The Student Room Group

Edexcel A-level Biology B Paper 3 - 18th June 2025 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20

Also what did people get for:

K for bacteria? (Can't remember what it was exactly)
Quadrat that was the best? (I got the 0.01 one as that showed 60 which was closest)
T? (-2.03 or something like that? Also what did people choose for degrees of freedom? Wasn't sure if it was 15, 16, or 30 lol. Not that it really makes a huge difference to the answering of that question tbh, it'd all be 10% significant for me.)
Magnification?

Reply 21

Prancing in flower fields right now that paper was so kind hope the grade boundaries aren’t awful

Reply 22

I think it wasn’t too bad but I had a hard time on some questions trying to get all the marks esp the 5 markers

Reply 23

Original post
by pine4pple
I think it wasn’t too bad but I had a hard time on some questions trying to get all the marks esp the 5 markers


Same

Reply 24

I had a gut feeling that serial dilution would come up and didn't have time to go over it, and there it was. Just had to skip over it but only 2 marks ig. What did people put down for the enzyme question on how to make sure that the colorimeter results were similar because I was stumped

Reply 25

Original post
by Aditum
Also what did people get for:
K for bacteria? (Can't remember what it was exactly)
Quadrat that was the best? (I got the 0.01 one as that showed 60 which was closest)
T? (-2.03 or something like that? Also what did people choose for degrees of freedom? Wasn't sure if it was 15, 16, or 30 lol. Not that it really makes a huge difference to the answering of that question tbh, it'd all be 10% significant for me.)
Magnification?
bro that quadrat one, how do u even do u even get the 4 marks, i was yapping on how she had to place 500 quadrats and it was an overestimate, i said it was the best but where are the 4m

Reply 26

The 9 marker I *think* was great but it felt like I was just sort of reiterating points it said half the time

Reply 27

Original post
by opiyuoy
bro that quadrat one, how do u even do u even get the 4 marks, i was yapping on how she had to place 500 quadrats and it was an overestimate, i said it was the best but where are the 4m


You needed to calculate how many dandelions it predicted for the mean. The area was 5x10 so 50m² and it's calculated by taking how many dandelions were predicted per quadrat, then multiplying by however many times to represent 50m². For example, quadrat 0.01m² was best because it represented something like 6/500 (amount of dandelions divided by number of times used) and then you multiplied by 5000 to get 60, the closest value to 53

Reply 28

Original post
by Aditum
You needed to calculate how many dandelions it predicted for the mean. The area was 5x10 so 50m² and it's calculated by taking how many dandelions were predicted per quadrat, then multiplying by however many times to represent 50m². For example, quadrat 0.01m² was best because it represented something like 6/500 (amount of dandelions divided by number of times used) and then you multiplied by 5000 to get 60, the closest value to 53


Yep this was easy

Reply 29

Original post
by precise-pause
I had a gut feeling that serial dilution would come up and didn't have time to go over it, and there it was. Just had to skip over it but only 2 marks ig. What did people put down for the enzyme question on how to make sure that the colorimeter results were similar because I was stumped


Yeah that one was confusing. I just used a mix of stupid chemistry knowledge like making a standard solution, pulverising the nuts completely to prevent buildup in solution in specific areas, using a colorimeter to ensure they were all the same prior...honestly just threw whatever at it

Reply 30

Original post
by Aditum
You needed to calculate how many dandelions it predicted for the mean. The area was 5x10 so 50m² and it's calculated by taking how many dandelions were predicted per quadrat, then multiplying by however many times to represent 50m². For example, quadrat 0.01m² was best because it represented something like 6/500 (amount of dandelions divided by number of times used) and then you multiplied by 5000 to get 60, the closest value to 53

yea i said it was the closest i worked that out but i still said it was an overestimate but compared to 30 and 10 it’s nothing.

Reply 31

Original post
by opiyuoy
yea i said it was the closest i worked that out but i still said it was an overestimate but compared to 30 and 10 it’s nothing.


Definitely 4 marks for that then for both you and I, 3 for the three calcilations and 1 for the answer

Reply 32

Original post
by precise-pause
I had a gut feeling that serial dilution would come up and didn't have time to go over it, and there it was. Just had to skip over it but only 2 marks ig. What did people put down for the enzyme question on how to make sure that the colorimeter results were similar because I was stumped

are u talking about the student one with the extract? i just said collect all the extract and distribute it lol

Reply 33

what did everyone get for the rate of pollen tube growth? i got 2.28 micrometres per minute

Reply 34

Original post
by opiyuoy
are u talking about the student one with the extract? i just said collect all the extract and distribute it lol


I said use the same number of mung beans and add the same amount of water to each of them, and use a microscope to see the ones which have germinated I waffled so hard 😭🙏

Reply 35

Original post
by precise-pause
I had a gut feeling that serial dilution would come up and didn't have time to go over it, and there it was. Just had to skip over it but only 2 marks ig. What did people put down for the enzyme question on how to make sure that the colorimeter results were similar because I was stumped

for the colorimeter, i said find the absorbance of pure distilled water. that would be the zero error, so just take that away from all absorbance readings to accound for systematic error or some yap. i dont think that was it though

Reply 36

Original post
by yusufahmer2007
what did everyone get for the rate of pollen tube growth? i got 2.28 micrometres per minute


I think so

Reply 37

What did people say for 9 marker?

For value of seagrass I said:
1. Provides habitat for cod, increases biodiversity/species evenness and richness
1.1. Cod beneficial to UK economy, benefits human populace.
2. Prevents erosion of coastal areas thus protecting marine life and beach-based life from going extinct due to erosion of habitats.
2.1. Prevents further inland biodiversity loss from cascading extinctions.
3. Absorbs carbon.
3.1. Limits global warming which would increase sea life, see above for coastal talking points.
3.2. Prevents carbonic acid buildup in ocean leading to enzyme and protein denaturation.

For value of project:

1. Promotes biodegradeable methods.
1.1 Prevents further pollution as a result.
2. Preliminary test to see if it works.
2.1 If successful, can be replicated on larger scale in UK or other countries, new area to protect, would be feasible with benefits it brings to cod economy.
3. Helps act against global warming even during testing.
4. May lead to other hectares popping up due to seagrass reproduction.

Reply 38

Also just realised I mixed up stage micrometer and eyepiece graticule for the microscopy question, wooooops

Reply 39

Original post
by Aditum
What did people say for 9 marker?
For value of seagrass I said:
1. Provides habitat for cod, increases biodiversity/species evenness and richness
1.1. Cod beneficial to UK economy, benefits human populace.
2. Prevents erosion of coastal areas thus protecting marine life and beach-based life from going extinct due to erosion of habitats.
2.1. Prevents further inland biodiversity loss from cascading extinctions.
3. Absorbs carbon.
3.1. Limits global warming which would increase sea life, see above for coastal talking points.
3.2. Prevents carbonic acid buildup in ocean leading to enzyme and protein denaturation.
For value of project:
1. Promotes biodegradeable methods.
1.1 Prevents further pollution as a result.
2. Preliminary test to see if it works.
2.1 If successful, can be replicated on larger scale in UK or other countries, new area to protect, would be feasible with benefits it brings to cod economy.
3. Helps act against global warming even during testing.
4. May lead to other hectares popping up due to seagrass reproduction.


I also said that protecting young cod maintains global fish stocks since if the young ones die they won’t be able to reproduce. I also said if seagrass prevents erosion they won’t need to dredge as much

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.