So much for the 2nd amendment

Look, this is becoming time-consuming and largely pointless. You don't know anything about the issue and yet you cling to your belief that your opinion/attitude is so emphatically correct it's almost hilarious.
I don't have time to reply to your largely ineffectual points, I'm tired of it to be honest and I'd rather argue with a bucket of paint. However, I would point out that at no stage have I categorically stated I believe the guy is innocent or otherwise. I stated I thought this would be a case of self defence and in the main I would not be surprised if the guy was later cleared if historical precedence is any guide. By contrast, you are the one I believe making reference to 'masked death squads'. You clearly and overtly nailed your colours to the mast long before you clamped eyes on the issue, so are you realistically expecting anyone to bother with an attitude like that? I've extended this courtesy so far and it would be useful for you to consider respecting that. I must tell you I find your tone rather tiresome I'm afraid.

Didn't read any of that I'm afraid. I'm going for dinner.
Let me know when you're ready to address my actual points and drop the God-complex and I'll be happy to discuss anything you like about this incident. In exchange I might overlook prejudicial attitudes you had which I fear heretofore have confused your understanding things.

According to the slowed down video I watched. She accelerated while the wheels were pointed at the agent, she just didn't pull off until they turned to the right due to the ice.
Also the first person view from the agent in question shows the impact and even the sound from the impact.
In my opinion that constitutes full justification for what followed. I'm also certain that the same outspoken people crying murder, would be in laughing hysterically if she had killed him with the car.

The videos clearly show the 2nd and 3rd shots were fired when Ross was at the side of the car, when there was zero threat to his life. You can even see him take several quick steps alongside the car so he was able to fire the 3rd shot through the passenger window.
Many legal and law enforcement experts have reviewed the footage and the consensus is that the use of lethal force was not justified and that Ross broke a load of regulations and protocols, and that in strictly legal terms, a charge of 2nd deg murder or manslaughter would be appropriate. They also agree that under current circumstances, obtaining a conviction (or even going to trial) is would be difficult.
'The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.' George Orwell, 1984

According to the slowed down video I watched. She accelerated while the wheels were pointed at the agent, she just didn't pull off until they turned to the right due to the ice.
Also the first person view from the agent in question shows the impact and even the sound from the impact.
In my opinion that constitutes full justification for what followed. I'm also certain that the same outspoken people crying murder, would be in laughing hysterically if she had killed him with the car.

She may not have been afterwards an immediate threat to him. However I would argue that someone that drives a deadly 2 ton weapon into law enforcement remains a threat to others and society as a whole after the fact.
Please provide names/sources from these legal experts to which you refer.

She may not have been afterwards an immediate threat to him. However I would argue that someone that drives a deadly 2 ton weapon into law enforcement remains a threat to others and society as a whole after the fact.
Please provide names/sources from these legal experts to which you refer.

She may not have been afterwards an immediate threat to him. However I would argue that someone that drives a deadly 2 ton weapon into law enforcement remains a threat to others and society as a whole after the fact.
Please provide names/sources from these legal experts to which you refer.

The guy reacted to a perceived threat, rightly or wrongly, in reality it won't change the outcome. All such officers have the right to self-defence, good luck trying to change that legislation.
This is yet another incident where lethal force was used and a person died as a result. This won't even be considered news in 12 months. Officer involved shootings in the USA are not uncommon unfortunately. This is the nature of the violence in some areas there.
A portion of the second amendment community are generally supportive of the police. Of course, it's somewhat self-selecting since you have to be a law abiding citizen to be able to own a firearm and really be part of that group in the first place.

According to the slowed down video I watched. She accelerated while the wheels were pointed at the agent, she just didn't pull off until they turned to the right due to the ice.
Also the first person view from the agent in question shows the impact and even the sound from the impact.
In my opinion that constitutes full justification for what followed. I'm also certain that the same outspoken people crying murder, would be in laughing hysterically if she had killed him with the car.

"Officer involved shootings in the USA are not uncommon, unfortunately"
As you've said. Multiple times. You keep making the same few points, which other posters have largely disproved. You mystify me, honestly.

No one has disproved anything.
Extensive video examination proves nothing.
I will not be surprised if the guy is cleared.
One simply cannot interact with armed agents in this way and expect an optimal outcome.

No one has disproved anything.
Extensive video examination proves nothing.
I will not be surprised if the guy is cleared.
One simply cannot interact with armed agents in this way and expect an optimal outcome.