The Student Room Group

AQA A-level English Literature B Paper 1 - 14th May 2025 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60

Original post
by dazzling-versity
The willow song as the Othello extract really threw me off😭I loved the section C errors in judgment for Keats and salesman and the Othello essay on murder and killing was meh

ikk i feel like it was the worst part of the willow song like i was waiting for Emilia's feminist rant

Reply 61

That AQA paper was genuinely so bad - i have literally been getting A+ in my mocks and now that paper has completely cooked me over. Section A - the willow scene - i talked about desdemona as a tragic victim, the tragic setting of the private bedroom and the links to public and private and fate via her made called barbary and Desdemona's fortune. Section B - i picked the sig of murder and killing but it was so hard to find ONE argument and how to link it to the tragedy of the play as a whole. I talked about the murders of roderigo, emilia and desdemona and how they are cold-blooded but it really just sounded like a narrative rather than analysis. Section C - by the end i was really shocked about how bad the paper was that when both options were bad i got frustrated. I chose the family one - spoke about Richard and England - the quote - "like a mother parted with her child", Bolingbrooke, Gaunt and Richard, Richard and Isabel, York and Aumerle. In gatsby - i spoke about Tom's affair and how that destorys his marriage with Daisy and leads her to cheat with Gatsby, Gatsby not accepting his family who are "shiftless farm people" and Mrtyle and Wilson - but my paragrapsh were very short and i was rly upset bc not one critic did i put. But how did everyone else find it?

Reply 62

Original post
by Rimshahhhhhhh
ikk i feel like it was the worst part of the willow song like i was waiting for Emilia's feminist rant

Omg Emilia would have been so good

Reply 63

Original post
by dazzling-versity
The willow song as the Othello extract really threw me off😭I loved the section C errors in judgment for Keats and salesman and the Othello essay on murder and killing was meh


Those are the exact same three questions I did with the same texts 😭

Reply 64

Original post
by Sssjsaja
god i struggled with that othello extract... and seeriously... the section b ones? MURDER AND KILLING OR EMOTIONAL EXTREMES????? wtf😭 i think i did alright on section c comparing tess and death of a salesman but not my best work honestly i was hoping for a villain question ughghhhhh i hated it the willow song extract was dire i mean holy ****

yeah like we literally opened the paper and I just felt the mutual sense of "are we being fr aqa 😭" I spent too much time pulling apart anything i could out of that extract then wrote the worst section B about his "moderation" was it?? I found it almost impossible to use any methods other than a few stage directions and entrances/exits. But i feel like I've studied Othello in depth for 2 years to write the most odd, niche essays about irrelevant parts of the play/ themes. It was so hard to build arguments and I just hope my essays actually make sense because tbh I didnt have time to read them back.

Reply 65

Original post
by ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!
yeah like we literally opened the paper and I just felt the mutual sense of "are we being fr aqa 😭" I spent too much time pulling apart anything i could out of that extract then wrote the worst section B about his "moderation" was it?? I found it almost impossible to use any methods other than a few stage directions and entrances/exits. But i feel like I've studied Othello in depth for 2 years to write the most odd, niche essays about irrelevant parts of the play/ themes. It was so hard to build arguments and I just hope my essays actually make sense because tbh I didnt have time to read them back.


Literally this!!! I sat there for 5 minutes literally just thinking what the hell do I write. I don't think my argument made sense at all, it was horrific. I literally think I just went on a tangent 💔

Reply 66

Original post
by k.wazza
I'm glad everyone agrees this paper was awful, I think it's the worst paper since 2020 since that's the oldest past paper I can find. Section B I went outside the box and said murder wasn't significant because that's the only way I could find to be perceptive and my families question was a MESS

Doesn't that seem counter-intuitive given that the entire plot drives towards their deaths resulting from a tragic downfall. How would you argue that? Genuinely curious.

Reply 67

I hated it soo much like Cyrana feels like a really complicated poem to talk about, ofcourse I got the hang of it but the overall structure was a mess. Othellos extract was horrible and it made no relation to love except for hate between companions or whatever. Yeah horrible paper not gonna lie

Reply 68

Thank goodness we don't have to do Othello, Tess or DoaS again 😭

Reply 69

Original post
by FR4NKIENSTEIN
Doesn't that seem counter-intuitive given that the entire plot drives towards their deaths resulting from a tragic downfall. How would you argue that? Genuinely curious.


i did a similar thing actually! i did how iago’s manipulations are maybe more significant than the killings themselves because it’s his manipulations that lead to them 🤷*♀️🤷*♀️ i really dk tho i feel like i might have just written myself into a bit of a mess 😭😭

Reply 70

Original post
by el_may101
i did a similar thing actually! i did how iago’s manipulations are maybe more significant than the killings themselves because it’s his manipulations that lead to them 🤷*♀️🤷*♀️ i really dk tho i feel like i might have just written myself into a bit of a mess 😭😭

I don't want to worry you and I understand your intent but surely you need to differentiate between killings and murder. To kill something is a neutral term as you simply take something's life whilst murder is an unlawful, premeditated killing with malicious intent. (e.g. Othello believes he is killing Desdemona as an act of justice as "she must die or else she'll betray more men" but in actuality he murders her as the audience is aware of her innocence and the tragedy in her death- her death has an emotional weight). Realistically, killing doesn't occur as Desdemona, Emilia and Roderigo are all murdered. However, you could debate if Othello kills himself or murders himself and if Roderigo is killed because their is no emotional weight to his death. Ultimately, the question is specifically worded to make the differentiation. You could argue that killings are insignificant as Shakespeare focuses on the morality buried within murder (he emphasises that the true tragedy lies not in death itself, but in the unjust, emotionally driven, and deceit-fueled acts of murder at the hands of Iago's machinations). Overall it's an interesting debate to be had I was just confused to this approach as arguing that killing and murder is insignificant means that Shakespeare conducted them for no reason? Hence the approach being counter-intuitive, no matter the argument there is still a massive, gaping hole in the middle of it.

