The Student Room Group

Oxford Law Interviews

@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:

1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?

2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?

3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?

4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?

Cheers!

Reply 1

Original post
by Anonymous
@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:
1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?
2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?
3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?
4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?
Cheers!


@Stiffy_Byng

Reply 2

Original post
by Anonymous
@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:
1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?
2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?
3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?
4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?
Cheers!

1.

No

2.

Not necessarily

3.

Yes

4.

Only if you get an offer

Reply 3

Original post
by Anonymous
@Stiffy Byng thought you might know the answers to some of these questions:
1. Do all Oxford Law applicants receive 2 interviews by default?
2. Does having your second interview at a different college mean that your first college has rejected you, and that you have been reallocated/pooled?
3. Could the college that first interviewed you still take you if you had a second interview elsewhere?
4. Is only one interview generally indicative of a positive impression?
Cheers!

I add to the answer above only that you might be interviewed twice by your target college.

I realise that the stress is horrible. I politely suggest that there is no point in trying to calculate odds or draw inferences. All that can do is increase anxiety.

I was interviewed by two colleges and was accepted by the one I had applied to. I then made myself purposely busy by doing a debating competition and taking extra Christmas shifts in my part time job at a bakery, to fill the time between the interviews and the arrival of the offer letter (by snail mail). The letter arrived just before Christmas.

Nowadays you have to wait until about 8 January. I suppose that it is more civilised to give everyone a watchful Christmas rather than to give a big Christmas hamper to some and not to others.

The thing that I deplore about the current system is the long and stressy wait between January and results days to see if you have made the grades. In the previous system, the offer was two Es. That was when everyone did a group of entrance exams in their subjects plus a general paper. Now exams have partly come back in some subjects, but you have the get three As or bust thing.

I wish you all well.

Reply 4

Original post
by Stiffy Byng
I add to the answer above only that you might be interviewed twice by your target college.
I realise that the stress is horrible. I politely suggest that there is no point in trying to calculate odds or draw inferences. All that can do is increase anxiety.
I was interviewed by two colleges and was accepted by the one I had applied to. I then made myself purposely busy by doing a debating competition and taking extra Christmas shifts in my part time job at a bakery, to fill the time between the interviews and the arrival of the offer letter (by snail mail). The letter arrived just before Christmas.
Nowadays you have to wait until about 8 January. I suppose that it is more civilised to give everyone a watchful Christmas rather than to give a big Christmas hamper to some and not to others.
The thing that I deplore about the current system is the long and stressy wait between January and results days to see if you have made the grades. In the previous system, the offer was two Es. That was when everyone did a group of entrance exams in their subjects plus a general paper. Now exams have partly come back in some subjects, but you have the get three As or bust thing.
I wish you all well.


It’s 14 January this year! And you’re exactly right, in this current system (for Oxbridge at least) it’s practically a three-round application.

I’m sure I speak for many of us applicants when I say that I’m checking my inbox every hour. Rationally, I am cognisant that tutors have to make incredibly tough choices between thousands of applicants, and can often only discriminate on the basis of minutiae. But my unreasonable side is asking, how long can this possibly take??

“Mid-November to early December” is an excruciatingly long period for which to wait for either an invitation to interview or a rejection. Forget Oxbridge, having to wait until MAY at the latest for other universities is preposterous. How can A-Level students be expected to press on and stay motivated when they don’t even know if they’ll go to university? I get the point of having “safety schools”, but by essence they aren’t your top choices.

I just resign myself to the fact that this is a universal struggle. We’re rather lucky to be applying now than twenty years down the line when things are likely to be drastically different, possibly for the worse. All Y13s right now, I feel you 😔.

Reply 5

Original post
by Anonymous
It’s 14 January this year! And you’re exactly right, in this current system (for Oxbridge at least) it’s practically a three-round application.
I’m sure I speak for many of us applicants when I say that I’m checking my inbox every hour. Rationally, I am cognisant that tutors have to make incredibly tough choices between thousands of applicants, and can often only discriminate on the basis of minutiae. But my unreasonable side is asking, how long can this possibly take??
“Mid-November to early December” is an excruciatingly long period for which to wait for either an invitation to interview or a rejection. Forget Oxbridge, having to wait until MAY at the latest for other universities is preposterous. How can A-Level students be expected to press on and stay motivated when they don’t even know if they’ll go to university? I get the point of having “safety schools”, but by essence they aren’t your top choices.
I just resign myself to the fact that this is a universal struggle. We’re rather lucky to be applying now than twenty years down the line when things are likely to be drastically different, possibly for the worse. All Y13s right now, I feel you 😔.

I think that the UK should radically overhaul the system so that everyone applies to university with achieved sixth form grades. All offers would then be unconditional. It would be great to see a State funded gap year for everyone, This will never happen!

As for the Oxford decision process, I don't think that it turns on minutiae so much as impression at interview. I have been told by tutors that the interviews are more about "no, you're out" than "yes, you're in".

Those interviewed appear on paper to be "Oxford material". Each applicant then has the chance to talk him or herself out of a place by not doing well at the interview (the tutors make allowance for nerves). The tutors are looking for that magical quality of "teachability", in a system in which teaching is carried out through a personal pedagogical relationship between tutor and pupil.

The system is of course imperfect. Each year Oxford rejects some people whom it ought to have accepted and accepts some people whom it ought to have rejected. Each year some students arrive at Oxford and realise that they don't want to be there. It's a human system, with the flaws of all systems made by humans. There is no AI method of selection.

