Hi, I Urgently Need Your Opinion About This

So I have an offer for Economics andFinance bsc at UEA (Unconditional). I can apply to uni of sussex or uni of surrey but I would have to reject UEA first. Its a year 2 offer btw. What do you guys think? Is it worth the risk? I would really love to hear your thoughts on this. I have 2.5 hours to decide. Give me you're honest thoughts.
Thanks

(Please don't bump within 5mins of posting)
There's so many moving parts to this I am not sure anyone else can provide much meaningful advice.

Surrey and Sussex say they consider year 2 transfers. I meet the requirements for entry but idk about a year 2 entry. UEA said they would consider me if they have places open later. My preference is based on the fact that I see myself working in finance (perhaps as a highly paid stockbroker in the future and I'm not sure if UEA is the best option between the 3 universities).

Surrey and Sussex say they consider year 2 transfers. I meet the requirements for entry but idk about a year 2 entry. UEA said they would consider me if they have places open later. My preference is based on the fact that I see myself working in finance (perhaps as a highly paid stockbroker in the future and I'm not sure if UEA is the best option between the 3 universities).

Ok 3rd year finance and banking student here maybe I can provide something others can’t. Basically especially in finance it’s very good to have aspirations, but by NO means does a university have any control/influence once you’re actually in the field. If you genuinely think you can get a high paying job straight after graduation, please take the time to do research (respectfully).
Could it potentially get u into a better job placement, maybe….. but UEA, Surry, Sussex are by no means “competitive” in terms of job placement affects. These are not “target universities” for high paying roles straight out of graduation such as LSE, Oxford, Cambridge, St Andrews etc. Within these universities, networking is the KEY, not what is ranked higher. A middle university, is still a middle ranked university, it will look the same on paper.
Overall, like I said it’s definitely good to have aspirations, but YOU need to be realistic here as well. 1. You haven’t even gone into year 2 yet, so u don’t know if u will pass it, you haven’t done the more advanced things yet. 2. You have no experience of how the job market works (by the looks of it) 3. You’re comparing mid ranging universities, with other mid ranging universities….. it doesn’t make sense. If we are basing it on ranking UEA (assuming u mean Uni of East Anglia) that would be better on paper yes. But by NO means does this mean, the other universities are not just as good. Like I said unless it’s in the top 20 universities, u will have the same competition than others. Hence why NETWORKING is the KEY here, not what is ranked higher. Especially in finance!
I have been respectful and also given you my opinion, but no matter where you go here, networking will be the key to success here, not what is ranked higher. Any more questions pls feel free to ask

Between those 3 Unis, it won't make any discernible difference to your eventual career.
Go to UEA - its a great place to study, and you'll be fine.

Ok 3rd year finance and banking student here maybe I can provide something others can’t. Basically especially in finance it’s very good to have aspirations, but by NO means does a university have any control/influence once you’re actually in the field. If you genuinely think you can get a high paying job straight after graduation, please take the time to do research (respectfully).
Could it potentially get u into a better job placement, maybe….. but UEA, Surry, Sussex are by no means “competitive” in terms of job placement affects. These are not “target universities” for high paying roles straight out of graduation such as LSE, Oxford, Cambridge, St Andrews etc. Within these universities, networking is the KEY, not what is ranked higher. A middle university, is still a middle ranked university, it will look the same on paper.
Overall, like I said it’s definitely good to have aspirations, but YOU need to be realistic here as well. 1. You haven’t even gone into year 2 yet, so u don’t know if u will pass it, you haven’t done the more advanced things yet. 2. You have no experience of how the job market works (by the looks of it) 3. You’re comparing mid ranging universities, with other mid ranging universities….. it doesn’t make sense. If we are basing it on ranking UEA (assuming u mean Uni of East Anglia) that would be better on paper yes. But by NO means does this mean, the other universities are not just as good. Like I said unless it’s in the top 20 universities, u will have the same competition than others. Hence why NETWORKING is the KEY here, not what is ranked higher. Especially in finance!
I have been respectful and also given you my opinion, but no matter where you go here, networking will be the key to success here, not what is ranked higher. Any more questions pls feel free to ask

Hi, I know a top university is essential to get a high paying job staright out of uni, thats why I used the word "eventually" or I think I did. And even though they're not top universities some of them might still be better than others as far as universities on this level go.

Hi, thanks. If I could just add a bit more information. I would like to eventually have a high paying job as a stockbroker. Also, by accepting UEA, I would not be allowed to apply anywhere else, whereas, if I were to reject UEA and apply to one of the aforementioned universities, I could potentially re-apply to UEA if I were to not receive the answer i want from them(it depends on how fast the other universities would take to accept/reject me and how long places remain open at UEA.

Honestly - thats one big gamble for no gain. How do you know that UEA would even have you back. This is splitting hairs between 3 Unis that are on a par, so its not actually going to help a stockbroking career if you dither about between these. Stick with UEA, get a First or 2;1 and if you are really that bothered, do postgrad somewhere fancier.

Honestly - thats one big gamble for no gain. How do you know that UEA would even have you back. This is splitting hairs between 3 Unis that are on a par, so its not actually going to help a stockbroking career if you dither about between these. Stick with UEA, get a First or 2;1 and if you are really that bothered, do postgrad somewhere fancier.

Yeah, none of them are top uni's for sure. But I guess I just feel better going into the best possible uni I can, even if that's not a top university. I'm confident that UEA would take me back but only if they have space.

Honestly - thats one big gamble for no gain. How do you know that UEA would even have you back. This is splitting hairs between 3 Unis that are on a par, so its not actually going to help a stockbroking career if you dither about between these. Stick with UEA, get a First or 2;1 and if you are really that bothered, do postgrad somewhere fancier.