No news today.... you've got to be both realistic and optimistic with this (if it's possible!) - hope for the best, but expect to be looking elsewhere.... that's how I'm trying to approach it anyway, Cambridge seems a bit of a distant dream all over again !! lol
I find it very funny I was actually pooled after one interviewer asked me: "So why exactly aren't you resitting History?" Swiftly followed by "And what happened to General studies?" :laughing:
No news today.... you've got to be both realistic and optimistic with this (if it's possible!) - hope for the best, but expect to be looking elsewhere.... that's how I'm trying to approach it anyway, Cambridge seems a bit of a distant dream all over again !! lol
mr_m
I saw one or two people, and one guy had his college changed on SAQ. No one else I know of.
Same, I am beginning to think that this time next year, I'll be swigging whiskey at the side of a road holding a sign saying, "Will rhyme for food."
I exaggerate, but there you go.
Has anyone here heard of anyone being fished for English?
A couple of us have interviews at Murray Edwards, and I think I put in an earlier post that I know of people who have Eng interviews at Downing and Churchill.
I'm sorry, but Cambridge really go about this the wrong way - they KNOW we care about getting in, so why do they spend so long fannying around?
Cruel treatment, if you ask me.
It is cruel, and most of them probably realise that, but beyond being formal in the letters they send ("it is natural to feel intial dissapointment) I suppose they can't do anything else.
Still, its the difference between a quick death (outright rejection) and a drawn out one (being pooled). I just don't appreciate the false hope.
OR just do it Oxford-style? Short, sharp - over by christmas
There are pros and cons to both selection methods. Personally, I'd have hated to have been interviewed at a number of different colleges and had to stay over night at Oxford, Cambridge is "short and sharp" in terms of the interview process at least.