Mark 24 mark essay politics
hi could someone pls tell me how many marks u reckon this essay for the q to what extent are socialist more united than disunited
Socialism is characterised by its reaction to the growing inequality during the industrial revolution. There is generally a shared commitment to ideas surrounding equality and common humanity, however, the socialist strands still tend to diverge in certain areas. The disagreement on the understanding of human nature, class division in relation to society and capitalism as the economic system suggests that socialists are more disunited than united to a great extent.
One argument is that socialists are more united than disunited as there is general support for common humanity. Socialists take on an optimistic outlook on human nature. This belief is rooted in the idea that human behavior is shaped by social and economic conditions, rather than being fixed or inherently selfish. Marxists such as Marx and Engels, suggest that when humanity gains class consciousness, the fruition of a classless, cooperative society will be delivered. Similarly, Crosland, a social democrat, argued that under a welfare state (providing security) cooperation between individuals and compassion towards others would flourish, demonstrating the shared optimism about the potential for human goodness and inherent cooperative nature. However, a stronger argument is that socialists are more disunited than united, particularly due to the third way’s divergence from traditional socialist views on human nature. Giddens, whilst maintaining some sense of social responsibility, put an emphasis on personal autonomy, thus reflecting that individuals do not require cooperation to flourish but can equally do so in a competitive environment (like the capitalist economy), clashing with the marxist view that capitalism is damaging to human nature. Moreover, Giddens argues that individualism is compatible with social solidarity, but revolutionary socialists would see this as a fundamental contradiction. For Marxists, capitalism promotes selfishness, alienating individuals from their true cooperative nature. Overall, while socialists share a general belief in common humanity, the embrace of individualism by the third way reflects significant ideological fractures. There is large disagreement over which qualities of human nature can manifest in certain environments, suggesting that socialists are more disunited than united.
It can also be argued, although rather unconvincingly, that socialists are more united than disunited as there is agreement on the idea of capitalism being flawed. There is the shared recognition of the inequality and polarisation of society as a product of capitalism, thus leading to the belief that some degree of reform or even overhaul of capitalism must happen to achieve equality. Marx and Engels, revolutionary socialists (marxists), take the harsher stance on capitalism by suggesting the complete abolition of the system and its rejection, showing the great extent to which they tie inequality in society to the economy. Similarly, social democrats are also seen to acknowledge these inequalities reflected in the actions of Labour Prime Ministers such as Atlee, who nationalised many industries, thus moving away from private ownership, a cornerstone of capitalism. However, a stronger argument is that socialists are actually more disunited, due to the Third Way’s contrasting approach to capitalism. Third way socialists are seen to be much more accepting of the capitalist agenda, in which they embrace private ownership by moving away from nationalisation, indicated by New Labour’s revision of Clause IV which previously established Labour’s commitment to it. This stance on capitalism is driven by the fact that third way socialists accept that capitalism is an efficient system which keeps up with the demands of the increasingly global economy.
As a result, the inequality produced by capitalism, which marxists and social democrats have their primary focus on, for third way socialists is redirected to prioritising consistent economic growth within the capitalist system. Overall, the Third Way’s acceptance of capitalism, despite recognising the deep inequalities it delivers, massively contrasts with the marxist desire for the abolition of the system. Furthermore, social democrats, like Crosland, still advocate for capitalism through a mixed economy operating on keynesianism, which again doesn’t reflect the same extent of rejection for the system as marxists do. This demonstrates how socialists are disunited to a much greater extent than united.
It can be argued that socialists are broadly united in their views on society as they all believe that equality can only be achieved if society is rebuilt to address how class divisions are the source of societal conflict. Marx, a revolutionary socialist, argued that society was inherently divided by class struggle. Similarly, social democrats also acknowledge class divisions and seek to address them through welfare policies and wealth redistribution, demonstrating a broad consensus on the need to address the divisive nature of social class. However, a stronger argument is that socialists are disunited due to their differing views on the nature of equality to address such class divisions. Whilst Marxists advocate for absolute equality, focusing on maximising successful outcome, Third Way socialists emphasise equality of opportunity and social democrats promote an approach combining the two. it is absolute equality ( Equality of Outcome) ; for social democrats it is a combination of equality of outcome and opportunity and for Third Way socialist it is solely Equality of opportunity., In this way the three strands of socialism have unique concepts of equality society which they orientate their ideas on the structure of society towards. As a result, the differing types of equality among the three strands of socialism reflect their ideological disunity. Although it is common across all strands to address class divisions in society, the Marxist goal to completely eliminate class divisions contrasts too harshly with the social democrats and third way approach where they simply aim to reduce this inequality to indicate unity. This demonstrates that socialists are more disunited than united.
Overall, socialism is disunited to a much greater extent than united due to the different means and extent to their goals. In the areas of the economy, human nature and society, revolutionary socialists are much more radical, often advocating for the overhaul of systems to enable collaboration, For the other two strands, especially for third way socialists, there is much greater emphasis on the acceptance of the systems as they opt for smaller reforms to achieve a more watered-down version of marxist goals. This leads to large divergence between the ideas of socialists, indicating overwhelming disunity.
Socialism is characterised by its reaction to the growing inequality during the industrial revolution. There is generally a shared commitment to ideas surrounding equality and common humanity, however, the socialist strands still tend to diverge in certain areas. The disagreement on the understanding of human nature, class division in relation to society and capitalism as the economic system suggests that socialists are more disunited than united to a great extent.
