So, a few thoughts.
Communications skills and being able to think on your feet are obviously key skills for a barrister, but the skills that you need go far beyond that. It's fair to say that the job isn't office based, but again, there is more to it than it simply not being office based. It is hard work, stressful and there is a lot of pressure on you. As I said above, I would encourage you to do some mini pupillages and actually see and speak to barristers doing the job.
I wonder if we're talking at cross purposes about commercial awareness. Knowledge of what broadly is going on in the legal industry is something you should be able to build regardless of what type of lawyer you become. As I say, perhaps not in the same way as becoming a solicitor, but it is something that you need to secure pupillage, because pupillage interviews will involve answering questions, debating and engaging in discussions on current events in the legal word and notable legal issues. It doesn't mean you need an in depth, working knowledge of the law in those areas. But you need to be broadly aware of them and be able to discuss them. That is both being well read (something which you should be able to do irrespective) and being able to think and construct arguments and points on your feet.
If you're entering law for the money I would flat out not recommend that you become a barrister. If you want to make money, there are career routes that enable you to do that without the same degree of risk. There may well be a trade off between how interesting you find the work and how easy it is to get into that work, but these are the factors that you need to balance. There is something of a disconnect between wanting to be a barrister to make money, and just becoming a paralegal in the alternative. Paralegals earn relatively low wages. You can still save money working as a paralegal depending on other factors, but it's unlikely to be enough to fund significant endeavours. Barristers earn a lot more than paralegals, and indeed they usually earn notable more than solicitors of equivalent experience in the same practice area. So it does depend on what you want the money for and how much you need. Either way, I would really only recommend that you become a barrister if you want to be a barrister.
Your expenses at this stage are the Bar Course. I haven't looked up the latest fees, but it'll be somewhere around the £15,000 to £18,000 mark. If you don't get pupillage on or before the Bar Course (and most don't), you'll then need to find an alternative role, such as a paralegal or advocate, to build up the experience and skills you need to secure pupillage. Those roles, relatively speaking, are lower paid, so it's not so much the expense of doing those roles, because you'll be earning money, but more the risk of becoming stuck in lower paid employment without an obvious plan to progressing beyond securing pupillage. Some of those who don't go on to secure pupillage have managed to put themselves on alternative career paths, either inside the law or outside it, but for many they go through several years of pupillage applications and then essentially have to start again, and that's a difficult proposition. You can get scholarships to cover some or all of the cost of the Bar Course, but the larger scholarships are (as you might expect) extremely competitive.