The AVD course is very poor

The AVD course has proven to be very poor quality and not worth the fees being charged. The lecture material is very outdated and full of mistakes. The staff are disinterested, inexperienced and sometimes difficult to understand. The course director seems to be only interested in himself and is not liked very much. The whole course is rushed and staff refuse to offer genuine support when we need them. There are concerns that our work is not being marked properly but the concerns keep being ignored. Very poor course.

Reply 1

Cranfield University

Official Rep

Hi @anonymous #1.

We are sorry to read of your experience. We hold ourselves to high academic standards, and take any complaints very seriously. Our course director invites you to share your concerns with us directly by email to [email protected].

Lucie
PhD Student
Student Ambassador
Cranfield University

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Articles for you

Personal Statement:Sociology and politics

Personal Statement:Ba hons social work

Personal Statement:Psychology 1 - The Student Room

Personal Statement:Psychology 17 - The Student Room

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.

Try out the app

Continue on web