One argument is that socialists are more united than disunited as there is general support for common humanity. Socialists take on an optimistic outlook on human nature. This belief is rooted in the idea that human behavior is shaped by social and economic conditions, rather than being fixed or inherently selfish. Marxists such as Marx and Engels, suggest that when humanity gains class consciousness, the fruition of a classless, cooperative society will be delivered. Similarly, Crosland, a social democrat, argued that under a welfare state (providing security) cooperation between individuals and compassion towards others would flourish, demonstrating the shared optimism about the potential for human goodness and inherent cooperative nature. However, a stronger argument is that socialists are more disunited than united, particularly due to the third way’s divergence from traditional socialist views on human nature. Giddens, whilst maintaining some sense of social responsibility, put an emphasis on personal autonomy, thus reflecting that individuals do not require cooperation to flourish but can equally do so in a competitive environment (like the capitalist economy), clashing with the marxist view that capitalism is damaging to human nature. Moreover, Giddens argues that individualism is compatible with social solidarity, but revolutionary socialists would see this as a fundamental contradiction. For Marxists, capitalism promotes selfishness, alienating individuals from their true cooperative nature. Overall, while socialists share a general belief in common humanity, the embrace of individualism by the third way reflects significant ideological fractures. There is large disagreement over which qualities of human nature can manifest in certain environments, suggesting that socialists are more disunited than united.
It can also be argued, although rather unconvincingly, that socialists are more united than disunited as there is agreement on the idea of capitalism being flawed. There is the shared recognition of the inequality and polarisation of society as a product of capitalism, thus leading to the belief that some degree of reform or even overhaul of capitalism must happen to achieve equality. Marx and Engels, revolutionary socialists (marxists), take the harsher stance on capitalism by suggesting the complete abolition of the system and its rejection, showing the great extent to which they tie inequality in society to the economy. Similarly, social democrats are also seen to acknowledge these inequalities reflected in the actions of Labour Prime Ministers such as Atlee, who nationalised many industries, thus moving away from private ownership, a cornerstone of capitalism. However, a stronger argument is that socialists are actually more disunited, due to the Third Way’s contrasting approach to capitalism. Third way socialists are seen to be much more accepting of the capitalist agenda, in which they embrace private ownership by moving away from nationalisation, indicated by New Labour’s revision of Clause IV which previously established Labour’s commitment to it. This stance on capitalism is driven by the fact that third way socialists accept that capitalism is an efficient system which keeps up with the demands of the increasingly global economy.
As a result, the inequality produced by capitalism, which marxists and social democrats have their primary focus on, for third way socialists is redirected to prioritising consistent economic growth within the capitalist system. Overall, the Third Way’s acceptance of capitalism, despite recognising the deep inequalities it delivers, massively contrasts with the marxist desire for the abolition of the system. Furthermore, social democrats, like Crosland, still advocate for capitalism through a mixed economy operating on keynesianism, which again doesn’t reflect the same extent of rejection for the system as marxists do. This demonstrates how socialists are disunited to a much greater extent than united.
It can be argued that socialists are broadly united in their views on society as they all believe that equality can only be achieved if society is rebuilt to address how class divisions are the source of societal conflict. Marx, a revolutionary socialist, argued that society was inherently divided by class struggle. Similarly, social democrats also acknowledge class divisions and seek to address them through welfare policies and wealth redistribution, demonstrating a broad consensus on the need to address the divisive nature of social class. However, a stronger argument is that socialists are disunited due to their differing views on the nature of equality to address such class divisions. Whilst Marxists advocate for absolute equality, focusing on maximising successful outcome, Third Way socialists emphasise equality of opportunity and social democrats promote an approach combining the two. it is absolute equality ( Equality of Outcome) ; for social democrats it is a combination of equality of outcome and opportunity and for Third Way socialist it is solely Equality of opportunity., In this way the three strands of socialism have unique concepts of equality society which they orientate their ideas on the structure of society towards. As a result, the differing types of equality among the three strands of socialism reflect their ideological disunity. Although it is common across all strands to address class divisions in society, the Marxist goal to completely eliminate class divisions contrasts too harshly with the social democrats and third way approach where they simply aim to reduce this inequality to indicate unity. This demonstrates that socialists are more disunited than united.
Overall, socialism is disunited to a much greater extent than united due to the different means and extent to their goals. In the areas of the economy, human nature and society, revolutionary socialists are much more radical, often advocating for the overhaul of systems to enable collaboration, For the other two strands, especially for third way socialists, there is much greater emphasis on the acceptance of the systems as they opt for smaller reforms to achieve a more watered-down version of marxist goals. This leads to large divergence between the ideas of socialists, indicating overwhelming disunity.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- A-level Politics Edexcel 24 Markers
- I Need Help Marking Questions On My Own
- A* in Politics
- Help with A Level English lit essays
- Politics A Level - 24-markers - liberalism
- a level lit - don't trust my teacher's marking!!
- Questions for A-levels politics students
- Politics a level
- HSPS Cambridge 2026 Applicants
- Re OCR A-Level A Grade tips
- Edexcel A Level Politics Paper 1 (9PL0 01) - 21st May 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Scored a 68(high 2:1) at 15, is politics for me ?
- Voluntarily reviewing your Essays for you! From a student who got an A* last year :)
- SQA Appeals Advice
- Alevel edexcel politics revision tips
- how to revise for politics for an A*
- using chatgpt for feedback on essays
- A-Level Please HELP URGENT!!!!
- Unseen poetry revison?
- English Literature NEA Edexcel Coursework
Latest
Trending
Last reply 7 months ago
what were the essay questions for politics alevel edexcel paper 2 2024?Articles for you
How The Student Room is moderated
To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.
