee compliance assistant) and hold Diploma in Investment Compliance with distinction (was made to do/sponsored by the employer), and naturally compliance laws eg FCA, BoE, HMRC and security laws incl landmark case rulings became our niche area of expertises, advising banks‘ CEOs CFOs, governments and institutions.
Reading at a full time university is not possible because of the nature of work (yes, Birkbeck has evening classes but classes start there at 6-7pm and we finish work around 8pm - 10pm due to clients in US time zones). I plan to cut down work by going down the contract route ie working 2-3 days a week but still on those days mean working for long hours hence Birkbeck is not possible.
Only Option:
Self-paced/self-study distance learning or online taught degrees.
University of Law I know because of many of the our legal counsels and in house lawyers I’ve seen are trained in their initial days at U of Law or BPP hence some reputation. University of Law does have full online law degree hence attracted me.
University of London Worldwide (formerly Uni of London External), I came to know accidentally as I never heard of but got to know through social media ads. They offer self-study distance learning LLB Law but no tuition offered.
The other option is Open University’s LLB Law degree. I am also considering this. Open uni offers full online and remote teaching/tuition support.
That’s all I have got to say.

OU might be the best bet.

Lots of recently qualified lawyers did professional courses at UoL, after degrees at better universities. The quality of the UoL law degree is, in my view, pretty low.

Why not look into full timing it at a mature student college at one of the big two? Oxford has one such college, and Cambridge has, IIRC, three.
Original post by Stiffy Byng
OU might be the best bet.
Lots of recently qualified lawyers did professional courses at UoL, after degrees at better universities. The quality of the UoL law degree is, in my view, pretty low.
Why not look into full timing it at a mature student college at one of the big two? Oxford has one such college, and Cambridge has, IIRC, three.

Thanks. I guess when you say “UoL” law degree is of low quality, you mean University of London Worldwide, or you meant University of Law?
Original post by UniofLaw Student
Hello,
When deciding between the University of Law Online LLB and the University of London Worldwide LLB, it’s essential to consider how each program aligns with your career goals, preferred learning style, and priorities in employability support. Both programs have strengths, but they cater to different types of learners and career paths, so it helps to think about what structure and support will best help you achieve your goals.
If you’re considering the University of Law Online LLB, it’s worth noting that this program is crafted to deliver the same quality and structure as the on-campus LLB, but with the flexibility of being fully online. One big advantage here is the practical, career-focused approach of the curriculum. The program is designed not just to teach law but to equip students with the skills they need to succeed in the professional world. Through interactive modules, real-world case studies, and opportunities for pro bono work via ULaw’s clinics, you’ll gain invaluable hands-on experience.
In the ULaw Online LLB, you’ll engage in practical activities, interactive sessions, and even have access to pro bono opportunities through ULaw’s clinics. The online structure is designed to keep you connected with your lecturers, majority of whom are qualified solicitors and barristers. This is particularly helpful if you’re aiming for a career in the legal profession, like becoming a barrister, as you’ll get insights from practicing professionals who can help guide you in developing core skills like analysis, research, problem-solving, and communication—all critical for a future barrister. You’ll also have access to one-on-one feedback, which can be invaluable for keeping up with your studies and ensuring you’re on track.
On the University of London Worldwide side, the course’s reputation is well-regarded globally, especially in academic circles. The self-study model gives you complete flexibility, which can be fantastic if you’re comfortable working independently and can manage the potential isolation that can come with less structured guidance. The resources are very comprehensive, and the end-of-year exams are streamlined for those who prefer to study in bulk and test their knowledge in a more exam-focused way.
If reputation and independence in learning are your priorities, University of London’s program could suit your style well. However, if you value interaction, direct feedback, and a program structured around employability, ULaw’s Online LLB offers a more immersive experience.
Ultimately, your choice might come down to how much you value structured support and employability-oriented training. Both programs offer pathways into respected careers, so you can be confident you’ll gain a solid foundation with either choice.
Best of luck!!

Thanks! Much appreciated!
Original post by UKStudent2016
Thanks. I guess when you say “UoL” law degree is of low quality, you mean University of London Worldwide, or you meant University of Law?

I mean University of Law.
Original post by Stiffy Byng
I mean University of Law.

Thanks. So looks like U of Law degrees aren’t reputable, despite majority of lawyers and barristers coming from there.
Original post by UKStudent2016
Thanks. So looks like U of Law degrees aren’t reputable, despite majority of lawyers and barristers coming from there.



The majority of barristers and solicitors do not have degrees from the University of Law. In recent years, people taking professional exam courses have often done so at UoL, BPC, and other such places.

UoL is good at marketing and seeks to give the impression that it is some sort of legal academic powerhouse. It's not. It's a degree shop with a standard entrance offer of BBB.


By the way, barrister is a subset of the set lawyer. All barristers are lawyers. Not all lawyers are barristers.
(edited 3 weeks ago)

Quick Reply