Oxford Law Interviews

@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:
1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?
2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?
3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?
4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?
Cheers!

@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:
1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?
2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?
3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?
4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?
Cheers!

@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:
1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?
2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?
3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?
4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?
Cheers!

I add to the answer above only that you might be interviewed twice by your target college.
I realise that the stress is horrible. I politely suggest that there is no point in trying to calculate odds or draw inferences. All that can do is increase anxiety.
I was interviewed by two colleges and was accepted by the one I had applied to. I then made myself purposely busy by doing a debating competition and taking extra Christmas shifts in my part time job at a bakery, to fill the time between the interviews and the arrival of the offer letter (by snail mail). The letter arrived just before Christmas.
Nowadays you have to wait until about 8 January. I suppose that it is more civilised to give everyone a watchful Christmas rather than to give a big Christmas hamper to some and not to others.
The thing that I deplore about the current system is the long and stressy wait between January and results days to see if you have made the grades. In the previous system, the offer was two Es. That was when everyone did a group of entrance exams in their subjects plus a general paper. Now exams have partly come back in some subjects, but you have the get three As or bust thing.
I wish you all well.

It’s 14 January this year! And you’re exactly right, in this current system (for Oxbridge at least) it’s practically a three-round application.
I’m sure I speak for many of us applicants when I say that I’m checking my inbox every hour. Rationally, I am cognisant that tutors have to make incredibly tough choices between thousands of applicants, and can often only discriminate on the basis of minutiae. But my unreasonable side is asking, how long can this possibly take??
“Mid-November to early December” is an excruciatingly long period for which to wait for either an invitation to interview or a rejection. Forget Oxbridge, having to wait until MAY at the latest for other universities is preposterous. How can A-Level students be expected to press on and stay motivated when they don’t even know if they’ll go to university? I get the point of having “safety schools”, but by essence they aren’t your top choices.
I just resign myself to the fact that this is a universal struggle. We’re rather lucky to be applying now than twenty years down the line when things are likely to be drastically different, possibly for the worse. All Y13s right now, I feel you 😔.

I think that the UK should radically overhaul the system so that everyone applies to university with achieved sixth form grades. All offers would then be unconditional. It would be great to see a State funded gap year for everyone, This will never happen!
As for the Oxford decision process, I don't think that it turns on minutiae so much as impression at interview. I have been told by tutors that the interviews are more about "no, you're out" than "yes, you're in".
Those interviewed appear on paper to be "Oxford material". Each applicant then has the chance to talk him or herself out of a place by not doing well at the interview (the tutors make allowance for nerves). The tutors are looking for that magical quality of "teachability", in a system in which teaching is carried out through a personal pedagogical relationship between tutor and pupil.
The system is of course imperfect. Each year Oxford rejects some people whom it ought to have accepted and accepts some people whom it ought to have rejected. Each year some students arrive at Oxford and realise that they don't want to be there. It's a human system, with the flaws of all systems made by humans. There is no AI method of selection.
Hang tough!

I add that I have been told that some people are so dazzling on paper that they can survive a bad interview and still obtain an offer. Those who look OK on but freeze up to an extent greater than nerves can reasonably excuse, or don't keep to the point, or seem a bit rigid, may get the chop.
I think that the tutors try super hard to be fair, but they are human, and they have to face teaching a person for three or four years, so try not to be boring. Being boring is the greatest sin in Oxford, a place which prides itself on wit.

An interesting perspective! Hoping I get an interview, I’m actually very excited to see what it’s like.

I hope you do too. I added a few words after you posted.

My interview started poorly (nerves) but my responses improved as it went on without a noticeable change in question difficulty. If anything, I tackled the scenario given to me at the end brilliantly, and was cut off before I could finish on account of time. What do you reckon?

I hope you do too. I added a few words after you posted.