rejected from kings for my 30/42 lnat (international)

Hi! In terms of 'literacy test,' I believe this means the IELTs - perhaps this is what they required you to take as an international student (it should be in their entry requirements). I know that people who have been rejected from King's for their LNAT score are rejected on the basis of their "admissions test score being uncompetitive" which is greatly different to a 'literacy test'!

!!!! I see! I take Language A Eng Lit (native language course) in the IB, and was thus told I didn't need to take the IELTs by my counselor (my other unis haven't told me to do so either...) but I hadn't considered this possibility, so your reply is really helpful! thank you so much xxx D

!!!! I see! I take Language A Eng Lit (native language course) in the IB, and was thus told I didn't need to take the IELTs by my counselor (my other unis haven't told me to do so either...) but I hadn't considered this possibility, so your reply is really helpful! thank you so much xxx D

Hello fellow students! I'm an international student who has been rejected by KCL for "not meeting their literacy test requirements", which I take to mean the LNAT, for law. My PG is competitive (below 43, above 38 for IB) and I have been told my PS was excellent. I would appreciate some input in whether y'all think I should a. email KCL politely asking for their LNAT requirements this year/feedback or b. let it go. It just seems a little strange considering the average profile of their offer holders, but I don't want to be *that* student either....thanks everyone! I appreciate it

Universities do sometimes make mistakes when assessing applications, especially at the initial screening stage where the people working in admissions can be unbelievably stupid. So it is worth taking KCL up on this if you can prove, from reading their website, that your application meets standard requirements.

Universities do sometimes make mistakes when assessing applications, especially at the initial screening stage where the people working in admissions can be unbelievably stupid. So it is worth taking KCL up on this if you can prove, from reading their website, that your application meets standard requirements.