So much for the 2nd amendment

Except, as the video clearly shows, he was at the side of the car when the first shot was fired.
"We know this because he went to hospital"
No we don't. However, we do know that he was walking around with no sign of injury after the shooting, as the videos show.
Apart from anything else, if a turning, slow moving car is close to you, to step out of the way so it doesn't hit you (as the shooter did, before firing). Why on earth would anyone fire several shots at the driver? The vehicle could be caused to swerve and hit you. There is literally nothing about the incident that could justify his actions. But for some bizarre reason, you think it was the correct thing to do.

Ok dumbasses.
Let's say the first 2 shots missed her.
Is this 3rd shot murder, or "self defence"?

In the space of 1 second, self defense.

Ive have paused the bbc video on the verify page. There are two ICE in this image, the one on the right of the car and one in front. the one in front was the one hit and the one who shot. He is clearly in front of the car and she starts to go forward.

In the space of 1 second, self defense.

As we see the MAGA propaganda machine go into action, George Orwell’s word are prescient:
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

Very interesting when someone opens a new thread with a post mentioning 'masked death squads'. They are no such thing. What in the world are you going on about.

Very interesting when someone opens a new thread with a post mentioning 'masked death squads'. They are no such thing. What in the world are you going on about.

I moved from my phone without auto correct to my pc where i can type more accurately. the fact you bring up spelling in an argument is frankly childish.
Right the The car was not in reverse when he was hit. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c93vny222geo please watch the BBC video where they state after reversing, she moves forward. He was hit.
Do i think the self defense of an agent being driven at is justified? Yes i do. Calling it murder is strawmanning and you should stop.
The prerequisite for self defense it to defend oneself in a situation where someone else would cause you harm. i mean this is pretty simple. Just because you have not been harmed in dangerous situation doesnt mean you should stay in harms way. You dont defend yourself AFTER someone has driven a car at you, you make sure that person doesnt get the chance to.
Despite my phone ******* up the sentence structure, come on you know what i mean otherwise you have the comprehension of a 5 year old. If the officer had let the woman pick up any kind of speed and hit him, his injuries could have been severely worse. Good on him for not letting that happen.

That thing is ICE
Does ICE not exist?
They wear masks
They run about in big groups
They kill people
As @Admit-One said

A lot of security and law enforcement services worldwide wear masks.
Can you outline how many people have been executed by ICE officials last year if you're certain their primary function is to round up and eliminate average citizens in the USA?

I never said their primary function is to round up and elimintate average citizens in the USA. If that's you're opinion, fine, but don't quote words that never came out of my mouth, buddy.

I'm confused. Are you saying they are a masked death squad or not? Both you and the poster you mention seem to suggest that is the case?
I fear you are all looking at this through non-American eyes. In the USA, it is not unusual for police, law enforcement and security agencies to dress with a lot of military-esque equipment, including helmets, ballistic vests and a whole plethora of stuff, including masks. This is considered completely normal in that country though it would be a very rare thing to see in much of Europe. I think this might be the source of confusion here.

I'm confused. Are you saying they are a masked death squad or not? Both you and the poster you mention seem to suggest that is the case?

I fear you are all looking at this through non-American eyes. In the USA, it is not unusual for police, law enforcement and security agencies to dress with a lot of military-esque equipment, including helmets, ballistic vests and a whole plethora of stuff, including masks. This is considered completely normal in that country though it would be a very rare thing to see in much of Europe. I think this might be the source of confusion here.

It’s the incompetent person with a firearm killing someone that’s the concern, not the paramilitary uniform.
It Trump wants ICE on a very loose leash to discourage illegal immigration, then comparisons to blackshirts are somewhat inevitable given the way they are currently operating.

I said, "They kill people". Which is true.
YOU said "their primary function is to round up and eliminate average citizens in the USA". I think the second statement is a bit of a reach from mine.
Do not patronise me. I am well aware. The fact that law enforcement wear masks is even more of a great reason to call them 'masked', because they are.
Are you American? Additionally, why assume where I'm from?