The Student Room Logo
Learning at Imperial College London
Imperial College London
London
This thread is closed

What do you think are the top 5 most competitive courses at the Imperial?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60
silver_j
I don't think this is necessarily true. A much better measure would be an applicants to offers ratio. The aim is to get an offer, not necessarily a place as people may decide to go to another university.

Computing (800 applicants, ~250 offers) would be around 3:1 and if the numbers that I've heard (2000 applicants, ~800 offers) for Mathematics are right, it would be somewhere in the region of 2.5:1, thus proving that computing is more competitive than mathematics.

Where are you getting those figures?
Learning at Imperial College London
Imperial College London
London
Reply 61
aria57
Where are you getting those figures?

The 250 for computing is an educated guess as we figured out they give somewhere in the region of 200 to 300 offers. They say they interview around 1/3 of applicants which would be close to 300. Even if it's less than 250, it becomes a more competitive course.

The 800 for Mathematics I found in the applications thread, someone had asked a tutor.
Reply 62
silver_j
The 250 for computing is an educated guess as we figured out they give somewhere in the region of 200 to 300 offers. They say they interview around 1/3 of applicants which would be close to 300. Even if it's less than 250, it becomes a more competitive course.

The 800 for Mathematics I found in the applications thread, someone had asked a tutor.

How did you figure that out? I'm on the course and I haven't heard those figures anywhere other than other TSR people.
Reply 63
aria57
How did you figure that out? I'm on the course and I haven't heard those figures anywhere other than other TSR people.

If they have around 150 places, then they'll need to give at least 50 to 100 more offers because of the people that will go to oxbridge instead. Not to mention the number of people who will miss the high requirements they have in the offers. It really is a guess but it must be at least 200 and I was expecting a bit more.

Edit: I just realised that the 150 includes around 30 places for JMC, so 200 is probably a much more likely figure then for Computing.
Reply 64
aria57
I don't know why I posted it... Just a few posts after someone claimed, AGAIN, that physics is competitive.

Leave it to medics to think they are amazing geniuses and think that their subject is the hardest to get into...
Medicine IMO is probably one of the safest subjects to get into. My reasoning is as follows:
It doesn't really matter which uni you study medicine in when applying for jobs.
You get 4 choices, and assuming that the application - admission ratio is simmilar for most medic universities, thats 4 / 7.2 chance of getting into a competent course.

For other career tracks, like law or econ, if you aren't oxbridge etc, then you don't really have a shot at the best jobs. Doesn't apply to medicine...

physics is competitive, why do you say it isnt? the pdf might show a lower applicants:redface:ffers ratio, but that doesnt make it less competitive. The quality of physics applicants are always extremely high, which makes it so competitive.
Reply 65
aria57
I don't know why I posted it... Just a few posts after someone claimed, AGAIN, that physics is competitive.

Leave it to medics to think they are amazing geniuses and think that their subject is the hardest to get into...
Medicine IMO is probably one of the safest subjects to get into. My reasoning is as follows:
It doesn't really matter which uni you study medicine in when applying for jobs.
You get 4 choices, and assuming that the application - admission ratio is simmilar for most medic universities, thats 4 / 7.2 chance of getting into a competent course.

For other career tracks, like law or econ, if you aren't oxbridge etc, then you don't really have a shot at the best jobs. Doesn't apply to medicine...


Unfortunately you can't assume that. The applications/admissions ratio for Cambridge was 4. something to 1 the year before last, whereas Bristol 11 to 1 and Southampton for example was 20 to 1. I read it somewhere when I applied for Medicine, but will find source soon.
Reply 66
Regarding the PDF; it's important to realise that the ratio is based just on 2007 statistics. This is a very small sample. I'm not saying it's necessarily misrepresentative, but we can't make any definite claims about what the 5 most competitive courses are, as some people seem to have suggested, just based on it.

And kcfch is right that the quality of applicants varies as well (indeed physicists have the highest number (joint with a few others)).
Reply 67
:rolleyes:

All courses are competitive. Obviously. If you get here, good for you. If you don't, don't worry, remember it is competitive and try elsewhere.

Also: if Physics were that competitive, I wouldn't be here. So ner.
Reply 68
Ashy are you on the arts & ents board?
Reply 69
aria57
Ashy are you on the arts & ents board?

I'm not on the board, but I'm a committee member of an A&E club.

Latest