The Student Room Group

Recommendation of the National Curriculum review

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/nov/04/national-curriculum-review-in-england-10-key-recommendations


Key recommendations include:
1. Shorten GCSEs
2. Slim down GCSE content
3. Scrap the English baccalaureate suite
4. More focus on social diversity
5. Expand RE
6. New diagnostic test in maths and English
7. Statutory citizenship classes
8. Review primary grammar teaching and testing
9. Replace computing science GCSE
10. Allow students to take ‘triple science’ at GCSE

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

What are your thoughts?

Reply 2

Replace computing science GCSE with what?
Much of this just seems to be returning GCSEs to the pre-coalition/Conservative government meddling format?

Reply 4

And ..
"The review, led by Prof Becky Francis, wants pupils to spend less time in exam halls and have more time “for all of those amazing other things that schools do”, such as plays, sport and work experience."
England curriculum should focus less on exams and more on life skills, finds review | National curriculum | The Guardian

Reply 5

I'm delighted to see the demise of the fake qualification - the Ebacc.

Reply 6

Original post
by Muttley79
I'm delighted to see the demise of the fake qualification - the Ebacc.

Noooooooooooooooo

Reply 7

Original post
by Muttley79
I'm delighted to see the demise of the fake qualification - the Ebacc.

What's your problem with it? As an international student, it seemed like a fairly useful qualification. We don't have an equivalent here.

Reply 8

Original post
by Muttley79
I'm delighted to see the demise of the fake qualification - the Ebacc.

Much to the fury of the Tories, it was totally ignored by the Unis who, rightly, could see no value in it, and and that effectively made it entirely meaningless.

Reply 9

Original post
by elareare
What's your problem with it? As an international student, it seemed like a fairly useful qualification. We don't have an equivalent here.

No Uni required it or preferred it - it was always meaningless.

It was a clumsy attempt to ensure that all GCSE students took a foreign language and three sciences etc - but they then didn't fund the training or recruitment of the extra subject teachers. Typical Tory headlining with no substance.
(edited 1 day ago)

Reply 10

Original post
by McGinger
No Uni required it or preferred it - it was always meaningless.
It was a clumsy attempt to unsure that all GCSE students took a foreign language and three sciences etc - but they then didnt fund the training or recruitment of the extra subject teachers. Typical Tory headlining with no substance.

Do you mean ensure or unsure?

Reply 11

Original post
by elareare
Do you mean ensure or unsure?

Ooops - ensure!
I've corrected it, thanks.

Reply 12

Original post
by McGinger
No Uni required it or preferred it - it was always meaningless.
It was a clumsy attempt to unsure that all GCSE students took a foreign language and three sciences etc - but they then didnt fund the training or recruitment of the extra subject teachers. Typical Tory headlining with no substance.

Do GCSE students not have to take a foreign language?!
Most uni courses here require us to have English, Irish and a foreign language lol 😵*💫😵*💫

Reply 13

Original post
by elareare
Do GCSE students not have to take a foreign language?!
Most uni courses here require us to have English, Irish and a foreign language lol 😵*💫😵*💫


And why do you think that taking a foreign language makes you a better Chemistry student for example?
There is no evidence that it does, and wouldn't it be better that someone with no aptitude for languages did another subject where they were more likely to get a better grade, and actually enjoy what they were studying?

Reply 14

Original post
by McGinger
And why do you think that taking a foreign language makes you a better Chemistry student for example?
There is no evidence that it does, and wouldn't it be better that someone with no aptitude for languages did another subject where they were more likely to get a better grade, and actually enjoy what they were studying?

I don't think it makes you a better chem student lol

Reply 15

Original post
by elareare
I don't think it makes you a better chem student lol

Having to take a MFL is also a huge barrier for anyone with dyslexia or a related SEN. No uni in England requires a MFL, except for a language degree of course.

Why is Geog or History 'more valuable' than RE or Music or DT [we need designers] - it was always nonsense. It was actually introduced as a measure for the cohort that had already sat their GCSEs and of course there were cohorts already half way through their GCSEs too and another cohort about to start in Year 10.

Reply 16

Original post
by Muttley79
Having to take a MFL is also a huge barrier for anyone with dyslexia or a related SEN. No uni in England requires a MFL, except for a language degree of course.
Why is Geog or History 'more valuable' than RE or Music or DT [we need designers] - it was always nonsense. It was actually introduced as a measure for the cohort that had already sat their GCSEs and of course there were cohorts already half way through their GCSEs too and another cohort about to start in Year 10.

Do they not get exemptions for the language-y stuff????
People with dyslexia and related and such disorders get exemptions from all languages and are permitted to additional help ie laptops, personal scribes, the like. Our govt emphasises supporting everyone in their educational journey regardless of additional needs bro 😵*💫

Geography is a key skill though 🤣🤣 I find a lot of people these days NEED IT

RE is quite topical here and non-catholics are permitted to skip it in most schools.

Reply 17

It was never compulsory for all schools to adopt EBacc as a GCSE format, and actually very few did, or they later abandoned it when they realised how restrictive it was. This proposed move by the Labour government is to totally dump it and readjust the mindset away from narrow choice models.

Reply 18

Original post
by elareare
Do they not get exemptions for the language-y stuff????
People with dyslexia and related and such disorders get exemptions from all languages and are permitted to additional help ie laptops, personal scribes, the like. Our govt emphasises supporting everyone in their educational journey regardless of additional needs bro 😵*💫
Geography is a key skill though 🤣🤣 I find a lot of people these days NEED IT
RE is quite topical here and non-catholics are permitted to skip it in most schools.

No, Ebacc measure applies to all and they are supposed to sit a GCSE whatever their needs.

Geography sin't more important than any other Humanity or many other subjects whch have been side-lined by the dmage caused by the Ebacc and the strict way some schools apply it. Ofsted look at the proportion of students taking it and it is part of the school's performance measures.

Reply 19

Original post
by McGinger
It was never compulsory for all schools to adopt EBacc as a GCSE format, and actually very few did, or they later abandoned it when they realised how restrictive it was. This proposed move by the Labour government is to totally dump it and readjust the mindset away from narrow choice models.

No, sadly lots did - just look at the performance tables to see how many do 'force' students to take a MFL and History/Geography.

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.