How/why does a concentration-time graph determine the order of a reaction?
Considering the relevant rate equations
Zero order: rate = k
First order: rate = k[A]
Second order: rate = k[A]^2
You might recognise that the rate of a reaction is the gradient of a concentration-time graph.
For a zero-order reaction, the gradient is a constant and so you get a straight line.
If you have studied A level maths or equivalent (in particular the integration topics covered towards the end of the course), you will recognise that the rate of the reaction is a derivative with respect to time (in this case -d[A]/dt, the negative sign assigned because as time progresses [A] depletes) and so you can form differential equations to find the relationship between [A] and t for first and second order reactions. The results should be as follows:
First order: [A] = [A]0 exp(-kt)
Second order: [A] = [A]0 / (1 + kt[A]0)
Where [A]0 is just the initial concentration of substance A.
The result is you get completely different shapes of graph depending on the order of reaction with respect to your reactant.
Considering the relevant rate equations Zero order: rate = k First order: rate = k[A] Second order: rate = k[A]^2 You might recognise that the rate of a reaction is the gradient of a concentration-time graph. For a zero-order reaction, the gradient is a constant and so you get a straight line. If you have studied A level maths or equivalent (in particular the integration topics covered towards the end of the course), you will recognise that the rate of the reaction is a derivative with respect to time (in this case -d[A]/dt, the negative sign assigned because as time progresses [A] depletes) and so you can form differential equations to find the relationship between [A] and t for first and second order reactions. The results should be as follows: First order: [A] = [A]0 exp(-kt) Second order: [A] = [A]0 / (1 + kt[A]0) Where [A]0 is just the initial concentration of substance A. The result is you get completely different shapes of graph depending on the order of reaction with respect to your reactant.
Thank you, I understand now. But how does it work chemically? For example, why does the concentration of a reactant with zero order change linearly over time?
Thank you, I understand now. But how does it work chemically? For example, why does the concentration of a reactant with zero order change linearly over time?
Put simply, the answer is that it’s purely a mathematical coincidence - you get a differential equation of the form d[A]/dt = -k and it just so happens to be solved by the equation of a straight line, [A] = [A]0 - kt.
If you want a more intellectually satisfying answer, I suppose you could instead inquire as to why reactants can be assigned orders of 0, 1 or 2 (in simple cases). For that, you need to understand reaction mechanisms. These unfortunately often aren’t taught brilliantly and hopefully a quick explainer will be of some use to you.
101 Simple reaction mechanisms
(Adapted from the previous version whose formatting TSR decided to keep screwing up lol)
Put simply, the answer is that it’s purely a mathematical coincidence - you get a differential equation of the form d[A]/dt = -k and it just so happens to be solved by the equation of a straight line, [A] = [A]0 - kt. If you want a more intellectually satisfying answer, I suppose you could instead inquire as to why reactants can be assigned orders of 0, 1 or 2 (in simple cases). For that, you need to understand reaction mechanisms. These unfortunately often aren’t taught brilliantly and hopefully a quick explainer will be of some use to you.
101 Simple reaction mechanisms
(Adapted from the previous version whose formatting TSR decided to keep screwing up lol)
Oh and apparently putting the concentration of S in causes a formatting error too lol. Pretend everything in the spoiler that has been screwed over is the concentration of S.