Medicine without A level biology

Has anyone gotten into med school without doing A level bio? I know that a handful of unis, including Oxbridge, don't officially require biology (so presumable I could get in with chemistry, maths, FM and physics) but would it hinder my application at all (like would I have to overcompensate in another area and/or justify why I didn't do biology?) Because even if bio isn't technically required I'm a little nervous it might still be preferred, so if another candidate had an identical application to me in every way but did biology instead of physics/FM, they would get in instead of me

There are quite a few medical schools that don't require biology. Have a look in the medicine forum for details about the different requirements.
And if a medical school prefers biology it will say so.

Thank you. I know there are schools that don't require or officially state a preference for biology, I'm just concerned that there will still be some level of implicit preference for biology such that not doing biology might affect my chances of getting in, like if I and another applicant have identical UCAT scores and equally good personal statements, would they be more likely to be accepted just because they do biology even though it's not an official requirement?

Has anyone gotten into med school without doing A level bio? I know that a handful of unis, including Oxbridge, don't officially require biology (so presumable I could get in with chemistry, maths, FM and physics) but would it hinder my application at all (like would I have to overcompensate in another area and/or justify why I didn't do biology?) Because even if bio isn't technically required I'm a little nervous it might still be preferred, so if another candidate had an identical application to me in every way but did biology instead of physics/FM, they would get in instead of me