Would I be stupid for firming Bristol Law over KCL Law?

I've been debating which to university to firm and despite KCL having a better location for law and being a couple places higher on the league tables for law. (5th on CUG vs Bristol who are 9th at the moment) I find myself doubting whether or not to firm Kings for many reasons which I'll list.
1) KCL seems to have been degrading in general reputation for the past 4-5 years. With a sharp drop off in both QS and CUG rankings, I find myself wondering whether the prestige of KCL will carry on such a decline during my degree.
2) There seems to be a general consensus that KCL's staff and admin DO NOT CARE for their students in any capacity. Of course, they are a research based institution and most lecturers are there to research, not to teach. But it must be taken into consideration if I am going to be taught by lecturers who do not seem to care. Furthermore, I am hearing that their admin is notoriously bad, with medicine students being given their timetables super late and emails of requests by students taking months to get back.
3) KCL have one of the worst student satisfaction rates of any uni. Of course, many people are quick to argue this statistic does not matter but this does not make sense to me. A good uni, to me at least, prioritizes the happiness and wellbeing of their students who are paying high amounts of money to live/study there.
4) I have heard that it is quite an isolating uni due to the campuses being spread apart so much, making it hard to make friends without going to many different societies. (Though, I appreciate that this is not the biggest factor)
I was wondering whether such points are enough to warrant firming Bristol Law instead, as it seems as though their student satisfaction rates are higher, and their course is still highly respected, and much less people who go there seem to hate their experience.

Congratulations to your offers.
First, rejecting KCL for Bristol is not stupid and vice versa, provided you have thought it over seriously.
(1) Don't overly rely on prestige and rankings. But if you insist, look into the details and some of the ranking criteria may not be objective, e.g. student satisfaction and employer's reputation.
(2) It is a very important factor. Also check the quality and time of academic staff feedback on students' work, for Bristol and KCL. Just be fair to KCL, or more important, fair to yourself in making the life-changing decision.
(3) Student satisfaction is tricky. Would students be more satisfied with an academically very demanding, pushy uni or an easy-going one?
(4) This is valid. A city uni will never beat a campus uni in this aspect.
Apart from the above, had you looked into the course structures or modules?

Thank you for all of the advice its much appreciated! I will definitely have to make my decision in the next week to focus on revision.
And to answer the course structure and modules question - yes I have done so, it seems as though King's have a more varied selection in their modules that you can take rather than Bristol which is a plus for King's. I think I have been over-analysing which uni to go to, but my parents are putting a great deal of pressure on me to firm Kings and I feel as though it's affecting my judgement. (I think they want to use the higher international prestige of King's to brag to my cousin's families overseas.... 😕 )

I am in the exact same position and am really unsure but for economics. Have you decided yet - I’m trying to decide sooner rather than later as accommodation may sell out if I do choose kcl.

I haven’t decided quite yet, but I am leaning KCL after doing more research into the law course specifically. Make sure you check which specific course you would prefer to study as the law courses at KCL and Bristol are different to the econ ones in terms of which may be better for you! If you ever need to talk, you can private message me anytime, I understand the hard decision you’re making rn! And best of luck wherever you choose to go!

I've been debating which to university to firm and despite KCL having a better location for law and being a couple places higher on the league tables for law. (5th on CUG vs Bristol who are 8th at the moment) I find myself doubting whether or not to firm Kings for many reasons which I'll list.
1) KCL seems to have been degrading in general reputation for the past 4-5 years. With a sharp drop off in both QS and CUG rankings, I find myself wondering whether the prestige of KCL will carry on such a decline during my degree.
2) There seems to be a general consensus that KCL's staff and admin DO NOT CARE for their students in any capacity. Of course, they are a research based institution and most lecturers are there to research, not to teach. But it must be taken into consideration if I am going to be taught by lecturers who do not seem to care. Furthermore, I am hearing that their admin is notoriously bad, with medicine students being given their timetables super late and emails of requests by students taking months to get back.
3) KCL have one of the worst student satisfaction rates of any uni. Of course, many people are quick to argue this statistic does not matter but this does not make sense to me. A good uni, to me at least, prioritizes the happiness and wellbeing of their students who are paying high amounts of money to live/study there.
4) I have heard that it is quite an isolating uni due to the campuses being spread apart so much, making it hard to make friends without going to many different societies. (Though, I appreciate that this is not the biggest factor)
I was wondering whether such points are enough to warrant firming Bristol Law instead, as it seems as though their student satisfaction rates are higher, and their course is still highly respected, and much less people who go there seem to hate their experience.