The Student Room Group

AQA A/S Biology - Biology and Disease (BIOL1)

Scroll to see replies

Reply 780

Malsi101
Yes but I doubt I will. :s-smilie:

:confused:

if you hate it then it would make sense to drop it wouldn't it?

Reply 781

mobile_geek
:confused:

if you hate it then it would make sense to drop it wouldn't it?



no offence but ever heard of people taking subjects they hate cos they HAVE to...but you are right..it's an awful subject for me

Reply 782

Malsi101
no offence but ever heard of people taking subjects they hate cos they HAVE to...but you are right..it's an awful subject for me


yeah i know what you mean, if you want to do med/dent/vet med etc

Reply 783

i thought the exam was great!
there was a little too many graph questions... kinda irritating but apart from that im pretty confident! =D

Reply 784

ahhhhhhhhhh
guys.. what the hell is a bunger anyway?!?!?!

Reply 785

anyways there was basically no point of revising for that exam
it was ALL HSW AHHH :rolleyes:

Reply 786

What did you guys write for that
'How would this pie chart (of influenze strains) help a company producing vaccines?'

Reply 787

they can combine the most popular strains into 1 vaccine.and some other things about antigen-antibody complexes etc.................... and sum other stuff it was 3 marks right

Reply 788

Hippysnake
What did you guys write for that
'How would this pie chart (of influenze strains) help a company producing vaccines?'


Something like:

'They could analyse the results and produce an antibody that targeted the most prolific strain, which would be more beneficial than vaccinating against a weaker, rarer strain.'

We went through the answers afterwards and it was correct :smile:

It was a 2 mark question.

Reply 789

I talked about antigenic variation, and that the company knew which vaccine to produce.

Reply 790

Drew.
Something like:

'They could analyse the results and produce an antibody that targeted the most prolific strain, which would be more beneficial than vaccinating against a weaker, rarer strain.'

We went through the answers afterwards and it was correct :smile:

It was a 2 mark question.

Surely the company should target a strain that hadn't spread yet in order to avoid that spreading?

If you think about it, strain 1 had infected the vast majority of sufferers, so there's no point in vaccinating against that as it's bound to change it's antigens sometime soon?

Did your teacher have some sort of a mark scheme?

Reply 791

Hippysnake
Surely the company should target a strain that hadn't spread yet in order to avoid that spreading?

If you think about it, strain 1 had infected the vast majority of sufferers, so there's no point in vaccinating against that as it's bound to change it's antigens sometime soon?

Did your teacher have some sort of a mark scheme?


I think we were supposed to assume that the vaccination is given out to prevent people becoming ill, not to prevent the disease spreading.

It could mutate, but that isn't going to happen very often hence it makes more sense to vaccinate people against the most prevalent threat.

We didn't have a mark scheme, so I may be wrong but it's highly unlikely, it makes sense when you think about it.

Reply 792

another 2 marks lost for me.:sigh:

Reply 793

Malsi101
another 2 marks lost for me.:sigh:


what did you put?

Reply 794

Drew.
I think we were supposed to assume that the vaccination is given out to prevent people becoming ill, not to prevent the disease spreading.

It could mutate, but that isn't going to happen very often hence it makes more sense to vaccinate people against the most prevalent threat.

We didn't have a mark scheme, so I may be wrong but it's highly unlikely, it makes sense when you think about it.

You can't develop the flu, it must be caught, so hence when it comes to flu-

preventing people from becoming ill and preventing the spread of the disease are one and the same thing.

Ah well. Life goes on even if I am wrong.

Reply 795

Hippysnake
You can't develop the flu, it must be caught, so hence when it comes to flu-

preventing people from becoming ill and preventing the spread of the disease are one and the same thing.

Ah well. Life goes on even if I am wrong.

They aren't the same thing, preventing the spread of disease is an attempt to eliminate or isolate a disease whilst protecting against it is... just that.

Reply 796

Drew.
They aren't the same thing, preventing the spread of disease is an attempt to eliminate or isolate a disease whilst protecting against it is... just that.

In terms of Vaccination, we are try to achieve both.
Hence it makes sense to stop a pathogen that's only affected a minority but could well affect the majority.

It probably was Strain 1, and I did lose those 2 marks along with the other 30 odd marks...but it makes sense both ways.

Reply 797

Why couldn't they use it to develop a combined vaccine?

Surely that would be more effective..

That's what I thought anyway.

Reply 798

LiamSwainy
Why couldn't they use it to develop a combined vaccine?

Surely that would be more effective..

That's what I thought anyway.


That is what they do, hyopthetically of course :p:

They use the results to target the most prolific strains.

Reply 799

So why wouldn't "use the results to create an effective combined vaccine" be correct?

Or would it?