Have I made a bad degree choice?

I don't see why you think you made a wrong decision. You clearly stated you're not that interested in the biosciences and research in practice, and you are really interested in history as an academic subject, and are aware of the varied areas you could go into afterwards even if you don't pursue a graduate degree in history.
Also because of the poor employability of bioscience graduates the government commissioned an inquiry into that (and some other STEM subjects) about 10 years ago. The reality is your degree subject doesn't actually make a difference in whether you will get a job (and research has found that STEM and non-STEM graduates have equivalent career outcomes within 10 years of graduation). Also the majority of graduate employers simply don't care what subject you studied as most grad schemes are generalist schemes for any grad, including many in the civil service, investment banking and management consulting, accountancy and other financial services sector roles, the media, other corporate roles in e.g. management, sales, marketing etc, legal roles (you can become a lawyer of either variety with any initial undergraduate degree with certain additional steps), teaching, etc, etc.
You aren't going to have a better or worse chance of getting a job after graduating because you did or didn't do a STEM degree. What will make a difference is what you do to make yourself employable, regardless of your degree subject, by aggressively pursuing work experience opportunities, internships, etc throughout the course. As well as engaging in e.g. leadership roles in societies or similar to develop relevant transferable skills/concrete examples of where you've demonstrated the behaviours employers are looking for, and preparing for the psychometric tests and other assessment centre exercises which will be used to screen applicants.
At the end of the day employers aren't screening applicants by saying "candidate A did Y degree and candidate B did X degree, therefore we won't continue with candidate A", they are going to be looking at those other things - performance on the psychometric tests and assessment centre exercises, how well you are able to convey in interview the relevant behaviours and skills through examples where you demonstrated them from whatever activity (academic, co-curricular, or ideally professional) and work experience i.e. internships and similar with references.

Thank you!!!

I've been torn between studying biology and history at university for a while, but recently I’ve decided that to study history. I was studying History, English, Biology, and Chemistry, but I’ve since dropped Chemistry so I can focus on getting 3 good A-level grades.
Now, though, I’m second-guessing my decision.
I love history and am really passionate about a career in academia, but I’m open to other fields like journalism, publishing, teaching and politics if that doesn’t work out. And, I think doing history degree would provide me with the skills needed for these fields.
But, I also love biology, especially genetics. But, overtime I’ve found that the idea of doing research and making new scientific discoveries only sounded fun on paper, and in practice it’s not for me. I like learning about biology, but it’s more of an interest than a career path for me.
However, now I’m worried I’ve made the wrong decision. A lot of people at my school are very judgmental if your not interested in a STEM degree or law, and I’m worried I’ll struggle to find a job after my degree..
Any advice?

I've been torn between studying biology and history at university for a while, but recently I’ve decided that to study history. I was studying History, English, Biology, and Chemistry, but I’ve since dropped Chemistry so I can focus on getting 3 good A-level grades.
Now, though, I’m second-guessing my decision.
I love history and am really passionate about a career in academia, but I’m open to other fields like journalism, publishing, teaching and politics if that doesn’t work out. And, I think doing history degree would provide me with the skills needed for these fields.
But, I also love biology, especially genetics. But, overtime I’ve found that the idea of doing research and making new scientific discoveries only sounded fun on paper, and in practice it’s not for me. I like learning about biology, but it’s more of an interest than a career path for me.
However, now I’m worried I’ve made the wrong decision. A lot of people at my school are very judgmental if your not interested in a STEM degree or law, and I’m worried I’ll struggle to find a job after my degree..
Any advice?

I've been torn between studying biology and history at university for a while, but recently I’ve decided that to study history. I was studying History, English, Biology, and Chemistry, but I’ve since dropped Chemistry so I can focus on getting 3 good A-level grades.
Now, though, I’m second-guessing my decision.
I love history and am really passionate about a career in academia, but I’m open to other fields like journalism, publishing, teaching and politics if that doesn’t work out. And, I think doing history degree would provide me with the skills needed for these fields.
But, I also love biology, especially genetics. But, overtime I’ve found that the idea of doing research and making new scientific discoveries only sounded fun on paper, and in practice it’s not for me. I like learning about biology, but it’s more of an interest than a career path for me.
However, now I’m worried I’ve made the wrong decision. A lot of people at my school are very judgmental if your not interested in a STEM degree or law, and I’m worried I’ll struggle to find a job after my degree..
Any advice?