what does it mean if your saq says your account is no longer active?? was just reinterviewed and waiting for outcome...
Same... can't log into SAQ and was re-interviewed on thursday... I'm sure it doesn't really mean anything... and at most it means that we've been rejected.
havent really been following the thread lately. was re-interviewed by 2 colleges on saturday, and cant log into my saq. is that bad news? I havent been able to log into it ever though, since being pooled.
I'm so tired. Cambridge takes up all of my thinking time.
But my SAQ is the same as the last few of you that have posted - I can't log in either, and has been 'inactive' for a week. I'm taking this as a good sign because as Crucio says - at least it doesn't mean that we have been rejected.
Thanks, if not then I'll reapply. If you guys were in my shoes, got a rejection and wanting to reapply would you go for the same college or a different one? The only advantage I can see is that the same admissions tutors would be interviewing me. However, I only realised over the last few weeks I applied to the most competitive college for my subject!
Is the Cambridge college system different to the Oxford one (i'm not sure if anyone here would know)? I'm pretty sure that with Oxford, it doesn't matter which college you apply to because you are interviewed to get into the course you applied for and not the college. So if you are accepted for the course, but not by the college, due to space constraints, you are allocated to another college (at least that's what I think it is like from what i've read).
Is the Cambridge college system different to the Oxford one (i'm not sure if anyone here would know)? I'm pretty sure that with Oxford, it doesn't matter which college you apply to because you are interviewed to get into the course you applied for and not the college. So if you are accepted for the course, but not by the college, due to space constraints, you are allocated to another college (at least that's what I think it is like from what i've read).
Nope Cambridge isn't like that. You have to be accepted for the course at your college, or you are pooled or rejected. If another college needs, say, linguists, then they'll look at the linguists from the pool and pick one.
Oxford seems similar to the Durham system, in that once the department accepts you, you're more or less in.
Nope Cambridge isn't like that. You have to be accepted for the course at your college, or you are pooled or rejected. If another college needs, say, linguists, then they'll look at the linguists from the pool and pick one.
Oxford seems similar to the Durham system, in that once the department accepts you, you're more or less in.
Wow, the Cambridge system is not of my cup of tea. Do you know if the colleges (in general) are larger then, so more offers can be given?
Wow, the Cambridge system is not of my cup of tea. Do you know if the colleges (in general) are larger then, so more offers can be given?
Errr, dno I'm afraid. You might try looking to see which place admits more undergrads per year, that might give an idea, although Oxford may be thousands of 2 people colleges for all I know.
Same... can't log into SAQ and was re-interviewed on thursday... I'm sure it doesn't really mean anything... and at most it means that we've been rejected.
im in the same situation... was reinterviewed on friday though. but havenot been to able access SAQ for ages!
Im sure it doesnt mean that its rejection! hope so ..
Wow, the Cambridge system is not of my cup of tea. Do you know if the colleges (in general) are larger then, so more offers can be given?
The added twist here is that not all colleges seem to favor the same subject balance. So, despite what they may say on the website, it would be most important to review past admission stats for your particular subject for colleges you are interested in. THIS IS A BIG LESSON I AM LEARNING NOW.
The added twist here is that not all colleges seem to favor the same subject balance. So, despite what they may say on the website, it would be most important to review past admission stats for your particular subject for colleges you are interested in. THIS IS A BIG LESSON I AM LEARNING NOW.
Generally, given that numbers are small at the college level, there isn't a great deal of variation from year to year as to the numbers admitted. What does vary, sometimes quite dramatically, is the number of applicants. It is also noticeable that less popular colleges often take proportionately fewer of their own applicants and look in the Pool instead - this is the moderation process working as it is supposed to. There are examples in the published statistics where colleges like Homerton have rejected almost all of their own applicants for a subject and filled their places from the Pool instead. Therefore, applying to a college on the basis of their admission stats is not likely to be very helpful. Equally, applying for a minority interest subject instead is not likely to make a difference to your chances of success. Admissions Tutors are very familiar with both tactics and have long since worked out how to see past it.
If you haven't been successful it's not because you applied to an oversubscribed college or subject, I'm afraid.
I got my rejection letter today (Christ's). Since my SAQ had been with my original college since pooling and I'd heard nothing since, it wasn't a huge surprise.
My interviews seemed to go very well I thought - at the end of one of them I was told that I'd impressed him and although he couldn't guarantee anything at all he hoped I got a place, so I was expecting then that if I got pooled I'd find one.
I just called New Hall. The lady was quite nice; she said she'd email me within the next hour after she'd checked the records. I dont know what to do with myself this next hour, lol
teppic1
I got my rejection letter today (Christ's). Since my SAQ had been with my original college since pooling and I'd heard nothing since, it wasn't a huge surprise.
My interviews seemed to go very well I thought - at the end of one of them I was told that I'd impressed him and although he couldn't guarantee anything at all he hoped I got a place, so I was expecting then that if I got pooled I'd find one.
Sorry to hear about that! It's quite rare that a tutor would say an applicant had impressed him, your rejection seems very strange...are you going to reapply next year? What's your second choice?
Well I haven't had my post yet but am expecting a rejection, I thought my interviews went well also but perhaps my subject was better than my general and it could have been this that stopped me getting in to the college as appose to the subject, who knows! Our is not to reason why...