The Student Room Group

Deciding Between Two MPhils at Cambridge

Hi, I’m a final year Politics student at KCL, and received offers for MPhil in Development Studies and MPhil in Global Risk and Resilience at Cambridge. But I cannot decide which one to choose. I’m planning to work in either political risk consultancy or journalism after graduating, so I think technically the Global Risk degree would be more useful. It includes a lot of contemporary topics like AI and pandemics and engages w policymaking. However, it’s a smaller programme that has been established this year and I’m worried that might be a disadvantage (in both teaching and careers). Also the conditional offer they gave me was 2:1 (at least 60%) which is way lower than the other one that asked for 67%. Don’t think that matters since it’s normal for a new programme, but seemed important enough to include here. On the other hand, the Development Studies degree would also be useful in general as it has an economic component in it, although it’s not a standalone economics degree so not sure how significant that is. In your experience or knowledge about both degrees, which one would you recommend? Thanks!

Reply 1

Original post
by myt27
Hi, I’m a final year Politics student at KCL, and received offers for MPhil in Development Studies and MPhil in Global Risk and Resilience at Cambridge. But I cannot decide which one to choose. I’m planning to work in either political risk consultancy or journalism after graduating, so I think technically the Global Risk degree would be more useful. It includes a lot of contemporary topics like AI and pandemics and engages w policymaking. However, it’s a smaller programme that has been established this year and I’m worried that might be a disadvantage (in both teaching and careers). Also the conditional offer they gave me was 2:1 (at least 60%) which is way lower than the other one that asked for 67%. Don’t think that matters since it’s normal for a new programme, but seemed important enough to include here. On the other hand, the Development Studies degree would also be useful in general as it has an economic component in it, although it’s not a standalone economics degree so not sure how significant that is. In your experience or knowledge about both degrees, which one would you recommend? Thanks!

I kind of want to work in a similar field and I’m opting for global risk and resilience so I’d say go for that. I’m applying quite late though, any advise on my application? I’m just polishing it before submitting but I’m really nervous
Original post
by myt27
Hi, I’m a final year Politics student at KCL, and received offers for MPhil in Development Studies and MPhil in Global Risk and Resilience at Cambridge. But I cannot decide which one to choose. I’m planning to work in either political risk consultancy or journalism after graduating, so I think technically the Global Risk degree would be more useful. It includes a lot of contemporary topics like AI and pandemics and engages w policymaking. However, it’s a smaller programme that has been established this year and I’m worried that might be a disadvantage (in both teaching and careers). Also the conditional offer they gave me was 2:1 (at least 60%) which is way lower than the other one that asked for 67%. Don’t think that matters since it’s normal for a new programme, but seemed important enough to include here. On the other hand, the Development Studies degree would also be useful in general as it has an economic component in it, although it’s not a standalone economics degree so not sure how significant that is. In your experience or knowledge about both degrees, which one would you recommend? Thanks!

It really doesn't matter. No employer is going to know or care that much detail about the course. The decision is simply which one you would prefer. Which one is more likely to open you to new ideas/thinking you might like to bring to a career?

Reply 3

Original post
by Anonymous
I kind of want to work in a similar field and I’m opting for global risk and resilience so I’d say go for that. I’m applying quite late though, any advise on my application? I’m just polishing it before submitting but I’m really nervous


Hey, honestly I believe it was my internships/work experiences at the embassies and think tanks that got me accepted. So if you have relevant experiences and got a 2:1 or 1st so far it shouldn’t be too hard to get in. Also watch the webinar they recorded this year on their website, I came across that later but it’s pretty helpful for preparing an application too!

Reply 4

Original post
by myt27
Hey, honestly I believe it was my internships/work experiences at the embassies and think tanks that got me accepted. So if you have relevant experiences and got a 2:1 or 1st so far it shouldn’t be too hard to get in. Also watch the webinar they recorded this year on their website, I came across that later but it’s pretty helpful for preparing an application too!

Thank you, I don’t have as much experience but hopefully I do get in and I’ll definitely watch the webinar.

Reply 5

I think development studies has a higher bar for entry.

Reply 6

I say go with the more established programme. It could take years for GRR to refine its course, so quality of teaching etc. is likely to be significantly better on DS. Even if the other is more relevant to your career goals, you might get more out of it. Employers will want you to have the skills from a Masters, and it seems like DS is in a better position to give you those.

Reply 7

DS better

Reply 8

Original post
by myt27
Hi, I’m a final year Politics student at KCL, and received offers for MPhil in Development Studies and MPhil in Global Risk and Resilience at Cambridge. But I cannot decide which one to choose. I’m planning to work in either political risk consultancy or journalism after graduating, so I think technically the Global Risk degree would be more useful. It includes a lot of contemporary topics like AI and pandemics and engages w policymaking. However, it’s a smaller programme that has been established this year and I’m worried that might be a disadvantage (in both teaching and careers). Also the conditional offer they gave me was 2:1 (at least 60%) which is way lower than the other one that asked for 67%. Don’t think that matters since it’s normal for a new programme, but seemed important enough to include here. On the other hand, the Development Studies degree would also be useful in general as it has an economic component in it, although it’s not a standalone economics degree so not sure how significant that is. In your experience or knowledge about both degrees, which one would you recommend? Thanks!

Development Studies.

Reply 9

Original post
by myt27
Hi, I’m a final year Politics student at KCL, and received offers for MPhil in Development Studies and MPhil in Global Risk and Resilience at Cambridge. But I cannot decide which one to choose. I’m planning to work in either political risk consultancy or journalism after graduating, so I think technically the Global Risk degree would be more useful. It includes a lot of contemporary topics like AI and pandemics and engages w policymaking. However, it’s a smaller programme that has been established this year and I’m worried that might be a disadvantage (in both teaching and careers). Also the conditional offer they gave me was 2:1 (at least 60%) which is way lower than the other one that asked for 67%. Don’t think that matters since it’s normal for a new programme, but seemed important enough to include here. On the other hand, the Development Studies degree would also be useful in general as it has an economic component in it, although it’s not a standalone economics degree so not sure how significant that is. In your experience or knowledge about both degrees, which one would you recommend? Thanks!


vote for Development studies

Quick Reply