Hi guys,
I am in a difficult situation rn as I have received offers for law from both LSE and UCL. However, the conditions of my offer to UCL are as such that I can never reach them no matter which grades I recieve this year (which makes it kinda wierd that I got an offer considering that this was made plain to them in my predicated grades and in an email that I wrote to them about it).
But anyways, I will, supposing that I meet my predicated grades, achieve a total of 2200 credits in the grade A or B but the offer requires 2250 credits in A or B. For context, this lack of 50 credits is the equivalent of a half-course (1 term) out of a total of 2400 credits.
I have emailed them about this and only got the generic answer that "The only way to guarantee your place at UCL is to meet the conditions of your offer in full. That being said, on occasion we may be able to consider candidates who have narrowly missed the conditions of their offer."
Considering that I have an offer at LSE with condition that I am almost a 100% sure that I will meet, would it be stupid to firm my UCL offer, losing my LSE offer, for the chance of being admitted even if my grades dosen't meet the specfic grade distrubution requirement? (It may be noted that my expected average grade exceeds that which can be obtained by exactly meeting the offer).
My biggest concern with UCL vs LSE is not the academics or my future carrer oppertunities, but more with the social life as I have heard that LSE tends to be antisocial while UCL seems to be more fun to be at socially.
Does anyone have any opinions of this? What would you do in my situation?