The Student Room Group

Greater manchester police PECP

Hello. I am currently going through the PECP route to join GMP as police officer. I applied in November/December. I completed and passed my medical 3 weeks ago and a week or so later, I received an email from GMP saying the following,

'We have now met our Intakes for 2024/2025 and we are now working on the next Intakes for 2025/2026.

We want to reassure you that we are still processing your application, and we will be in touch again when you application has been aligned to a potential intake. These will commence from July 2025 onwards and throughout the financial year'.

Has anyone gone though this process before or does anyone have an idea how likely my start date will be sometime between, July and December and not sometime in 2026?

Reply 1

I’ve applied for the GMP through the PCEP route. Just passed the SJT and QBS. I’m confident in passing the written exercise but I’m not confident at all in the briefing and video competency exercises. Does anyone know what questions are on there? And advice on how to pass those two exercises? Would really appreciate some help

Reply 2

Original post
by LeoKud28
Hello. I am currently going through the PECP route to join GMP as police officer. I applied in November/December. I completed and passed my medical 3 weeks ago and a week or so later, I received an email from GMP saying the following,
'We have now met our Intakes for 2024/2025 and we are now working on the next Intakes for 2025/2026.
We want to reassure you that we are still processing your application, and we will be in touch again when you application has been aligned to a potential intake. These will commence from July 2025 onwards and throughout the financial year'.
Has anyone gone though this process before or does anyone have an idea how likely my start date will be sometime between, July and December and not sometime in 2026?

hey, just posted this into another similar thread, so thought I'd share here to so you at least feel like others feel the same way.

'Unfortunately, it's a rather poor reflection on GMP to have such a drawn-out recruitment process with no clear start date, even after successfully completing all the stages.

I really hope they reform the recruitment system in future. As it currently stands, you apply for the role, go through a disjointed, six-month, multi-layered process with minimal communication, and then—as you mentioned—you’re placed in a vague “no guarantees” bracket that spans an entire year. They merely anticipate you may begin at some point within that period.

That’s potentially an 18-month wait for a job. I imagine many people must drop out simply because they can’t afford to wait so long without any certainty.

It seems GMP operates under the assumption that all applicants are already employed, and therefore they’re not causing any real hardship by making people wait indefinitely. This totally disregards students and unemployed candidates—many of whom will be eager (or desperate) to begin, or at least to know when they'll start.

They also recently sent out an email trying to entice applicants over to the DCEP route, which suggests they’ve over-recruited for the PCEP scheme or expected a higher dropout rate. But in the current climate—where jobs are scarce—it’s likely those expected dropouts haven't happened. They certainly shouldn’t be opening the PCEP route again while the current waiting list remains so long.

There are some glaringly obvious reforms they could implement:

Ask candidates upfront if they’re unemployed or students. These groups should be prioritised for intake, for clear and practical reasons.

Merge the PCEP and DCEP schemes into one vacancy and randomly assign applicants to either route. This would help fill DCEP places and align the processes better. People can always switch after a year if needed.

I completely agree with you. I’ve been absolutely desperate to start, and it’s been incredibly deflating and draining to be left in limbo for such a long time. It doesn’t reflect well on GMP, and I genuinely hope the system is improved. It’s neither financially nor operationally efficient to run continual recruitment without timely intakes to match.

Reply 3

Original post
by cuunty flaps
hey, just posted this into another similar thread, so thought I'd share here to so you at least feel like others feel the same way.
'Unfortunately, it's a rather poor reflection on GMP to have such a drawn-out recruitment process with no clear start date, even after successfully completing all the stages.
I really hope they reform the recruitment system in future. As it currently stands, you apply for the role, go through a disjointed, six-month, multi-layered process with minimal communication, and then—as you mentioned—you’re placed in a vague “no guarantees” bracket that spans an entire year. They merely anticipate you may begin at some point within that period.
That’s potentially an 18-month wait for a job. I imagine many people must drop out simply because they can’t afford to wait so long without any certainty.
It seems GMP operates under the assumption that all applicants are already employed, and therefore they’re not causing any real hardship by making people wait indefinitely. This totally disregards students and unemployed candidates—many of whom will be eager (or desperate) to begin, or at least to know when they'll start.
They also recently sent out an email trying to entice applicants over to the DCEP route, which suggests they’ve over-recruited for the PCEP scheme or expected a higher dropout rate. But in the current climate—where jobs are scarce—it’s likely those expected dropouts haven't happened. They certainly shouldn’t be opening the PCEP route again while the current waiting list remains so long.
There are some glaringly obvious reforms they could implement:

Ask candidates upfront if they’re unemployed or students. These groups should be prioritised for intake, for clear and practical reasons.

Merge the PCEP and DCEP schemes into one vacancy and randomly assign applicants to either route. This would help fill DCEP places and align the processes better. People can always switch after a year if needed.

I completely agree with you. I’ve been absolutely desperate to start, and it’s been incredibly deflating and draining to be left in limbo for such a long time. It doesn’t reflect well on GMP, and I genuinely hope the system is improved. It’s neither financially nor operationally efficient to run continual recruitment without timely intakes to match.

There have always been wait times of around this level for the police. For a short period around 7-10 years ago there were relatively short waits due to the "Boris uplift", when 6-8 months was possible, but outside of that, 12-18 months has pretty much been the norm for most forces.

What is different now though, is that there is no money (at all). All the forces are broke and they are running training cohorts when it's financially possible for them, not when its convenient for new entrants. Some forces - like BTP have effectively given up recruiting and you can see that there are average wait times (post offer) of 2 years+, meaning that many candidates will wait 2-4 years, and many will never get an offer.

The uncertainty is also coming about as many forces will be trying to fill their gaps with transferees (i.e. experienced officers moving from one force to another) and if they can do this, they will naturally try to reduce the number of student officers accordingly. If they need 60 officers, but they think they might be able to get 20 as transfers, then they are going to try to cancel a class of newbies instead. It just makes sense for them.

In terms of some of your suggestions - they might be good for you in the sense that you get recruited quicker - but it's not good for anyone else. Prioritising students or the unemployed only benefits those candidates, and its a completely arbitrary criterion. If it were written down in policy, then why wouldn't people just quit their jobs, become unemployed and then get priority? Students are sometimes the poorest candidates as they're often fresh graduates / schooleavers with no other experience, and the force would be prioritising the least promising candidates.

Merging the PCEP/DCEP would make no sense as they have different training programmes and often have different entry requirements. On PCEP you don't need a degree. On many DCEPs you do. Merging would also mean the force is not recruiting to its workforce needs, but to benefit the applicants. That's just crazytown.

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.