Hang tough!

Reply 6

Original post
by Stiffy Byng
I think that the UK should radically overhaul the system so that everyone applies to university with achieved sixth form grades. All offers would then be unconditional. It would be great to see a State funded gap year for everyone, This will never happen!
As for the Oxford decision process, I don't think that it turns on minutiae so much as impression at interview. I have been told by tutors that the interviews are more about "no, you're out" than "yes, you're in".
Those interviewed appear on paper to be "Oxford material". Each applicant then has the chance to talk him or herself out of a place by not doing well at the interview (the tutors make allowance for nerves). The tutors are looking for that magical quality of "teachability", in a system in which teaching is carried out through a personal pedagogical relationship between tutor and pupil.
The system is of course imperfect. Each year Oxford rejects some people whom it ought to have accepted and accepts some people whom it ought to have rejected. Each year some students arrive at Oxford and realise that they don't want to be there. It's a human system, with the flaws of all systems made by humans. There is no AI method of selection.
Hang tough!


That’s brilliantly insightful!

What do you suggest an applicant can do to really stand out to tutors?

What common pitfalls generally lead to rejection?

Lastly, what really shows “teachability” as true “Oxford material”? I’m thoughtful that there probably isn’t a general archetypal “Oxford student”, but there are certainly common characteristics to have landed them there.

Reply 7

I am sorry but I can't usefully answer that, because I have never interviewed anyone for a place at any university.

An obvious error would be to evade the question or to answer the question you wish you had been asked, not the question that you were asked.

Over confidence does not go down well. There was a poster here a year or so ago who thought that he was entitled by social class to go to Oxford or Cambridge. He was rejected and took to ranting about what terrible universities they are. Don't be that person!

I think that the things the tutors look for include the following. Curiosity. Flexibility. Appetite to understand everything about everything. Willingness to argue a point but also to listen and accept guidance. Evidence of depth of understanding derived from deep and wide reading. Evidence of rational scepticism and independence of mind. Learning worn lightly.

E M Forster said "only connect". The ideal Oxford student, if there is such a person, might be a bit of a polymath, at least within the range of humanities or sciences.

Reply 8

I add that I have been told that some people are so dazzling on paper that they can survive a bad interview and still obtain an offer. Those who look OK on paper but freeze up to an extent greater than nerves can reasonably excuse, or don't keep to the point, or seem a bit rigid in their thinking, may get the chop.

I think that the tutors try super hard to be fair, but they are human, and they have to face teaching a person for three or four years, so try not to be boring. Being boring is the greatest sin in Oxford, a place which prides itself on wit. This does not mean that you have to be Blackadder. You do not have to put on a performance. Just be that thoughtful and intellectually curious late teenager who can see beyond the narrow compass of the A level syllabus.

Reply 9

Original post
by Stiffy Byng
I add that I have been told that some people are so dazzling on paper that they can survive a bad interview and still obtain an offer. Those who look OK on but freeze up to an extent greater than nerves can reasonably excuse, or don't keep to the point, or seem a bit rigid, may get the chop.
I think that the tutors try super hard to be fair, but they are human, and they have to face teaching a person for three or four years, so try not to be boring. Being boring is the greatest sin in Oxford, a place which prides itself on wit.


An interesting perspective! Hoping I get an interview, I’m actually very excited to see what it’s like.

Reply 10

Original post
by Anonymous
An interesting perspective! Hoping I get an interview, I’m actually very excited to see what it’s like.

I hope you do too. I added a few words after you posted.

Reply 11

Original post
by Stiffy Byng
I hope you do too. I added a few words after you posted.


My interview started poorly (nerves) but my responses improved as it went on without a noticeable change in question difficulty. If anything, I tackled the scenario given to me at the end brilliantly, and was cut off before I could finish on account of time. What do you reckon?

Reply 12

Original post
by Anonymous
My interview started poorly (nerves) but my responses improved as it went on without a noticeable change in question difficulty. If anything, I tackled the scenario given to me at the end brilliantly, and was cut off before I could finish on account of time. What do you reckon?

No idea! All you can do is wait. Good luck!

Reply 13

Original post
by Stiffy Byng
I hope you do too. I added a few words after you posted.


Thank you for your support, I’m thrilled to share that I got an offer today! Stiffy Byng, you have been an incredible help throughout this process. I am so grateful for your presence on these forums to answer our sometimes incessant questions. Hopefully when I start, I can pass it on. I would be pleased being even a fraction as helpful as you have been.

Reply 14

Congrats!

Thanks also for your kind words.

Reply 15

Original post
by Anonymous
Thank you for your support, I’m thrilled to share that I got an offer today! Stiffy Byng, you have been an incredible help throughout this process. I am so grateful for your presence on these forums to answer our sometimes incessant questions. Hopefully when I start, I can pass it on. I would be pleased being even a fraction as helpful as you have been.

Did you get in?

Reply 16

Original post
by janeeire244
Did you get in?

This year's A Level results are to be published on 14 August 2025. Unless Anonymous did the IB, or took A levels last year, he or she won't yet know if he or she has obtained the grades required to take up his or her offer of a place at Oxford.
(edited 9 months ago)

Reply 17

Original post
by Stiffy Byng
This year's A Level results are to be published on 14 August 2025. Unless Anonymous did the IB, or took A levels last year, he or she won't yet know if he or she has obtained the grades required to take up his or her offer of a place at oxford.


I did A-levels, so still waiting.

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.