The Student Room Group

[Official] US announces new tariffs on most countries

Scroll to see replies

Reply 800

Original post
by mqb2766
I thought it had peaked with trump doing a poor impression of basil fawlty with the german chancellor, but that was just the warm up.
Edit - fully agree about (re)funding the tax cuts. Trump was always going to borrow more money/bump up the deficit. Doge was never going to deliver the sums talked about and tariffs seemed to be a way to (try to) sell his numbers to the republicans. They are forecast to lower us and global growth, reduce us exports as happened with china in the first term, have a limited effect on bringing manufacturing jobs back to the us, ... It probably goes without saying that the main beneficiary has been trump with the new golf courses, hotels being offered to be built in far away places, and of course the tax cuts (for the well off) which was the driver of this stuff in the first place.

DOGE was never about saving government money. It was always a political purge and removing oversight.

Reply 801

Original post
by Wired_1800
It is not a good look and it would be foolish for Trump/Republicans to fight Musk. Trump has 3.5 years left in the WH, but Musk potentially has decades to destroy the Trump family.
Although he has denied it, i think the EV mandate is probably Musk’s pain point. He overreacts when his interests are not protected.
If Trump is a dodgy Epstein-ally as claimed by Musk, it must be investigated. We must protect women at all costs.
"Musk overreacts when his interests are not protected."
Like Trump, Musk overreacts when people disagree with him.

"If Trump is a dodgy Epstein-ally"
"If"? 🤣

Reply 802

Original post
by 2WheelGod
"Musk overreacts when his interests are not protected."
Like Trump, Musk overreacts when people disagree with him.
"If Trump is a dodgy Epstein-ally"
"If"? 🤣

There is no clear evidence that President Trump messed with underaged persons. Being in the proximity of Epstein does not mean that he engaged in depraved past-time activities.

Reply 803

Original post
by Wired_1800
There is no clear evidence that President Trump messed with underaged persons. Being in the proximity of Epstein does not mean that he engaged in depraved past-time activities.

I did not accuse Trump of messing with underaged persons. But as you rightly point out, lack of clear evidence for something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
And just because a court ruled that Trump committed sexual assault, and he has expressed interest in his own daughter, doesn't mean he is therefore capable of other sexual no-nos. Even Trump might have limits.

Reply 804

Original post
by 2WheelGod
DOGE was never about saving government money. It was always a political purge and removing oversight.

Sure and its "good" to see reform imported a uk version for their council. Though the doge-uk lead resigned after the reform chairman did yesterday. All going swimmingly.

Reply 805

Original post
by 2WheelGod
I wonder if the MAGA Republicans will continue to retweet Musk's posts, or suddenly decide he isn't the genius saviour they claimed he was? 🤔

Trump went very quiet yesterday, it was almost as though susan wiles had taken away his socials because he was being a bad boy.

Reply 806

Original post
by 2WheelGod
I did not accuse Trump of messing with underaged persons. But as you rightly point out, lack of clear evidence for something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
And just because a court ruled that Trump committed sexual assault, and has expressed interest in his own daughter, doesn't mean he is therefore capable of other sexual no-nos. Even Trump might have limits.

Yes, no evidence cannot indict the President. Else, one can accuse you too.

Reply 807

Original post
by Wired_1800
There is no clear evidence that President Trump messed with underaged persons. Being in the proximity of Epstein does not mean that he engaged in depraved past-time activities.

There isn't anything depraved about it.

Men will be men.

Reply 808

Original post
by Gazpacho.
As my original post instantly disappeared. A shorter version:
It is hilarious to see Trump and Musk having this fallout.
And maybe, just maybe, Trump handing Musk the keys to the federal computers before their fallout was not a very smart move.

I agree. Almost music to my ears but not quite.

My biggest failing to date is that I can't actually work out what is worst. The guy who thinks he is more charismatic/popular/intelligent than he actually is or the ketamine induced rager against the mainstream? Both make Putin seem a completely logical choice. If I was forced to vote I reckon I would vote for the short Russian guy as well. At least he is predictable.

Reply 809

Original post
by mqb2766
Trump went very quiet yesterday, it was almost as though susan wiles had taken away his socials because he was being a bad boy.

The fact Trump even has a social media prescence is almost hilarious in of itself. The guy can do more damage to your company sat on the throne playing twitter at 1am than any amount of mainstream media can do in a year.

Reply 810

Original post
by Gazpacho.
Musk and Trump fighting isn't really about the Big Beautiful Bill. Everyone knew Republicans would borrow trillions to fund their tax cuts. It happened during Trump's first presidency. It was clear in Republican policy circles in the run up to the election that it would happen again. Despite this, Musk was happy to bankroll Trump.
It is just two toddlers with massive but fragile egos falling out.
Now we have Trump stating Musk should lose his federal contracts.
Meanwhile Musk, after being given unprecedent access to government information, is insinuating Trump is a child sex offender.

What you have written is poetry. I did think the Trump presidency wasn't quite large enough for two egos of that calibre.

Any guy turning up in my office in a T shirt would have never pulled that stunt twice, I know that much.

Reply 811

Original post
by Quady
There isn't anything depraved about it.
Men will be men.

If you say so. I disagree though

Reply 812

In a surreal moment, lutnik is told that you cant build bananas in america (to remove the imposed 10% tariffs).
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/commerces-lutnick-receives-timely-reminder-cannot-build-bananas-americ-rcna211501
Luckily dean, who was questioning lutnik, had a banana to wave around.

Meanwhlie trump and musk continue to post on socials.
trumpmusk.jpg

Reply 813

Somewhat like trumps dubious justification for most of the tariffs, his justification for calling out the national guard in LA is similarly dodgy and is done against newsom's wishes.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/07/trump-national-guard
"But the law also says that orders for those purposes “shall be issued through the governors of the States”. It’s not immediately clear whether the president can activate national guard troops without the order of that state’s governor."

In the land of alternate realities, even loomer is asking elon to tweet something nice about the orangutan trump.
https://bsky.app/profile/georgetakei.bsky.social/post/3lr2otpxwwy2m
and the gop founder of latinos for trump now condemns Trump’s mass-deportation campaign
https://bsky.app/profile/rpsagainsttrump.bsky.social/post/3lr2x52kkkc2p
Who could have guessed that deporting ~14m immigrants would have caused any problems?

I guess back to tariffs after ....
(edited 5 months ago)
Please keep this to tariffs.
Clearly people have ignored the request to stick to tariffs, so I'm closing this thread until I or someone else has time to clear it up.

Quick Reply