The Student Room Group

Btec Law Pre-Release Exam Material 2025 (January Exam)

Hi everyone,

I’m working through the BTEC Law Pre-Release Exam Material 2025 (January Exam), and I’ve been analyzing the articles and creating my two A4 notes

For Article 1, I think it’s most likely about Unlawful Act Manslaughter, but could it also be Gross Negligence Manslaughter? What do you think? Which one fits better, and why?

For Article 2, it seems to involve Criminal Damage. What potential defenses do you think could apply here? For example, could Intoxication, Duress By Threat, Automatism and Insanity

Would love to hear your thoughts! Let’s discuss!

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Could you also guess the potential Police Power that could be involved, Detentions, S&S, Interviews

Reply 2

Hey! So these are my thoughts:

1) UAM with unlawful act being assault or harassment. No evidence is given of a trip hazard, and on a busy street I cannot think of many circumstances that constitute gross negligence re trip hazards. When considering other prereleases, we are given way less info in this one that usual- leading me to believe the “chasing” is extremely relevant. If it is GNM- 90% of the time you can still argue it as UAM if you think creatively. For UAM, the chasing does not need to be direct to the victim, but only that it was an unlawful act and it carried danger to the welfare of any persons. The degree does not need to be foreseeable to D or RM.

Police powers- include them all. Jan 2024 examiners report states no info is available about potential PP in prerelease- and they can work retroactively; e.g they mention detention in prerelease but they go back in time to stop and search before arrest. Don’T risk it.

2) Criminal Damage with arson. Include both basic and aggravated offences (as hotel, even though derelict, could be seen as endangering human life if there were squatters etc), remember D is charged with BOTH criminal damage AND arson as 2 separate offenses. Consider lawful excuses also in s10 CDA.

Defences- personally, I omitted self defence as an option as I struggle to see how D was protecting themselves by setting fire to a derelict building. When it comes to mens rea which is established in part b, immediately note if it is recklessness or intended. This impacts what defences you can or cannot use (specific and basic offence defences). If I were you, include all of defence apart from self defence.

Reply 3

can someone droop their law unit 3 notes please for this for everyone else to get a rough idea

Reply 4

Hiya all, I was going through my 2 sider notes for Unit 3 exam. I was wondering what defences it could be?? My opinion is self defence/duress for activity 1 and then for activity 2 i was thinking intoxication or insanity

Reply 5

Original post
by gruesome-acquit
Hiya all, I was going through my 2 sider notes for Unit 3 exam. I was wondering what defences it could be?? My opinion is self defence/duress for activity 1 and then for activity 2 i was thinking intoxication or insanity

What do you mean, defences are activity 2 only

Reply 6

defences are activity 2 while police powers are activity 1..

Reply 7

Original post
by ryanjx
Hey! So these are my thoughts:
1) UAM with unlawful act being assault or harassment. No evidence is given of a trip hazard, and on a busy street I cannot think of many circumstances that constitute gross negligence re trip hazards. When considering other prereleases, we are given way less info in this one that usual- leading me to believe the “chasing” is extremely relevant. If it is GNM- 90% of the time you can still argue it as UAM if you think creatively. For UAM, the chasing does not need to be direct to the victim, but only that it was an unlawful act and it carried danger to the welfare of any persons. The degree does not need to be foreseeable to D or RM.
Police powers- include them all. Jan 2024 examiners report states no info is available about potential PP in prerelease- and they can work retroactively; e.g they mention detention in prerelease but they go back in time to stop and search before arrest. Don’T risk it.
2) Criminal Damage with arson. Include both basic and aggravated offences (as hotel, even though derelict, could be seen as endangering human life if there were squatters etc), remember D is charged with BOTH criminal damage AND arson as 2 separate offenses. Consider lawful excuses also in s10 CDA.
Defences- personally, I omitted self defence as an option as I struggle to see how D was protecting themselves by setting fire to a derelict building. When it comes to mens rea which is established in part b, immediately note if it is recklessness or intended. This impacts what defences you can or cannot use (specific and basic offence defences). If I were you, include all of defence apart from self defence.

bro please could u send the notes just for guidance would mean a lot fr

Reply 8

can someone show me what they've wrote for the exam notes pls?

