The Student Room Group

City University of London law

Is City London law school legit ?
Well, City isn't a money laundromat for the Camorra or the Yakuza, if that helps.

City is part of the University of London. As places to study law go, City is middling. It's not terrible, but it's not great. It is OK for PGDLs and what not, but not an ideal place to study for a degree in law.
Reply 2
🤣 are you a reliable source though ? What made you come to this conclusion ?
Isn't it City St George's University of London now? Anyway, reputation-wise it isn't great for Law.
Reply 4
Original post by Academic007
Isn't it City St George's University of London now? Anyway, reputation-wise it isn't great for Law.


Would you say Westminster has a better reputation for law even though it ranks lower than City Uni. Also on the world and UK rankings City is ranked higher than SOAS
Original post by Nathan_33
Would you say Westminster has a better reputation for law even though it ranks lower than City Uni. Also on the world and UK rankings City is ranked higher than SOAS

Rankings matter less than where top law firms actively recruit and I would neither Westminister nor City are sought after by Big firms. SOAS is probably better but it's a relatively small university and tends to favor diversity candidates. I would say non-RG universities such as Kent or UEA would offer superior prospects for their graduates. Apart from that literally any RG uni would be good.
(edited 1 month ago)
Reply 6
Original post by Academic007
Rankings matter less than where top law firms actively recruit and I would neither Westminister nor City are sought after by Big firms. SOAS is probably better but it's a relatively small university and tends to favor diversity candidates. I would say non-RG universities such as Kent or UEA would offer superior prospects for their graduates. Apart from that literally any RG uni would be good.


I do know that going to a non RG uni will put me at a disadvantage, but I’ve heard that that’s less important as it once was. I just don’t want to move out and have to deal with extra costs for a uni that’s not even RG. But if it comes to SOAS, City or Kent you think it would be best to choose Kent ?
Original post by Nathan_33
I do know that going to a non RG uni will put me at a disadvantage, but I’ve heard that that’s less important as it once was. I just don’t want to move out and have to deal with extra costs for a uni that’s not even RG. But if it comes to SOAS, City or Kent you think it would be best to choose Kent ?

Yes, Kent and UEA are probably the top 2 non-RG unis for Law. SOAS is good too, I think it's similar to RG in some ways but I hear the teaching isn't great and that the most successful candidates are diversity grads(nothing wrong with that just saying).
Original post by Nathan_33
🤣 are you a reliable source though ? What made you come to this conclusion ?

I am a practising barrister and teach part time at UCL. City's reputation in the legal profession is middling. One member of the academic staff at City recently co-edited a law book which is remarkably inaccurate and misleading. This does not reflect well on the academic standards at City.
Reply 9
Original post by Stiffy Byng
I am a practising barrister and teach part time at UCL. City's reputation in the legal profession is middling. One member of the academic staff at City recently co-edited a law book which is remarkably inaccurate and misleading. This does not reflect well on the academic standards at City.


Oh wow ok so what’s your opinion on SOAS law school and Kent law school because those are my other options but I’d rather stay in London
Original post by Nathan_33
I do know that going to a non RG uni will put me at a disadvantage, but I’ve heard that that’s less important as it once was. I just don’t want to move out and have to deal with extra costs for a uni that’s not even RG. But if it comes to SOAS, City or Kent you think it would be best to choose Kent ?

Have you considered QMUL or RHUL? What sort of academic credentials do you have or expect to obtain?
Reply 11
Original post by Stiffy Byng
Have you considered QMUL or RHUL? What sort of academic credentials do you have or expect to obtain?


Well I got rejected from QMUL, my predicted are AAA, but I have average GCSE’s and they wanted AAA* for QMUL.
Reply 12
And I do want to be in the legal field and I am aware that the university you go to matters to a certain extent but by how much?
Original post by Nathan_33
Oh wow ok so what’s your opinion on SOAS law school and Kent law school because those are my other options but I’d rather stay in London

I don't know much about either, although each is reasonably well thought of.

Law firms and barristers' chambers often conduct recruitment exercises university blind, so I suggest that you don't fixate on rankings (which are compiled on fairly spurious bases in any event).

It is a good idea to aim for the most academically demanding university you can obtain a place at. Doing so may better equip you to be competitive in the professional job market.
Reply 14
Original post by Stiffy Byng
I don't know much about either, although each is reasonably well thought of.
Law firms and barristers' chambers often conduct recruitment exercises university blind, so I suggest that you don't fixate on rankings (which are compiled on fairly spurious bases in any event).
It is a good idea to aim for the most academically demanding university you can obtain a place at. Doing so may better equip you to be competitive in the professional job market.


This really helps, I was reading about blind applications which gave me hope. But yeah rankings matter less and less now. Thank you for the help though 👍
Original post by Nathan_33
This really helps, I was reading about blind applications which gave me hope. But yeah rankings matter less and less now. Thank you for the help though 👍

Rankings have never mattered. Employers seek talent. They hire individuals, not universities. Talented people tend to congregate at a relatively small number of well-resourced universities, although talented people can of course be found anywhere.

Sensible employers try to break the habit of hiring people from the same universities by blind recruitment systems. They care not two hoots about rankings.
Reply 16
Original post by Stiffy Byng
Rankings have never mattered. Employers seek talent. They hire individuals, not universities. Talented people tend to congregate at a relatively small number of well-resourced universities, although talented people can of course be found anywhere.
Sensible employers try to break the habit of hiring people from the same universities by blind recruitment systems. They care not two hoots about rankings.


That’s great to hear because that worry has always been in the back of my head.
Original post by Nathan_33
That’s great to hear because that worry has always been in the back of my head.

Don’t believe it, RG unis are better connected to industry and more respected as academic institutions. It’s not only a question of ‘talent’ and being well resourced. Very few law firms recruit without looking at universities and the US firms in particular are incredibly biased.

Quick Reply