Rejection from LSE Law LLB before I have even sat the LNAT?

Hi, I am wondering and bewildered as to how I have been rejected from LSE before I have sat my LNAT assessment.
I have also applied to Durham,UCL,Kings and was wondering if these universities will also give me such treatment considering the fact that I meet all of LSE Law's undergraduate criteria and exceed the minimum entry requirement grades significantly.
I appreciate your responses to this question as I am currently in a state of shock and fear that this was an extremely unfair rejection considering that I did not get the privilege of sitting for my LNAT yet.

Hello, only reasons I've seen LSE reject someone this early is due to expressly clear reasons why they would not want to consider you. Some of these include:

Okay, and what about LNAT - why reject when the student hasn't taken this yet? They could have achieved a high mark supporting the overall application.

Hi, I am wondering and bewildered as to how I have been rejected from LSE before I have sat my LNAT assessment.
I have also applied to Durham,UCL,Kings and was wondering if these universities will also give me such treatment considering the fact that I meet all of LSE Law's undergraduate criteria and exceed the minimum entry requirement grades significantly.
I appreciate your responses to this question as I am currently in a state of shock and fear that this was an extremely unfair rejection considering that I did not get the privilege of sitting for my LNAT yet.

Hello, only reasons I've seen LSE reject someone this early is due to expressly clear reasons why they would not want to consider you. Some of these include:

unfortunately ⁣this is quite rare, and considering you have applied for such good unis and already been rejected could indicate that your personal statement really was not up to scracth at all, or your reference, either or. OR it could be you were predicted lower than what they offer

Because whatever the reason for the rejection, the LNAT result wouldn’t make any difference to the outcome.

Hi I have been predicted two A*S and An A which was definitely above their requested A*AA and it seems my reason for rejected at least as stated by the university was due to my GCSE scores which is unusual considering I exceed all of them with 68 points in my top 8.

So why take it all then?

So why take it all then?

Hi, I am wondering and bewildered as to how I have been rejected from LSE before I have sat my LNAT assessment.
I have also applied to Durham,UCL,Kings and was wondering if these universities will also give me such treatment considering the fact that I meet all of LSE Law's undergraduate criteria and exceed the minimum entry requirement grades significantly.
I appreciate your responses to this question as I am currently in a state of shock and fear that this was an extremely unfair rejection considering that I did not get the privilege of sitting for my LNAT yet.

The LSE gets 16 or so applicants per place for Law. So, it is a true lottery. ☹️

The LSE admission process is not a lottery. Do you know what a lottery is?

Funny how people advise others when they know nothing themselves, isn't it...

Hi, I was rejected from LSE (different course, many years ago). I called their admissions team, explained that it was my dream to go there, and asked if they’d consider me if I applied again the next year with my A-level grades and some work experience, or whether it was hopeless. They said they’d review my application and I ultimately got a place (for that September). Three other friends I made there had a similar experience. There are plenty of people at LSE who were initially rejected. If it is where you want to go, don’t give up