Reply 9

Original post
by saddahvcfgbn
Hi everyone,
I’m working through the BTEC Law Pre-Release Exam Material 2025 (January Exam), and I’ve been analyzing the articles and creating my two A4 notes
For Article 1, I think it’s most likely about Unlawful Act Manslaughter, but could it also be Gross Negligence Manslaughter? What do you think? Which one fits better, and why?
For Article 2, it seems to involve Criminal Damage. What potential defenses do you think could apply here? For example, could Intoxication, Duress By Threat, Automatism and Insanity
Would love to hear your thoughts! Let’s discuss!

I think Unlawful Act Manslaughter fits better but if u have time deffinitely show ur argument for Gross Negligence Manslaughter too as an alternative, gets u more marks

Reply 10

Original post
by K31RN3271
can i have ur email and i will email what i have across to u

if its been approved by ur teacher and she says they're good can u send it me

Reply 11

Original post
by ryanjx
Hey! So these are my thoughts:
1) UAM with unlawful act being assault or harassment. No evidence is given of a trip hazard, and on a busy street I cannot think of many circumstances that constitute gross negligence re trip hazards. When considering other prereleases, we are given way less info in this one that usual- leading me to believe the “chasing” is extremely relevant. If it is GNM- 90% of the time you can still argue it as UAM if you think creatively. For UAM, the chasing does not need to be direct to the victim, but only that it was an unlawful act and it carried danger to the welfare of any persons. The degree does not need to be foreseeable to D or RM.
Police powers- include them all. Jan 2024 examiners report states no info is available about potential PP in prerelease- and they can work retroactively; e.g they mention detention in prerelease but they go back in time to stop and search before arrest. Don’T risk it.
2) Criminal Damage with arson. Include both basic and aggravated offences (as hotel, even though derelict, could be seen as endangering human life if there were squatters etc), remember D is charged with BOTH criminal damage AND arson as 2 separate offenses. Consider lawful excuses also in s10 CDA.
Defences- personally, I omitted self defence as an option as I struggle to see how D was protecting themselves by setting fire to a derelict building. When it comes to mens rea which is established in part b, immediately note if it is recklessness or intended. This impacts what defences you can or cannot use (specific and basic offence defences). If I were you, include all of defence apart from self defence.

please can i havee ur notes i beg u . add my snap @usmell247

Reply 12

Original post
by hdwdwd
please can i havee ur notes i beg u . add my snap @usmell247

i dont have snap otherwhise i would send u some that i have made. :frown:
(edited 10 months ago)

Reply 13

Original post
by K31RN3271
i dont have snap otherwhise i would send u some that i have made. :frown:

did u include both aggravated and basic for activity 2. and all the defences?

Reply 14

Original post
by hdwdwd
did u include both aggravated and basic for activity 2. and all the defences?

not defences yet

Reply 15

Original post
by saddahvcfgbn
Hi everyone,
I’m working through the BTEC Law Pre-Release Exam Material 2025 (January Exam), and I’ve been analyzing the articles and creating my two A4 notes
For Article 1, I think it’s most likely about Unlawful Act Manslaughter, but could it also be Gross Negligence Manslaughter? What do you think? Which one fits better, and why?
For Article 2, it seems to involve Criminal Damage. What potential defenses do you think could apply here? For example, could Intoxication, Duress By Threat, Automatism and Insanity
Would love to hear your thoughts! Let’s discuss!

i think activity one is definitely unlawful act manslaughter and for activity 2 i think the most probable defence to come up is intoxication or duress and least likely self defence i also don’t know if it would be automatism as it seems unlikely someone would set fire to a building in an automatic state but it could be.

Reply 16

Original post
by gruesome-acquit
Hiya all, I was going through my 2 sider notes for Unit 3 exam. I was wondering what defences it could be?? My opinion is self defence/duress for activity 1 and then for activity 2 i was thinking intoxication or insanity

hey you do not apply defences in activity 1 only activity 2

Reply 17

Original post
by hdwdwd
please can i havee ur notes i beg u . add my snap @usmell247

i can send you mine i’ll add you my name is erin

Reply 18

Original post
by hdwdwd
did u include both aggravated and basic for activity 2. and all the defences?

yes

Reply 19

Original post
by erinb222
i can send you mine i’ll add you my name is erin

hey can you send your snap and please show me your notes i want to compare mine with yours if thats ok

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.