A-Level requirements are a key indicator of a university's academic standards and selectivity. If A-Levels were meaningless, then institutions like Nottingham Trent would be considered more prestigious than UCL, or Cardiff more prestigious than Exeter; which is clearly not the case. Employers, particularly Magic Circle firms, typically seek candidates with AAB at a minimum, but most successful applicants have significantly higher grades.
The UCAS data reinforces this point:
The average Bristol Law student has A*AA, whereas the average Exeter Law student has AAB.
Bristol has an offer rate of 9 in 20, while Exeter's is 17 in 20.
https://digital.ucas.com/coursedisplay/courses/8a8e8c1d-ff3d-6992-66d4-a67e56eaa1b0?academicYearId=2025https://digital.ucas.com/coursedisplay/courses/0b4e71f8-7a9a-f266-0926-d6e77224e8f4This objectively demonstrates that Exeter Law students have lower entry grades and that Exeter is significantly easier to gain admission to. By every logical measure entry standards, offer rates, and academic selectivity Bristol is harder to get into and has higher standards, making it more prestigious. These are facts, not opinions.
Regarding the metric you referenced, I question its credibility as it places Durham, Bristol, and Warwick below Cardiff, an institution not highly regarded in the legal industry. Durham, in particular, has an excellent reputation for Law, so its lower ranking in that metric is questionable. Durham law graduates are often just after Oxbridge/LSE/UCL in esteem.
Having worked in the legal industry at a city firm, I can confidently say that Bristol Law is widely recognised for its rep, generally considered just behind Durham. Again representation at top firms is stronger for Bristol graduates, reinforcing its higher standing. While Exeter is a good university for Law, it does not compete at the same level as Bristol in terms of consideration for top firms.