Reply 71

Original post
by FR4NKIENSTEIN
I don't want to worry you and I understand your intent but surely you need to differentiate between killings and murder. To kill something is a neutral term as you simply take something's life whilst murder is an unlawful, premeditated killing with malicious intent. (e.g. Othello believes he is killing Desdemona as an act of justice as "she must die or else she'll betray more men" but in actuality he murders her as the audience is aware of her innocence and the tragedy in her death- her death has an emotional weight). Realistically, killing doesn't occur as Desdemona, Emilia and Roderigo are all murdered. However, you could debate if Othello kills himself or murders himself and if Roderigo is killed because their is no emotional weight to his death. Ultimately, the question is specifically worded to make the differentiation. You could argue that killings are insignificant as Shakespeare focuses on the morality buried within murder (he emphasises that the true tragedy lies not in death itself, but in the unjust, emotionally driven, and deceit-fueled acts of murder at the hands of Iago's machinations). Overall it's an interesting debate to be had I was just confused to this approach as arguing that killing and murder is insignificant means that Shakespeare conducted them for no reason? Hence the approach being counter-intuitive, no matter the argument there is still a massive, gaping hole in the middle of it.


holy **** 😭 kinda freaking out now icl i feel like i’ve completely ****ed up my entire exam 🥲🥲

Reply 72

Original post
by el_may101
holy **** 😭 kinda freaking out now icl i feel like i’ve completely ****ed up my entire exam 🥲🥲


If it offers you any comfort I forgot to speak about Keats in section C so I'm limited to band 4. I guess we both made silly mistakes. (Btw I went for the other question in section B as I found it a much easier question to answer). You've still got paper 2 and your NEA so don't worry about it at all.

Reply 73

Original post
by FR4NKIENSTEIN
If it offers you any comfort I forgot to speak about Keats in section C so I'm limited to band 4. I guess we both made silly mistakes. (Btw I went for the other question in section B as I found it a much easier question to answer). You've still got paper 2 and your NEA so don't worry about it at all.


What did you write about for that other question for section B? The one about Othello and feelings everything deeply. Sorry, I literally forgot how it was worded 🥲

Reply 74

Original post
by peachymuffin
What did you write about for that other question for section B? The one about Othello and feelings everything deeply. Sorry, I literally forgot how it was worded 🥲


The question was "Othello has no moderation: he loves and hates with the full force of his emotions". I agreed with the question, my thesis was premised on the idea that he feels with the full force of his emotions as a mechanism of self-preservation which is why he has no moderation. In using his emotions as a navigator to experience the world he can ignore his insecurity buried within his racial identity- as a result of himself and society. My paragraphs went a little like:
1) How and why he loves Desdemona with the full force of his emotions.
2) How and why he 'loves' (trusts) Iago with the full force of his emotions.
3) How and why he hates Desdemona with the full force of his emotions.
4) How and why he hates himself with the full force of his emotions (which he again buries within Iago).

Reply 75

Original post
by FR4NKIENSTEIN
The question was "Othello has no moderation: he loves and hates with the full force of his emotions". I agreed with the question, my thesis was premised on the idea that he feels with the full force of his emotions as a mechanism of self-preservation which is why he has no moderation. In using his emotions as a navigator to experience the world he can ignore his insecurity buried within his racial identity- as a result of himself and society. My paragraphs went a little like:
1) How and why he loves Desdemona with the full force of his emotions.
2) How and why he 'loves' (trusts) Iago with the full force of his emotions.
3) How and why he hates Desdemona with the full force of his emotions.
4) How and why he hates himself with the full force of his emotions (which he again buries within Iago).


Oh, yes, I went with a similar premise, except I ran out of time to fully talk about Iago. I think the emotions being used as a navigator to ignore his insecurity was such a smart choice!! Wishing you the best of luck in these results, seems like you really deserve it with these interpretations!

Reply 76

Original post
by el_may101
holy **** 😭 kinda freaking out now icl i feel like i’ve completely ****ed up my entire exam 🥲🥲

dont freak out, your examiner isnt assessing you on whether they agree with your argument. they are assessing your quality of writing. As long as you used relevant evidence and had a clear argument then you should get atleast a B

Reply 77

Anyone doing Regeneration tomorrow?

Reply 79

Original post
by FR4NKIENSTEIN
The question was "Othello has no moderation: he loves and hates with the full force of his emotions". I agreed with the question, my thesis was premised on the idea that he feels with the full force of his emotions as a mechanism of self-preservation which is why he has no moderation. In using his emotions as a navigator to experience the world he can ignore his insecurity buried within his racial identity- as a result of himself and society. My paragraphs went a little like:
1) How and why he loves Desdemona with the full force of his emotions.
2) How and why he 'loves' (trusts) Iago with the full force of his emotions.
3) How and why he hates Desdemona with the full force of his emotions.
4) How and why he hates himself with the full force of his emotions (which he again buries within Iago).

Your point about Iago is so comforting - I wrote the same thing and my teacher looked concerned when I told her!

I did:

trusting Iago

quickly hating Desdemona

moderation with Desdemona: he loves and hates her at once in A5S2

however, loving Desdemona: his 'hatred' was a manifestation of the strength of his love (loved not wisely but too well due to jealousy)

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.