Thanks. See the
Access our Academic Regulations (17th edition) (PDF) link on Anglia Ruskin's
Student regulations and student protection plan page. The relevant section would appear to be 3.5 which says (with the bold added by me):
"3.5 Reassessment (Resit)
3.5.1 Recruits who at first assessment do not pass a module or assessment block are entitled to a reassessment opportunity (resit).
3.5.2 Only the failed elements of assessment may be re-sat.
3.5.3
The maximum mark which will be awarded for a module block or
assessment block in any re-assessment is the pass mark.
3.5.4 Where a recruit achieves a lower standard in reassessment than in first assessment, the higher mark will stand.
3.5.5 A reassessment is not permitted for any module block or assessment block where a pass mark has been achieved.
3.5.6 The scheduling of any reassessment will be determined by the Collaboration Partner Universities in conjunction with Babcock."
I don't know why they refer to a "module
block" and an "assessment
block". From the context both above and in the rest of the document, I believe they just mean "module" and "assessment". My interpretation of the above (which still isn't 100% clear, to be honest) is that if you fail an assessment, then the resit of that assessment is capped. It's only if you were to fail the entire module that the result of the whole module would be capped.
Assuming that the module definition says something along the lines of, "In order to pass this module, a weighted average mark of 40% is required", then a module-level cap would
not be appropriate. The fact that there's a separate and distinct requirement to achieve a particular mark in each assessment
should mean that only an assessment-level cap would apply.
