does it mean that crime is just the fault of somebody's social conditions i.e. somebody only commits crime because they live on a council estate?
No, you need to think about Interactionists and labelling etc. As in, what makes a crime a crime. And how it changes in society, and as time passes- e.g. homosexuality was once a crime, and now it's not. That's the social construction of homosexuality as a crime. If you get me?
Include as many perspectives as you can, such as Marxists and what they would see as crimes.
I think that's right anyway... haven't thought about Sociology since June!
Also think about self-fulfilling prophecy perhaps? If you're categorised as a troublemaker and a hopeless case then chances are you'll act like one. Poverty and poor education are also instrumental in certain types of crime such as antisocial disorder and violence. That's not to say every crime is - e-crime is commited by relatively wealthy/clever individuals for example and is largely faceless, which means it's harder to demonise.
Crime from a theoretical perspective is definitely a social construct. The label crime classifies social disorder to isolate and villify the behaviour, preventing more people from acting in a similar fashion. It's basically a mechanism to control people to act in a socially acceptable way, guarding the ideals that the society holds: namely self-preservation and property in the West.
What about the changes of social attitudes and how this affects crime?
For example, in recent years we're seeing a rise in the amount of people who aren't brought up to have respect for others, not to take responsibility for their own actions, etc, and guess what, we're facing rises in antisocial behaviour, gang related crime, underage sex, etc.
(single mothers) Women are locked up due to benefit crime, yet companies who commit tax fraud are given lesser penelities.
The famous quote you want to use here is 'social groups consitute deviance by making the rules whose infraction consitutes deviance' (that's the not exact wording, it's something like that). In other words, change what counts as crime, and therefore you change what is criminal or not. Changes in crime rates don't just reflect changes in how the rules are broken, but also reflect changes in the rules themselves. And who decides what the rules are? Usually the more powerful to control the less powerful.
i have to write also about the social construction of crime... so if i understand well ... the definition of crime, violence. etc.. is diferrent in each society because what is crime is constructed by individuals...
it could be argued crime is both socially produced and socially constructed.
look up strain theory, subcultural theory, anomie.
then contrast it against say howard becker, michel foucault for social constructionism.
also, Foucault argued knowledge was socially constructed... so that could tie in too.
good luck.
In my opinion, social disorganization, differential association, social bonding and social capital are also important theories/concepts regarding this matter..
thankyou im gunna do this now!! xx
oi, anyone got an essay on crime as a social construct?
In my top 7 predictions.
Not sure if this blog/question is still active, but I'm trying it out anyway. I'm doing a masters but haven't done sociology in a while so am slightly slow in writing my essay which is basically on Social Construct and Biological explanation of crime (Nature v Nurture). I just wanted some kind of idea on how to structure the question or where to look for some research to support either of the perspective
Not sure if this blog/question is still active, but I'm trying it out anyway. I'm doing a masters but haven't done sociology in a while so am slightly slow in writing my essay which is basically on Social Construct and Biological explanation of crime (Nature v Nurture). I just wanted some kind of idea on how to structure the question or where to look for some research to support either of the perspective
Go to first unread
, anyone want to shed some light please?? 
