Oxford vs UCL masters in archaeology

Hi everyone I was hoping to get advice on whether to choose Oxford or UCL for a masters in archaeology. UCL has my dream program which is bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology and I really love the course but on the other hand how can I say no to Oxford it's a dream. The Oxford course just focuses on archaeological science and no forensics and it's three courses compared to UCL (7) but I am not guaranteed to get a spot in the biomolecular archaeology class at UCL since it is an optional module that priorities those doing environmental archaeology. I'm not sure whether to prioritise reputation over academics in this case especially as an international student who wants to work abroad. Any help or advice would be much appreciated.