Critically discuss law questions

how do I ensure I am critically engaging with my law summative essay instead of providing loads of evidence and no explanation?

Reply 1

UniofLaw Student

Official Rep

Original post

by h322

how do I ensure I am critically engaging with my law summative essay instead of providing loads of evidence and no explanation?

Hi,

When critically evaluating a topic and presenting both sides of an argument, the first step is to clearly introduce the issue at hand. This allows you to establish the context for the debate and outline the key question or legal issue you're addressing. Once the issue is defined, the next step is to present the first side of the argument. This involves explaining the viewpoint or perspective held by scholars, commentators, or legal experts, supported by relevant evidence, case law, or theoretical arguments. By doing so, you present the reasoning and justifications that underpin this particular stance.

Following this, it’s essential to present the opposing side of the argument. This involves detailing a contrasting viewpoint or interpretation, supported by different evidence or reasoning. Just as with the first side, you should present the core arguments and theories that shape this opposing perspective. After laying out both sides, it’s important to critically compare and contrast the arguments. Here, you assess the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective, pointing out any contradictions, flaws, or areas where one side may lack support or fail to fully address the issue at hand. This critical assessment demonstrates your ability to engage with the arguments beyond merely summarising them.

Finally, after evaluating both sides, you should conclude by offering your own opinion. This involves explaining which side you find more convincing, supported by logical reasoning and evidence. By presenting both sides and critically engaging with them, you demonstrate a nuanced and balanced approach to the topic, making your argument stronger and more credible.

Reply 2

Stiffy Byng

Talk to your tutor about this.

Reply 3

UoL Students

Official Rep

Original post

by h322

how do I ensure I am critically engaging with my law summative essay instead of providing loads of evidence and no explanation?

Hello @h322,

When a law question is asking for critical analysis, they are essentially asking for your opinion regarding whether the law in question is correct or not, and if it is not correct what the law ought to be. To do this, you should consider whether the law is achieving the aim it sets out to achieve. Many law academics don't really care what you argue, they just want an interesting unique response which is well thought-out.

You should engage with legislation and case law to explain why it is or is not correct and how, if it is not correct, it could be improved. You should then look at different academic journal articles considering the same debate. You should consider both sides of the argument, and for the opposing side you should develop your own argument by considering why the opposition are wrong and why your argument is the correct way of thinking about the law.

I reiterate that there is no formula or set way to structure or write an answer to a question asking for critical analysis. There is only one correct way of structuring and answering a law essay question and that is your way. Make it unique and engaging.

I hope this helps, if you have any further questions please do let me know.

Charlie
Law LLB Student

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Articles for you

Personal statement secrets – universities reveal all

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.

Try out the app

Continue on web

Critically discuss law questions

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Articles for you

How The Student Room is moderated