The Student Room Group

AI Detection in AH Physics Project

Hi all,
I finished my advanced higher physics project this week and am going on to print it now. When re-reading it, I realised how the professional tone I used in project sounds a bit robotic, and was scared that the markers might think I used AI. When I put it into a few AI detectors, it said that my project was like 78% AI. I know everyone says these things are very unreliable, but I am really paranoid and don't want to get flagged for AI use. Should I change the way it sounds?

Reply 1

Original post
by kingpin73
Hi all,
I finished my advanced higher physics project this week and am going on to print it now. When re-reading it, I realised how the professional tone I used in project sounds a bit robotic, and was scared that the markers might think I used AI. When I put it into a few AI detectors, it said that my project was like 78% AI. I know everyone says these things are very unreliable, but I am really paranoid and don't want to get flagged for AI use. Should I change the way it sounds?

You should even though there are some things regarding the assignment that will not nescceraily lose mark but it is unrecommend. This happened with my chem assignment i memorised and copied stuff word for word and i am worried about losing marks. So please change the tone by paraphasing.

The safest option is to paraphase the whole assignment into on your word since sqa wants student to say thing in their own word it show higher understanding
If you didn't use AI you are fine.

Stop putting work in "AI detectors" which are just as often unsecured AI agents themselves which will just make up random junk to say back to you, and may also train their model on your work which could then be regurgitated for someone else and be submitted and end up creating potential issues about plagiarism.

AI isn't something your work can "catch", it's not an infection. It's a conscious choice to use a tool which you are usually being instructed not to use, an hence commit academic misconduct. If you did not do that you have nothing to worry about, end of story.

Reply 3

Original post
by artful_lounger
If you didn't use AI you are fine.
Stop putting work in "AI detectors" which are just as often unsecured AI agents themselves which will just make up random junk to say back to you, and may also train their model on your work which could then be regurgitated for someone else and be submitted and end up creating potential issues about plagiarism.
AI isn't something your work can "catch", it's not an infection. It's a conscious choice to use a tool which you are usually being instructed not to use, an hence commit academic misconduct. If you did not do that you have nothing to worry about, end of story.

i still wouldnt want any suspicion for him you know - its okay but risky and unrecommended

Quick Reply